The Relationship Between Governance Accounting Practices and Risk Management among Non-Governmental Organizations in Kajiado County, Kenya
Authors
Lilian Mbatha
School of Business and Economic Studies,The Cooperative University of Kenya. (KE)
Dr. Dickson Kinyariro (PhD)
School of Business and Economic Studies,The Cooperative University of Kenya. (KE)
Dr. James Gitari (PhD)
School of Business and Economic Studies,The Cooperative University of Kenya. (KE)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600036
Subject Category: Governance Accounting
Volume/Issue: 15/6 | Page No: 468-476
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-03
Published: 2026-07-03
Abstract
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) operate in increasingly complex environments characterized by donor dependency, accountability pressures, financial uncertainty, and operational risks, making effective governance and risk management essential for organizational sustainability. Governance accounting practices such as board oversight, internal audit, compliance monitoring, transparency, and accountability structures are expected to strengthen institutional control and support risk management. However, empirical evidence on the relationship between governance accounting and risk management within NGOs in Kenya remains limited. This study examined the relationship between governance accounting practices and risk management among NGOs in Kajiado County, Kenya. A cross-sectional mixed-methods design was adopted, involving 93 respondents drawn from registered NGOs through a census approach. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and key informant interviews and analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and simple linear regression, alongside thematic analysis of qualitative data. The descriptive findings indicated high levels of governance accounting adoption among NGOs, particularly in relation to internal audits and financial controls (M = 4.59, SD = 0.56), compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements (M = 4.55, SD = 0.63), and board oversight structures (M = 4.51, SD = 0.56). Correlation analysis revealed a positive but statistically insignificant relationship between governance accounting and risk management (r = 0.186, p = 0.074). Similarly, regression analysis showed that governance accounting had a positive but statistically insignificant relationship with risk management (β = 0.306, p = 0.074), explaining 3.5% of the variation in risk management outcomes (R² = 0.035). Qualitative findings suggested that governance accounting contributed to institutional stability and accountability but was more effective when embedded in routine organizational decision-making rather than maintained primarily for compliance. The study concludes that governance accounting is an important accountability and control mechanism within NGOs, but its independent contribution to risk management is limited when examined in isolation. The study recommends stronger integration of governance systems into strategic risk oversight, institutional decision-making, and organizational accountability frameworks.
Keywords
Governance accounting, risk management, NGOs, accountability, internal controls, Kenya.
Downloads
References
1. Adams, C. A. (2017). The sustainable development goals, integrated thinking and the integrated report. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(3), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Arena, M., Arnaboldi, M., & Azzone, G. (2010). The organizational dynamics of enterprise risk management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(7), 659–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2010.07.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bebbington, J., Unerman, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2014). Sustainability accounting and accountability (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Ebrahim, A. (2019). Measuring social change: Performance and accountability in a complex world. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 17(3), 40–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability... and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organizations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Hopkin, P. (2018). Fundamentals of risk management: Understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management (5th ed.). Kogan Page. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 risk management—Guidelines. ISO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Jordan, L., & van Tuijl, P. (2018). NGO accountability: Politics, principles and innovations. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Mikes, A., & Kaplan, R. S. (2015). When one size doesn’t fit all: Evolving directions in the research and practice of enterprise risk management. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 27(1), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12098 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. O’Dwyer, B., & Boomsma, R. (2015). The co-construction of NGO accountability: Aligning imposed and felt accountability in NGO-funder accountability relationships. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(1), 36–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2013-1488 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Power, M. (2009). The risk management of nothing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6–7), 849–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.06.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2017). Contemporary environmental accounting: Issues, concepts and practice. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Simons, R. (2014). How risky is your company? Harvard Business Review Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2018). ISO 31000:2018 Risk Management—Guidelines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Enhancing Formation Control of Multi Agent Systems Using Ann Based Technique
- Improving Sliding Mode Control with Chattering Reduction using Fuzzy Based Technique
- Cooking Quality, Fasting Blood Glucose, Glycemic Index and Load of High–Fiber Noodles Made from Wheat, Tiger Nut Residue and Cassava Flour Blends
- Matrix Rhythm Therapy Versus Interferential Therapy Combined with Lumbar Stabilization Exercises in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Comparative Trial
- Formulation and Sensory Evaluation of Functional Cake Prepared from Sweet Potato Powder