00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Mapping the Catastrophic Wear Zone: A Threshold-Based Re-Analysis of Taguchi-Optimized HSS Tool Life in Dry Aluminum Turning

Authors

Shewangizaw Abu Abate

Manufacturing Industry Development Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (ET)

Taddese Yohanesse Tegegne

Manufacturing Industry Development Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (ET)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600092

Subject Category: Mapping

Volume/Issue: 15/6 | Page No: 1279-1287

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-08

Published: 2026-07-08

Abstract

This study re-examines experimental data from a Taguchi L9 orthogonal array (cutting speed: 34–134 m/min, feed: 0.1–0.3 mm/rev, depth of cut: 1–3 mm) to identify a threshold-based "catastrophic wear zone" for HSS tool operation in dry turning of aluminum. While conventional Taguchi optimization ranks cutting speed as the most influential factor affecting tool life (delta S/N = 16.14 vs. 6.87 for feed and 1.10 for depth), a closer inspection reveals a non-linear deterioration pattern. All three experiments conducted at 134 m/min produced the lowest tool life responses (45, 26, and 17 minutes), representing a 73.6% reduction compared to the optimal parameter combination. The S/N ratio collapses from 44.80 (at 90 m/min) to 28.66 (at 134 m/min)—a 36% deterioration in signal-to-noise performance. This threshold behavior establishes 134 m/min as a critical speed boundary beyond which tool life becomes both significantly shorter and highly inconsistent. Based on these findings, a recommended safe operating window is proposed: cutting speed ≤ 90 m/min, feed ≤ 0.2 mm/rev, and depth of cut ≤ 2 mm, with a red-flag warning against simultaneous use of 134 m/min and 0.3 mm/rev. The practical implications for TVET workshops, where unplanned tool failure disrupts training schedules and increases material costs, are discussed.

Keywords

Tool wear; Taguchi method; HSS tool; threshold analysis; aluminum turning; catastrophic wear

Downloads

References

1. V. P. A. Ã, “The assessment of cutting tool wear,” vol. 44, pp. 637–647, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2003.11.006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. A. Basil Abdulwahhab, “A Study of the Effect of (Cutting Speed, Feed Rate and depth of cut) on Surface Roughness in the Milling Machining,” Eng. Technol. J., vol. 33, no. 8A, pp. 1785–1797, 2015, doi: 10.30684/etj. 2015.108823. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. C. Bh, A. C. Gowda, and U. Pa, “Study on Cutting Tool Life,” J. Eng. Sci., vol. 2, IS, no. July, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. S. Campocasso, J. P. Costes, G. Fromentin, S. Bissey-Breton, and G. Poulachon, “A generalised geometrical model of turning operations for cutting force modelling using edge discretisation,” Appl. Math. Model., vol. 39, no. 21, pp. 6612–6630, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.02.008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. C. Felhő and T. Namboodri, “Statistical Analysis of Cutting Force and Vibration in Turning X5CrNi18-10 Steel,” Appl. Sci., vol. 15, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.3390/app15010054. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. K. Kadirgama, B. Mohammad, H. Al-ani, and M. M. Noor, “Cutting force prediction model by FEA and RSM when machining Hastelloy C-22HS with 90 ° holder,” vol. 67, no. June, pp. 421–427, 2008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. M. P. Kumar, “Study on Tool Life and its Failure Mechanisms,” vol. 2, no. 04, pp. 126–131, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. S. J. Ojolo and O. Ogunkomaiya, “A study of effects of machining parameters on tool life,” vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 183–199, 2014, doi: 10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140305.19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. D. Johansson, Tool Life and Cutting Data Modelling in Metal Cutting Testing, Modelling and Cost Performance Document Version : Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of record. 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. S. K. Sikdar and M. Chen, “Relationship between tool flank wear area and component forces in single point turning,” vol. 128, pp. 210–215, 2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. K. Salonitis and A. Kolios, “Reliability assessment of cutting tool life based on surrogate approximation methods,” vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 1197–1208, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.