Relationship Between Workspace Ergonomics and Psychological Stress in Lasustech Architecture Studios
Authors
Opeyemi A. Asaju
Department of Architecture, Caleb University, Imota, Ikorodu, Lagos (NG)
Adedeji H. Azeez
Department of Architecture, Caleb University, Imota, Ikorodu, Lagos (NG)
Segun J. Dada
Department of Architecture, Caleb University, Imota, Ikorodu, Lagos (NG)
Benedict O. Izokhae
Department of Architecture, Caleb University, Imota, Ikorodu, Lagos (NG)
Olalekan L. Oyeshola
Department of Architecture, Caleb University, Imota, Ikorodu, Lagos (NG)
Obafemi A. Ibitoye
Department of Architecture, Caleb University, Imota, Ikorodu, Lagos (NG)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600063
Subject Category: Workspace Ergonomics
Volume/Issue: 15/6 | Page No: 824-846
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-06
Published: 2026-07-06
Abstract
Lagos State University of Science and Technology’s architecture studio serves as an intensive academic and creative environment where students spend prolonged hours engaging in design-related activities. However, inadequate ergonomics, such as uncomfortable furniture, poor lighting, insufficient ventilation, overcrowding, and prolonged sitting, contributed to psychological stress among architecture students. This study therefore examined the relationship between workspace ergonomics and psychological stress in LASUSTECH architecture studios to improve students’ well-being and create healthier learning environments. The study adopted a mixed-method descriptive research approach. Data were gathered through questionnaires and physical observations, conducted with architecture students in selected studio spaces at LASUSTECH. Statistical tools such as frequency distribution, mean score analysis, and correlation analysis were used to analyse the data collected. The findings revealed that poor ergonomics in LASUSTECH architecture studios significantly affected students’ psychological stress levels, leading to fatigue, anxiety, reduced concentration, emotional exhaustion, and decreased academic performance. The study also identified the major ergonomic factors contributing to stress among architecture students. The study concludes that workspace ergonomics plays a significant role in enhancing students’ psychological well-being, comfort, and productivity within architecture studios. Proper ergonomic considerations in studio planning and design are therefore essential to achieving conducive, student-friendly learning environments. The study recommends that policymakers, university administrators, and educational planners establish ergonomic standards for architecture studios by improving furniture quality, lighting systems, ventilation, spatial organisation, and indoor environmental conditions within higher institutions.
Keywords
LASUSTECH Architecture Studios, Learning Environment, Psychological Stress, Student Well-being, Workspace Ergonomics
Downloads
References
1. Abdulkadir, M., Lasisi, O. I., Ojile, P., & Adeyemi, A. J. (2020). The effect of furniture intervention on the occurrence of musculoskeletal disorders and academic performance of students in North-West Nigeria. SAGE Publications, *65*(1), 195-203. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Akinluyi, M. L., Fadamiro, J., Ayoola, H., & Alade, M. (2024). Efficacy of architectural space design for healing and humanisation in Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, *14*(1), 5-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Ali, A. S., Chua, S. J. L., & Lim, M. E.-L. (2015). The effect of physical environment comfort on employees' performance in office buildings. Structural Survey, *33*(4/5), 294-308. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Asaju, O. A., Olusada, M., Adelore, C., Onamade, A. O., & Otunnoyo, G. A. (2026). The effect of the design studio environment on the mental well-being of architecture students in selected universities in Nigeria. In C. Aigbavboa, B. Awuzie, D. Aghimien, A. E. Oke, & T. Omotayo (Eds.), Facilitating inclusivity in multi-, inter-, and transdisciplinary sustainable built environment research in emerging economies (pp. 1585-1594). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-08992-2_133 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Asaju, O. A., Onamade, A. O., Chukwuka, O. P., Odefadehan, C., & Alagbe, O. (2024). IEQ of studio environment on academic performance of architectural students at Caleb University, Lagos, Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Built Environment. 5(1) 1-7 https://bcsdjournals.com/index.php/mejrhss/article/download/672/404 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bay-Sahin, E., & Shah, N. (2026). Optimising architectural studio spaces: Applying a psychological needs framework to enhance student well-being. SAGE Open, 16(1) 1-22. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/21582440251407947 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Bello, A. O., Pepple, T. D., Amusa, T. T., Obioha, U., & Asaju, O. (2025). Evaluation of the impact of natural lighting and ventilation on user comfort in Lagos office buildings. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS), *10*(7), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100700130 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Bhatti, O. S., Ul Haq, M., & Khan, F. (2024). Impact of office and workplace design on job performance of project employees in Architecture, Engineering & Construction (AEC) industry of Pakistan. Journal for Current Sign, 320-333. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Christopoulos, I., & Mulville, M. (2025). Impact assessment of the spatial layouts of studios on the students' learning experience at architecture schools in HE, in the UK [Conference contribution]. Leeds Beckett University. https://hdl.handle.net/10779/leedsbeckett.30438500.v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Demirel, F., & Ozçetin, Z. (2024). A study on the acoustic comfort evaluation in educational buildings: Bozok University case. In Springer proceedings. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Feige, A., Wallbaum, H., Janser, M., & Windlinger, L. (2013). Impact of sustainable office buildings on occupants' comfort and productivity. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, *15*(1), 7-34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Haynes, B. P. (2008). The impact of office layout on productivity. Journal of Facilities Management, *6*(3), 189-201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Hussein, A. Y., & Mustafa, F. A. (2023). Architecture students’ self-report well-being assessment based on quality learning environment in design studio. Cihan University-Erbil Scientific Journal CUESJ, *7*(1), 21-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Lee, P. J., Lee, B. K., Jeon, J. Y., Zhang, M., & Kang, J. (2015). Impact of noise on self-rated job satisfaction and health in open-plan offices: A structural equation modelling approach. Ergonomics, *59*(2), 222-234. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Makaremi, N., Yildirim, S., Morgan, G. T., Touchie, M. F., Jakubiec, J. A., & Robinson, J. B. (2024). Impact of classroom environment on student wellbeing in higher education: A systematic review. Building and Environment, *265*, Article 111958. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Makun, C. Y., Anikor, E. M., Obi-George, C. L., & Akande, O. (2024). Evaluation of interactive spaces for enhanced learning in architecture department buildings in Niger State, Nigeria. ArtGRID - Journal of Architecture Engineering and Fine Arts, *6*(1), 96-110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Makun, C. Y., & Lawal, L. A. (2025). Effects of exposure to noise on mental performance and emotional well-being of students at a school in Kaduna, Nigeria. Federal University of Technology, Minna. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Obi-George, L. C., Ifebi, O. C., Adegoke, S. A., Nzewi, N. U., Eze, C. J., & Maduka, N. M. (2025). Examining the impact and perception of thermal comfort on student performance in architectural studios. Federal University of Technology, Minna. Journal of Technology in Architecture, Design, and Planning. 3(1) 1-12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Sadykova, Z., & Almasbayeva, A. (2024). Ergonomics of an art studio: Methodology for comfortable and productive creativity. Problems of Engineering and Professional Education, *72*(1), 50-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Stanton, A., Zandvliet, D., Dhaliwal, R., & Black, T. (2016). Understanding students' experiences of well-being in learning environments. Higher Education Studies, *6*(3), 90-99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Tonye, T. A., Favour, I. I., Olaoye, G., Uju, P. C., Ibitoye, O. A., & Adekunle, S. B. (2025). The impact of lighting and circulation on movement systems in community centres. International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science (IJLTEMAS), *14*(8), 200-208. https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1408000025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Wargocki, P., Porras-Salazar, J., & Contreras-Espinoza, S. (2019). The relationship between classroom temperature and children's performance in school. Building and Environment, *157*, 197-204. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Yardimci, Y. C. (2024). A research on architects' comfort conditions in working environments. Sakarya University Journal of Science, *28*(3), 496-504. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Enhancing Formation Control of Multi Agent Systems Using Ann Based Technique
- Improving Sliding Mode Control with Chattering Reduction using Fuzzy Based Technique
- Cooking Quality, Fasting Blood Glucose, Glycemic Index and Load of High–Fiber Noodles Made from Wheat, Tiger Nut Residue and Cassava Flour Blends
- Matrix Rhythm Therapy Versus Interferential Therapy Combined with Lumbar Stabilization Exercises in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Comparative Trial
- Formulation and Sensory Evaluation of Functional Cake Prepared from Sweet Potato Powder