The Silent Signal: Investigating The Impact of Greenhushing on Employee Turnover Intention Through the Mediating Role of Perceived Organizational Hypocrisy
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
In recent years, organizations have increasingly adopted sustainability initiatives; however, many deliberately limit the communication of such efforts, a phenomenon referred to as greenhushing. This study investigates the impact of greenhushing on employee turnover intention, with perceived organizational hypocrisy acting as a mediating variable. Drawing on data collected from employees across organizations in Kerala, the study employs a quantitative, descriptive research design using primary data gathered through a structured questionnaire. Established and validated measurement scales were adapted to assess greenhushing, perceived organizational hypocrisy, and employee turnover intention. The data were analyzed using appropriate statistical techniques to examine direct and indirect relationships among the study variables. The findings reveal that greenhushing significantly influences employees’ perceptions of organizational hypocrisy, which in turn increases turnover intention. The research contributes to the emerging greenhushing literature by empirically demonstrating its internal organizational consequences and offers practical insights for managers to adopt transparent and authentic sustainability communication practices to reduce employee turnover.
Downloads
References
Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275678
Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316059
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556363
Bothma, F. C., & Roodt, G. (2013). The validation of the turnover intention scale. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v11i1.507
Brunsson, N. (2007). The consequences of decision-making. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286161.001.0001
Cha, S. E., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). When values backfire: Leadership, attribution, and disenchantment in a values-driven organization. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(1), 57–78.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.10.006
Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87.https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64
Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1027–1055.https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.701
Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x
Glavas, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: Enabling employees to employ more of their whole selves at work. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 796.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00796
Gond, J. P., El Akremi, A., Swaen, V., & Babu, N. (2017). The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person-centric systematic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(2), 225–246.https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2170
Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600305
Hajj Hussein, M., & Bou Zakhem, A. (2024). Green human resource management practices and employee outcomes: The mediating role of organizational trust. Journal of Cleaner Production, 428, 140808.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140808
Hilton, J. (2025). Greenhushing: When companies choose silence over sustainability communication. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(1), 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3521
Kim, A., Kim, Y., Han, K., Jackson, S. E., & Ployhart, R. E. (2019). Multilevel influences on voluntary workplace green behavior. Journal of Management, 45(4), 1571–1600.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318765321
Lyon, T. P., & Montgomery, A. W. (2015). The means and end of greenwash. Organization & Environment, 28(2), 223–249.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575332
Makarim, R., & Muafi. (2021). Green HRM, employee engagement, and turnover intention. International Journal of Business Excellence, 24(4), 523–543.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2021.116641
Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response, and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x
Pfrombeck, J., Doden, W., Grote, G., & Feierabend, A. (2020). A study of organizational hypocrisy. Journal of Business Ethics, 165(1), 107–123.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4087-1
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 62–77.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2011.63886519
Rajeesh Kumar, M., et al., (2025). Electric Vehicle Adoption (EVA) And Its Influence in Promoting Green Mobility (GM): Assessing the Effect of Consumer Awareness Campaigns (CAC) As A Mediator. IJFANS International Journal of Food and Nutritional Sciences, 14(5), 96-112. https://www.ijfans.org/uploads/paper/aadbe8e67f1573a053a87515727fa361.pdf
Ren, S., Tang, G., & Jackson, S. E. (2018). Green HRM and employee outcomes. Human Resource Management Review, 28

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in our journal are licensed under CC-BY 4.0, which permits authors to retain copyright of their work. This license allows for unrestricted use, sharing, and reproduction of the articles, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors and the source.