Fair Process, Legitimate Discipline: Procedural Justice and the Perceived Effectiveness of Conflict Management in Ghanaian Boarding Senior High Schools | IJLTEMAS
00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Fair Process, Legitimate Discipline: Procedural Justice and the Perceived Effectiveness of Conflict Management in Ghanaian Boarding Senior High Schools

Authors

Peter Simon Kwofie

Counselling and Student Support Unit, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Ghana (GH)

Robert Ewusi-Ntenah

Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Studies, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Ghana (GH)

Abigail Adwoa Anooh Hagan

Faculty of Engineering, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Ghana (GH)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150500168

Subject Category: Education Administration

Volume/Issue: 15/5 | Page No: 2102-2116

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-11

Published: 2026-06-11

Abstract

School conflict management is often judged by whether it restores visible order. In boarding Senior High Schools, however, students and staff continue to live and work together after disputes have been formally resolved; therefore, effectiveness also depends on whether disciplinary processes are perceived as fair, respectful and legitimate. This article examines how heads, senior house staff, guidance and counselling coordinators and student leaders perceived the effectiveness of conflict-management strategies in two public boarding Senior High Schools in the Tarkwa-Nsuaem Municipality of Ghana. Drawing on a qualitative multiple-case study involving 24 participants, the article argues that effectiveness was interpreted through two related but distinct lenses: compliance-based effectiveness and legitimacy-based effectiveness. School A associated effectiveness mainly with discipline, deterrence, improved attendance and behavioural compliance, while School B associated it more strongly with engagement, relational repair, calm and follow-up. Across both cases, strategies were judged more positively when they involved timely response, meaningful voice, consistency, reason-giving, counselling support and fair stakeholder involvement. Negative cases showed that perceived bias, failure to hear parties, external reversal of decisions and weak consultation could undermine confidence even where formal disciplinary structures existed. The article contributes to school leadership literature by showing that conflict-management effectiveness in boarding Senior High Schools should be assessed not only by reduced misconduct but also by the fairness of the process through which order is achieved.

Keywords

procedural justice; conflict management; school leadership; Senior High Schools; Ghana; boarding schools; school climate; discipline; fairness

Downloads

References

1. Afful-Broni, A. (2012). Conflict management in Ghanaian schools: A case study of the role of leadership of Winneba Senior High School. International Journal of Educational Planning & Administration, 2(2), 65–76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akyina, K. O., & Manu, J. (2024). How alternative strategies to corporal punishment can be made more effective in Ghanaian basic schools: Perceptions of teachers. European Journal of Psychological Research, 11(6), 29–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cohen, J., McCabe, E. M., Michelli, N. M., & Pickeral, T. (2009). School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 180–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Coleman, P. T., Deutsch, M., & Marcus, E. C. (Eds.). (2014). The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ghana Education Service. (2016). Tools for positive discipline in basic schools. Guidance and Counselling Unit. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kumah, P. K., Ayikue, M. A., & Obeng, C. (2025). Comparing perceptions of students, teachers, and parents on disciplinary issues in public Senior High Schools: A case study of schools in Kumasi, Ghana. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 6(5), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.2025657 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). Plenum Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Plenum Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Panford-Quainoo, E., Oppong Asante, K., & Osei-Tutu, A. (2024). Practices and challenges of counselling in selected senior high schools in Accra, Ghana. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 34(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/20556365231224478 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rahim, M. A. (2017). Managing conflict in organizations (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203786482 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sam, V. N. (2020). Conflict resolution in Senior High Schools in Ghana. International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 11(2), 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D'Alessandro, A. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 357–385. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313483907 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 315–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

Engineering,
Management &
Applied Science
Journal
(IJLTEMAS)
Published by RSIS International
Tower B, Suncity Success Tower
Golf Course Ext Rd, Sector 65
Gurugram, Haryana 122101, India
© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. Published under CC BY 4.0. ISSN 2278-2540.