Patterns of Non-Compliance: Mapping Behavioral Escalation and Programmatic Clustering in Student Disciplinary Records
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Managing student conduct in a private higher education context requires a transition from anecdotal observation to empirical analysis. This study examined three academic years (2023–2026) of student offense records from the Office of Student Affairs to identify behavioral trajectories across various academic programs. By applying a dual-mode strategy—quantitative frequency mapping alongside inductive thematic analysis—the researchers uncovered a disciplinary landscape defined by two distinct pressures. First, the data reveals a systemic normalization of regulatory non-compliance, specifically regarding dress code and identification policies, which accounted for the vast majority of infractions. Second, while major violations like vaping, peer aggression, and academic dishonesty are statistically fewer, their concentration in specific technology and business-oriented cohorts suggests localized behavioral "hotspots." Crucially, the findings validate an escalation pathway: repeated minor infractions often serve as measurable precursors to more severe disciplinary breaches. These results form the basis of a proposed tiered intervention framework that shifts institutional response from reactive adjudication to proactive, program-specific behavioral formation.
Downloads
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Chen, X., & Macfarlane, B. (2024). The importance of promoting a culture of academic integrity in higher education institutions in China. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 37(1), 12-25.
Eaton, S. E., & Fishman, T. (2025). Collegiate honor codes and mandatory reporting: Have we gone too far? Journal of Academic Ethics, 23(2), 145-160.
Huang, C. L., Shao, X., & Wu, C. (2025). Navigating the digital learning landscape: Insights into ethical dilemmas and academic misconduct among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(29).
Karp, D. R. (2024). Restorative justice in higher education: A review of the literature. In Restorative Justice and Practice in US Education (pp. 217-246). Springer Nature.
Lopez, M., & Tan, K. (2023). Qualitative themes in student misconduct: A five-year longitudinal study. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 60(4), 412-428.
Miller, J. (2024). Data-driven decision making in student affairs: From spreadsheets to strategy. Higher Education Quarterly, 78(1), 88-102.
Mokomane, R. B. (2024). Restorative justice as an alternative response to student academic dishonesty in South African higher education institutions. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 27, 1-35.
Smith, L., & Brown, T. (2023). Vaping and the campus climate: Policy implications for health and discipline. Journal of American College Health, 71(5), 567-575.
Williams, D. (2025). Cultural silos: Why disciplinary infractions vary by academic major. Educational Sociology Review, 19(3), 201-218.
Zhao, Y., et al. (2025). The efficacy of ethics workshops in reducing recidivism in student conduct cases. Journal of Moral Education, 54(1), 33-49.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in our journal are licensed under CC-BY 4.0, which permits authors to retain copyright of their work. This license allows for unrestricted use, sharing, and reproduction of the articles, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors and the source.