The Relationship Between Governance Accounting Practices and Risk Management among Non-Governmental Organizations in Kajiado County, Kenya
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) operate in increasingly complex environments characterized by donor dependency, accountability pressures, financial uncertainty, and operational risks, making effective governance and risk management essential for organizational sustainability. Governance accounting practices such as board oversight, internal audit, compliance monitoring, transparency, and accountability structures are expected to strengthen institutional control and support risk management. However, empirical evidence on the relationship between governance accounting and risk management within NGOs in Kenya remains limited. This study examined the relationship between governance accounting practices and risk management among NGOs in Kajiado County, Kenya. A cross-sectional mixed-methods design was adopted, involving 93 respondents drawn from registered NGOs through a census approach. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and key informant interviews and analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and simple linear regression, alongside thematic analysis of qualitative data. The descriptive findings indicated high levels of governance accounting adoption among NGOs, particularly in relation to internal audits and financial controls (M = 4.59, SD = 0.56), compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements (M = 4.55, SD = 0.63), and board oversight structures (M = 4.51, SD = 0.56). Correlation analysis revealed a positive but statistically insignificant relationship between governance accounting and risk management (r = 0.186, p = 0.074). Similarly, regression analysis showed that governance accounting had a positive but statistically insignificant relationship with risk management (β = 0.306, p = 0.074), explaining 3.5% of the variation in risk management outcomes (R² = 0.035). Qualitative findings suggested that governance accounting contributed to institutional stability and accountability but was more effective when embedded in routine organizational decision-making rather than maintained primarily for compliance. The study concludes that governance accounting is an important accountability and control mechanism within NGOs, but its independent contribution to risk management is limited when examined in isolation. The study recommends stronger integration of governance systems into strategic risk oversight, institutional decision-making, and organizational accountability frameworks.
Downloads
References
Adams, C. A. (2017). The sustainable development goals, integrated thinking and the integrated report. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(3), 1–20.
Arena, M., Arnaboldi, M., & Azzone, G. (2010). The organizational dynamics of enterprise risk management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(7), 659–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2010.07.003
Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023
Bebbington, J., Unerman, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2014). Sustainability accounting and accountability (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Ebrahim, A. (2019). Measuring social change: Performance and accountability in a complex world. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 17(3), 40–47.
Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability... and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organizations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006
Hopkin, P. (2018). Fundamentals of risk management: Understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management (5th ed.). Kogan Page.
International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 risk management—Guidelines. ISO.
Jordan, L., & van Tuijl, P. (2018). NGO accountability: Politics, principles and innovations. Routledge.
Mikes, A., & Kaplan, R. S. (2015). When one size doesn’t fit all: Evolving directions in the research and practice of enterprise risk management. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 27(1), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12098
O’Dwyer, B., & Boomsma, R. (2015). The co-construction of NGO accountability: Aligning imposed and felt accountability in NGO-funder accountability relationships. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(1), 36–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2013-1488
Power, M. (2009). The risk management of nothing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6–7), 849–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.06.001
Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2017). Contemporary environmental accounting: Issues, concepts and practice. Routledge.
Simons, R. (2014). How risky is your company? Harvard Business Review Press.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2018). ISO 31000:2018 Risk Management—Guidelines.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in our journal are licensed under CC-BY 4.0, which permits authors to retain copyright of their work. This license allows for unrestricted use, sharing, and reproduction of the articles, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors and the source.