An IT Governance Framework for Blockchain-Enabled Information Integrity in Philippine Private Higher Education Institutions

Information integrity is a critical priority for private higher education institutions (PHEIs) as it supports institutional credibility, graduate employability, and compliance with accrediting and regulatory bodies. Academic recordkeeping in Philippine PHEIs continues to evolve as part of broader digital transformation initiatives. Although blockchain technology offers features such as immutability, decentralization, and verifiability, its adoption should not be approached solely as a technical undertaking. Effective implementation requires IT governance mechanisms that align technological initiatives with institutional goals, ensure responsible resource allocation, manage organizational and security risks, and facilitate coordination among key stakeholders. This study proposes an adaptable IT Governance Framework for blockchain-enabled information integrity in Philippine private higher education institutions. Developed from the perspectives of stakeholders within a PHEI context, the framework highlights the coordinating role of the IT Department while integrating the responsibilities of the Registrar, Finance Office, Accreditation or Quality Assurance Unit, and Senior Management. The framework combines blockchain capabilities with governance practices involving strategic alignment, resource and investment management, risk management and security, roles and accountability, and performance and compliance monitoring. Using a mixed-method approach involving surveys and interviews with key institutional stakeholders, the findings provide empirical support for governance-driven blockchain adoption characterized by clear policies, phased implementation, stakeholder collaboration, and adequate resource allocation. The proposed framework offers a practical roadmap for institutional leaders seeking to strengthen information integrity while advancing digital transformation in a manner that promotes trust, accountability, and regulatory compliance. The study concludes that blockchain adoption should be regarded not merely as a technology upgrade but as an IT governance initiative that can be adapted by Philippine PHEIs operating within similar governance and regulatory environments.

IT Governance, Blockchain, Information Integrity, Academic Recordkeeping, Resource Management

1. Wang, X., Younas, M., Jiang, Y., & Imran, M. (2024). Transforming education through blockchain: A systematic review of applications, projects, and challenges. IEEE Access, 13, 13264–13284. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3519350 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Mikroyannidis, A., Third, A., & Domingue, J. (2024). Blockchain-based decentralised micro-accreditation for lifelong learning. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2401485 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alshareef, N., Sandhu, K., Shahzad, K., & Hussain, W. (2022). Role of leadership in adoption of blockchain technology in small and medium enterprises in Saudi Arabia. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 911432. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911432 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Kuleto, V., Ilić, M., Dumangiu, M., Ranković, M., Martins, O. M. D., Păun, D., & Mihoreanu, L. (2022). The potential of blockchain technology in higher education as perceived by students in Serbia, Romania and Portugal, 14(2), Article 749. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020749 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Mohammad, A., & Vargas, S. (2022). Barriers affecting higher education institutions' adoption of blockchain technology: A qualitative study. Informatics, 9(3), Article 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics9030064 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Siddiqui, S. T., Ahmad, M. O., Khamruddin, M., & Gupta, A. K. (2022). Blockchain and IoT for educational certificates generation and verification. In 2022 2nd International Conference on Computing and Information Technology (ICCIT). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIT52419.2022.9711656 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Alam, S., Abdullah, H., Abdulhaq, R., & Hayawi, A. (2021). A blockchain-based framework for secure educational credentials. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(10), 5157–5167. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i10.5298 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bhaskar, P., Tiwari, C. K., & Joshi, A. (2021). Blockchain in education management: Present and future applications. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-07-2020-0102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bianchi, I. S., Sousa, R. D., Pereira, R., van Hillegersberg, J., & Mezzomo, A. (2021). Information technology governance for higher education institutions: A multi-country study. Informatics, 8(2), Article 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8020026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bucea-Manea-Țoniș, R., Martins, O. M. D., Bucea-Manea-Țoniș, R., & Gheorghiță, C. (2021). Blockchain technology enhances sustainable higher education. Sustainability, 13(22), Article 12347. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212347 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Castro, R. Q., & Oliveira, M. A.-Y. (2021). Blockchain and higher education diplomas. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(1), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11010013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Delgado-von Eitzen, C., & Pisani, F. (2021). Blockchain applications in education: A systematic literature review. Applied Sciences, 11(24), Article 11811. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411811 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Raimundo, R., & Rosário, A. (2021). Blockchain system in higher education. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(1), 276–293. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11010021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Tan, E., Mahula, S., & Crompvoets, J. (2021). Blockchain governance in the public sector: A conceptual framework for public management. Government Information Quarterly, 39(6), Article 101625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101625 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. van Pelt, R., Jansen, S., Baars, D., & Overbeek, S. (2020). Defining blockchain governance: A framework for analysis and comparison. Information Systems Management, 38(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2020.1720046 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Awaji, B., Solaiman, E., & Albshri, A. (2020). Blockchain-based applications in higher education: A systematic mapping study. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.14528 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mahamatov, N., Kuvnakov, A., & Yokubov, B. (2020). Application of blockchain technology in higher education. In 2020 International Conference on Information Science and Communications Technologies (ICISCT). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISCT50599.2020.9351424 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Salandanan, M. T. (2020). Blockchain technology as a competitive advantage for higher education institutions in the Philippines. Millennium Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.47340/mjhss.v1i3.16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Enhancing Formation Control of Multi Agent Systems Using Ann Based Technique
• Improving Sliding Mode Control with Chattering Reduction using Fuzzy Based Technique
• Cooking Quality, Fasting Blood Glucose, Glycemic Index and Load of High–Fiber Noodles Made from Wheat, Tiger Nut Residue and Cassava Flour Blends
• Matrix Rhythm Therapy Versus Interferential Therapy Combined with Lumbar Stabilization Exercises in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Comparative Trial
• Formulation and Sensory Evaluation of Functional Cake Prepared from Sweet Potato Powder