Mapping the Catastrophic Wear Zone: A Threshold-Based Re-Analysis of Taguchi-Optimized HSS Tool Life in Dry Aluminum Turning
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
This study re-examines experimental data from a Taguchi L9 orthogonal array (cutting speed: 34–134 m/min, feed: 0.1–0.3 mm/rev, depth of cut: 1–3 mm) to identify a threshold-based "catastrophic wear zone" for HSS tool operation in dry turning of aluminum. While conventional Taguchi optimization ranks cutting speed as the most influential factor affecting tool life (delta S/N = 16.14 vs. 6.87 for feed and 1.10 for depth), a closer inspection reveals a non-linear deterioration pattern. All three experiments conducted at 134 m/min produced the lowest tool life responses (45, 26, and 17 minutes), representing a 73.6% reduction compared to the optimal parameter combination. The S/N ratio collapses from 44.80 (at 90 m/min) to 28.66 (at 134 m/min)—a 36% deterioration in signal-to-noise performance. This threshold behavior establishes 134 m/min as a critical speed boundary beyond which tool life becomes both significantly shorter and highly inconsistent. Based on these findings, a recommended safe operating window is proposed: cutting speed ≤ 90 m/min, feed ≤ 0.2 mm/rev, and depth of cut ≤ 2 mm, with a red-flag warning against simultaneous use of 134 m/min and 0.3 mm/rev. The practical implications for TVET workshops, where unplanned tool failure disrupts training schedules and increases material costs, are discussed.
Downloads
References
V. P. A. Ã, “The assessment of cutting tool wear,” vol. 44, pp. 637–647, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2003.11.006.
A. Basil Abdulwahhab, “A Study of the Effect of (Cutting Speed, Feed Rate and depth of cut) on Surface Roughness in the Milling Machining,” Eng. Technol. J., vol. 33, no. 8A, pp. 1785–1797, 2015, doi: 10.30684/etj. 2015.108823.
C. Bh, A. C. Gowda, and U. Pa, “Study on Cutting Tool Life,” J. Eng. Sci., vol. 2, IS, no. July, 2014.
S. Campocasso, J. P. Costes, G. Fromentin, S. Bissey-Breton, and G. Poulachon, “A generalised geometrical model of turning operations for cutting force modelling using edge discretisation,” Appl. Math. Model., vol. 39, no. 21, pp. 6612–6630, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.02.008.
C. Felhő and T. Namboodri, “Statistical Analysis of Cutting Force and Vibration in Turning X5CrNi18-10 Steel,” Appl. Sci., vol. 15, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.3390/app15010054.
K. Kadirgama, B. Mohammad, H. Al-ani, and M. M. Noor, “Cutting force prediction model by FEA and RSM when machining Hastelloy C-22HS with 90 ° holder,” vol. 67, no. June, pp. 421–427, 2008.
M. P. Kumar, “Study on Tool Life and its Failure Mechanisms,” vol. 2, no. 04, pp. 126–131, 2015.
S. J. Ojolo and O. Ogunkomaiya, “A study of effects of machining parameters on tool life,” vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 183–199, 2014, doi: 10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140305.19.
D. Johansson, Tool Life and Cutting Data Modelling in Metal Cutting Testing, Modelling and Cost Performance Document Version : Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of record. 2019.
S. K. Sikdar and M. Chen, “Relationship between tool flank wear area and component forces in single point turning,” vol. 128, pp. 210–215, 2002.
K. Salonitis and A. Kolios, “Reliability assessment of cutting tool life based on surrogate approximation methods,” vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 1197–1208, 2014.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in our journal are licensed under CC-BY 4.0, which permits authors to retain copyright of their work. This license allows for unrestricted use, sharing, and reproduction of the articles, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors and the source.