00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

A World Without Lies: A Critical Study on the Social, Psychological, Political, and Ethical Implications of Absolute Truthfulness

Authors

Dr. Sandeep Verma

Associate Professor and Head, Department of Humanities Faculty of Engineering, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, U.P., India (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600100

Subject Category: Without Lies

Volume/Issue: 15/6 | Page No: 1429-1464

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-11

Published: 2026-07-11

Abstract

Lying is a pervasive element of human communication, deeply embedded in interpersonal relationships, social interaction, political processes, economic transactions, psychological adaptation, and cultural practices. Although deception is generally regarded as morally questionable, it also performs important functional roles by maintaining social harmony, protecting individual privacy, managing interpersonal relationships, mitigating conflict, and facilitating social adaptation. The ability to distinguish truth from falsehood constitutes one of the defining characteristics of human communication and social organization. Conversely, truthfulness has long been regarded as one of the fundamental virtues of ethical communication and civilized society. Against this backdrop, this study critically examines the hypothetical scenario in which all human beings suddenly lose the ability to lie. Rather than treating this question merely as a philosophical thought experiment, the paper presents a systematic interdisciplinary conceptual analysis of the potential social, psychological, political, economic, ethical, and communicative consequences of absolute truthfulness, exploring how the disappearance of deception might fundamentally transform individuals, institutions, and society as a whole. The study adopts a qualitative conceptual research design grounded in critical interdisciplinary analysis and philosophical thought experimentation. It does not rely on empirical data; instead, it synthesizes established theories and scholarly literature from communication studies, psychology, sociology, political science, economics, philosophy, ethics, and classical Indian thought. The analysis is organized through a thematic comparative analytical framework, which systematically examines the functions currently served by deception and evaluates how their absence might reshape human behaviour and social institutions. Existing theoretical perspectives on trust, impression management, self-deception, governance, organizational behaviour, media ethics, and moral philosophy provide the analytical foundation for assessing both the potential benefits and unintended consequences of a lie-free society.

Keywords

Truth, Lying, Deception, Honesty, Communication, Ethics, Morality, Society, Social Trust, Transparency, Human Behaviour, Psychology, Sociology, Philosophy, Political Communication, Governance, Democracy, Privacy

Downloads

References

1. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aquinas, T. (1947). Summa Theologica (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans.). Benziger Brothers. (Original work published 1265–1274) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arendt, H. (1972). Crises of the Republic. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Aristotle. (2009). Nicomachean Ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Berlin, I. (1969). Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bok, S. (1978). Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. Pantheon Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M., & Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 979–995. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Denton, R. E., & Woodward, G. C. (1998). Political Communication in America (3rd ed.). Praeger. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Durkheim, E. (1984). The Division of Labor in Society (W. D. Halls, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1893) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Easton, D. (1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis. Norton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Gandhi, M. K. (1927). An Autobiography: The Story of My Experiments with Truth. Navajivan Publishing House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Beacon Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Held, D. (2006). Models of Democracy (3rd ed.). Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kant, I. (1996). The Metaphysics of Morals (M. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1797) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2021). The Elements of Journalism (4th ed.). Crown Publishing Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Locke, J. (1988). Two Treatises of Government (P. Laslett, Ed.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1689) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Manusmriti. (2005). The Laws of Manu (G. Bühler, Trans.). Low Price Publications. (Original work composed circa 2nd century BCE–3rd century CE) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. McNair, B. (2017). An Introduction to Political Communication (6th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory (6th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Mill, J. S. (2001). Utilitarianism. Hackett Publishing Company. (Original work published 1863) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Robertson, C. T., Eddy, K., & Nielsen, R. K. (2023). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2023. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Nye, J. S. (2008). The Powers to Lead. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. O'Neill, O. (2002). A Question of Trust: The BBC Reith Lectures 2002. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice (Revised ed.). Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 95–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Rogers, C. R. (1961). On Becoming a Person. Houghton Mifflin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Rousseau, J.-J. (1997). The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings (V. Gourevitch, Ed.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1762) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper & Brothers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Simmel, G. (1906). The sociology of secrecy and of secret societies. American Journal of Sociology, 11(4), 441–498. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Simmel, G. (1950). The Sociology of Georg Simmel (K. H. Wolff, Trans.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Information and the change in the paradigm in economics. American Economic Review, 92(3), 460–501. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Transparency in government. In R. Islam (Ed.), The Right to Tell: The Role of Mass Media in Economic Development (pp. 27–44). World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Talwar, V., & Lee, K. (2008). Social and cognitive correlates of children's lying behavior. Child Development, 79(4), 866–881. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 193–210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Trivers, R. (2011). The Folly of Fools: The Logic of Deceit and Self-Deception in Human Life. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Upanishads. (1996). The Principal Upanishads (S. Radhakrishnan, Trans.). HarperCollins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policymaking. Council of Europe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Warren, M. E. (Ed.). (1999). Democracy and Trust. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Weber, M. (1946). Politics as a vocation. In H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (pp. 77–128). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Westin, A. F. (1967). Privacy and Freedom. Atheneum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.