Comparative Analysis of Organizational DNA Dimensions and Their Influence on Social Sustainability Performance: Evidence from the Egyptian Steel Industry | IJLTEMAS
00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Comparative Analysis of Organizational DNA Dimensions and Their Influence on Social Sustainability Performance: Evidence from the Egyptian Steel Industry

Authors

Ahmed Abdelkhalek Elseoufy

College of High Studies the Arab Academy for Management, Banking & Financial Sciences Egypt (EG)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150500254

Subject Category: Human Resources Management

Volume/Issue: 15/5 | Page No: 3111-3127

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-23

Published: 2026-06-23

Abstract

The growing emphasis on corporate sustainability has intensified the need to understand the internal organizational mechanisms that drive social sustainability outcomes. While previous studies have examined Organizational DNA as a holistic construct, limited attention has been devoted to investigating the relative influence of its individual dimensions on Social Sustainability Performance (SSP). This study addresses this gap by examining and comparing the effects of four Organizational DNA dimensions—Decision Rights, Information, Motivators, and Organizational Structure—within the context of the Egyptian private steel industry.


Using data collected from 553 employees across major private steel companies in Egypt, the study employs Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to evaluate the direct and indirect effects of Organizational DNA dimensions on SSP. Green Training is incorporated as a complementary organizational mechanism to better understand how internal organizational capabilities are translated into sustainability outcomes.


The findings reveal substantial differences among Organizational DNA dimensions. Organizational Structure emerged as the strongest predictor of Social Sustainability Performance, followed by Motivators and Decision Rights. In contrast, Information demonstrated no significant direct effect on SSP but exhibited a significant indirect effect through Green Training. The results suggest that sustainability performance is influenced not only by organizational resources and policies but also by the configuration of internal organizational systems that enable employee engagement, knowledge application, and sustainability-oriented behaviors.


This study contributes to organizational behavior and sustainability literature by providing a comparative ranking of Organizational DNA dimensions and identifying the most influential organizational levers for enhancing social sustainability performance in industrial organizations. The findings offer practical guidance for managers and policymakers seeking to accelerate sustainability transformation through organizational design and human resource development initiatives.

Keywords

Organizational DNA; Social Sustainability Performance; Green Training; Organizational Structure; Sustainability Management; Steel Industry; Egypt

Downloads

References

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Moaz, M., & Shahein, A. (2019). Organizational DNA and organizational effectiveness: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business and Management Studies, 5(2), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aust, I., Matthews, B., & Muller-Camen, M. (2020). Common good HRM: A paradigm shift in sustainable HRM? Human Resource Management Review, 30(3), 100705. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aust, I., Matthews, B., & Muller-Camen, M. (2020). Common Good HRM: A paradigm shift in Sustainable Human Resource Management? Human Resource Management Review, 30(3), 100705. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bombiak, E., & Marciniuk-Kluska, A. (2021). Green Human Resource Management as a tool for sustainable development. Sustainability, 13(8), 1–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cohen, E., Taylor, S., & Muller-Camen, M. (2012). HR's role in corporate social responsibility and sustainability. SHRM Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Daily, B. F., Bishop, J. W., & Govindarajulu, N. (2009). A conceptual model for organizational citizenship behavior directed toward the environment. Business & Society, 48(2), 243–256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Delery, J. E., & Roumpi, D. (2021). Strategic Human Resource Management, human capital and competitive advantage: Is the field going in circles? Human Resource Management Journal, 31(1), 1–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ehnert, I. (2009). Sustainable Human Resource Management: A Conceptual and Exploratory Analysis from a Paradox Perspective. Physica-Verlag. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ehnert, I., Parsa, S., Roper, I., Wagner, M., & Muller-Camen, M. (2023). Reporting on sustainability and HRM: A review and future research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100889. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Elsanhawy, M., & Badway, N. (2023). Organizational capabilities and sustainability performance: Evidence from Egyptian organizations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(4), 1250–1268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Elseoufy, A. A. (2025). Organizational DNA and Social Sustainability Performance. Independent Academic Publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Elseoufy, A. A. (2025). The Impact of Organizational DNA on Social Sustainability Performance through Green Training as a Mediating Variable: A Study on the Private Steel Industrial Companies in Egypt. Doctoral Dissertation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jabbour, C. J. C. (2013). Environmental training and environmental management maturity of Brazilian companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Jabbour, C. J. C., & Santos, F. C. A. (2008). The central role of human resource management in the search for sustainable organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(12), 2133–2154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Jabbour, C. J. C., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Sarkis, J., & Godinho Filho, M. (2022). Unlocking the circular economy through new business models based on Green Human Resource Management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Khan, P. A., Johl, S. K., & Akhtar, S. (2021). Firm sustainable performance through Green Human Resource Management practices: The mediating role of environmental performance. Sustainability, 13(16), 1–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kramar, R. (2014). Beyond strategic human resource management: Is sustainable human resource management the next approach? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(8), 1069–1089. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Neilson, G. L., Pasternack, B. A., & Mendes, D. (2005). The four building blocks of organizational DNA. Strategy & Business, 38, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Pham, N. T., Tučková, Z., & Phan, Q. P. T. (2020). Greening Human Resource Management and employee commitment toward the environment. Sustainability, 12(10), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Renwick, D. W. S., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013). Green Human Resource Management: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Roscoe, S., Subramanian, N., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Chong, T. (2020). Green Human Resource Management and the enablers of green organizational culture. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120–134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Schein, E. H. (2017). Organizational Culture and Leadership (5th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in organizations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(2), 87–98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Silva, G. M., Gomes, P. J., Sarkis, J., & Motwani, J. (2023). ESG practices and organizational sustainability performance: A systematic review and research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 2140–2161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Social Exchange Theory and sustainability-related employee behavior: Recent perspectives. (2021). Human Resource Development Review, 20(3), 245–267. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Yong, J. Y., Yusliza, M. Y., Ramayah, T., & Fawehinmi, O. (2020). Nexus between Green Intellectual Capital, Green Human Resource Management, and Sustainable Performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123–156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Yusliza, M. Y., Othman, N. Z., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2019). Deciphering the implementation of Green HRM practices: A systematic literature review. Journal of Environmental Management, 231, 1181–1190. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Zaid, A. A., Jaaron, A. A. M., & Bon, A. T. (2021). The impact of Green Human Resource Management and Green Supply Chain Management practices on sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 965–979. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Zhang, Y., Luo, Y., Zhang, X., & Zhao, J. (2022). Organizational capabilities and sustainability performance: Evidence from emerging economies. Sustainability, 14(11), 1–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

Engineering,
Management &
Applied Science
Journal
(IJLTEMAS)
Published by RSIS International
Tower B, Suncity Success Tower
Golf Course Ext Rd, Sector 65
Gurugram, Haryana 122101, India
© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. Published under CC BY 4.0. ISSN 2278-2540.