AgriTrack Digital Ordering Monitoring System for Ttangkkuet Green Farm.

The AgriTrack Digital Ordering Monitoring System for Ttangkkuet Green Farm is designed to resolve the challenges faced by the farm owner in managing their business operations. The system focuses on improving the way orders are handled by providing features such as order management, receipt printing, order tracking, customer reviews, and product customization. This study follows the Agile Methodology, which allows the system to be built step by step, with regular feedback to make sure it meets the needs of the users. The system includes important features such as a responsive web-based platform, real-time product availability tracking, manual confirmation and notifications, OTP verification, and digital payment options. To better understand the problems faced by the farm owner—such as receiving orders and writing receipts by hand—the researchers conducted interviews, direct observations, and reviewed related studies. A purposive sampling method was used to choose the right people to take part in the study. A total of 9 participants were selected, including the farm owner, business partners, and customers. To measure how well the system is accepted and used, a Likert Scale survey will be given to the participants. After collecting the responses, statistical analysis will be done to check the usability and performance of the system. By solving the issues in the current process, the AgriTrack Digital Ordering Monitoring System aims to improve how reservations and orders are managed. This will help make operations smoother and increase customer satisfaction at Ttangkkuet Green Farm.

Tracking order, Managing Orders, customer reviews

1. G. Taher, "E-Commerce: Advantages and Limitations," ResearchGate, 2021. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350235862 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. B. Milford, G. Lien, and M. Reed, "Different sales channels for different farmers: Local and mainstream marketing of organic fruits and vegetables in Norway," Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 87, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.08.018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. P. Gittins and L. Morland, "Is Growing Better ripe for development? Creating an urban farm for social impact," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 2021. doi: 10.1177/14657503211000576 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. P. Warsaw, S. Archambault, A. He, and S. Miller, "The Economic, Social, and Environmental Impacts of Farmers Markets: Recent Evidence from the US," Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 6, p. 3423, 2021. doi: 10.3390/su13063423 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Y. X. Lim and W. Zhang, "Examining the Impact of Source-product Congruence and Sponsorship Disclosure on the Communicative Effectiveness of Instagram Influencers," arXiv preprint, arXiv:2208.02453, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. VIPIN JAIN1, BINDOO MALVIYA, SATYENDRA ARYA (2021), An Overview of Electronic Commerce (e-Commerce). Retrieved on March 12, 2025 from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vipin-Jain-13/publication/351775073_An_Overview_of_Electronic_Commerce_e-Commerce/links/60a8d9af45851522bc0aed79/An-Overview-of-Electronic-Commerce-e-Commerce.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Zulkarnain Kedah (2023), Use of E-Commerce in The World of Business. Retrieved on March 12, 2025 from https://journal.pandawan.id/sabda/article/view/273/259 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Giller, K.E., Delaune, T., Silva, J.V. et al. (2021), The future of farming: Who will produce our food?. Retrieved on April 22, 2025 from https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-021-01184-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kamran Zendehdel, Brian W. Sloboda , and Eric Chad Horner (2021), Economic Impact Analysis of Farmers’ Markets in the Washington, DC Metropolitan Area: Evidence of a Circular Economy. Retrieved on April 22, 2025 from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7333 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kusse Haile, Engida Gebre & Agegnehu Workye (2022), Determinants of market participation among smallholder farmers in Southwest Ethiopia: double-hurdle model approach. Retrieved on April 22, 2025 from https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-022-00358-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Olaf Erenstein, Jordan Chamberlin and Kai Sonder (2021), Farms worldwide: 2020 and2030 outlook. Retrieved on April 22, 2025 from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epdf/10.1177/00307270211025539?src=getftr&utm_source=sciencedirect_contenthosting&getft_integrator=sciencedirect_contenthosting [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Peter Gittins, Leigh Morland (2021), Is ‘Growing Better’ ripe for development? Creating an urban farm for social impact. Retrieved on April 22, 2025 from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/14657503211000576#fn1-14657503211000576 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Phillip Warsaw, Steven Archambault, Arden He, Stacy Miller (2021), The Economic, Social, and Environmental Impacts of Farmers Markets: Recent Evidence from the US. Retrieved on April 22, 2025 from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3423 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Enhancing Formation Control of Multi Agent Systems Using Ann Based Technique
• Improving Sliding Mode Control with Chattering Reduction using Fuzzy Based Technique
• Cooking Quality, Fasting Blood Glucose, Glycemic Index and Load of High–Fiber Noodles Made from Wheat, Tiger Nut Residue and Cassava Flour Blends
• Matrix Rhythm Therapy Versus Interferential Therapy Combined with Lumbar Stabilization Exercises in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Comparative Trial
• Formulation and Sensory Evaluation of Functional Cake Prepared from Sweet Potato Powder