Firm Size and Environmental Disclosure Among Firmlisted on the Nairobi Securities Exchange

This study examined the relationship between firm size and environmental disclosure among firms listed on the Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE). Environmental disclosure has become an important aspect of corporate accountability due to increasing global concerns regarding environmental sustainability. However, environmental reporting among Kenyan firms remains largely voluntary because of limited regulatory frameworks and absence of mandatory disclosure standards. The study adopted an explanatory research design and utilized secondary data collected from annual reports of firms listed on the NSE for the period 2018–2022. Content analysis was employed to extract environmental disclosure information, while descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. Environmental disclosure was measured using an environmental disclosure index developed from a disclosure checklist. Firm size was measured using the logarithm of total annual sales turnover. Regression analysis findings revealed that firm size had a positive and significant relationship with environmental disclosure (β = 0.147, p = 0.010). Pearson correlation results also confirmed a significant association between firm size and environmental disclosure (r = 0.217, p = 0.001). The study concludes that larger firms are more likely to disclose environmental information than smaller firms due to increased public visibility and stakeholder pressure. The study recommends the establishment of mandatory environmental disclosure guidelines to improve transparency and sustainability reporting among listed firms in Kenya.

Firm Size., Environmental Disclosure., Sustainability Reporting, Stakeholder Theory, Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya.

1. Adams, C. A., & Frost, G. R. (2008). Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices. Accounting Forum, 32(4), 288–302. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 639–647. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 303–327. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Clarkson, P. M., Overell, M. B., & Chapple, L. (2011). Environmental reporting and its relation to corporate environmental performance. Abacus, 47(1), 27–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dey, P. K., Malesios, C., De, D., Chowdhury, S., & Abdelaziz, F. B. (2020). The impact of environmental and social practices on firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1424–1441. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. García-Sánchez, I. M., Hussain, N., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & Ruiz-Barbadillo, E. (2020). Impact of disclosure and assurance quality of corporate sustainability reports on access to finance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 825–841. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2021). GRI universal standards 2021. Global Reporting Initiative. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. IFRS Foundation. (2023). International sustainability disclosure standards. IFRS Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Issa, A., Ahmed, E., & Mwangi, M. (2023). Environmental disclosure practices and firm performance in emerging economies. Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management, 11(2), 145–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. KPMG. (2022). Big shifts, small steps: Survey of sustainability reporting 2022. KPMG International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kumar, P., & Firoz, M. (2019). Corporate environmental disclosure practices in India: Evidence from environmentally sensitive industries. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(5), 567–583. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Li, D., Zhao, Y., Sun, Y., & Yin, D. (2021). Corporate environmental performance, environmental information disclosure, and financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 97–111. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Montabon, F., Sroufe, R., & Narasimhan, R. (2007). An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 25(5), 998–1014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ong, T. S., Teh, B. H., Soh, W. N., & Yan, Y. L. (2021). Environmental disclosure practices and firm performance in developing economies. Sustainability, 13(4), 2234. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Reverte, C. (2009). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 351–366. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Uwuigbe, U., Teddy, O., & Uwuigbe, O. R. (2018). Corporate environmental reporting and firm performance: Evidence from listed firms in Nigeria. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 8(2), 239–245. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Zhang, F., Qin, X., & Liu, L. (2022). Environmental disclosure and corporate sustainability performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(4), 789–812. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Enhancing Formation Control of Multi Agent Systems Using Ann Based Technique
• Improving Sliding Mode Control with Chattering Reduction using Fuzzy Based Technique
• Cooking Quality, Fasting Blood Glucose, Glycemic Index and Load of High–Fiber Noodles Made from Wheat, Tiger Nut Residue and Cassava Flour Blends
• Matrix Rhythm Therapy Versus Interferential Therapy Combined with Lumbar Stabilization Exercises in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Comparative Trial
• Formulation and Sensory Evaluation of Functional Cake Prepared from Sweet Potato Powder