Seasharp: Gamifying C# Programming Education for Engaging Learning

This study introduces SeaSharp, a gamified web-based platform designed to enhance C# programming education for Information Technology students at Pangasinan State University, Alaminos City Campus. By incorporating immersive narratives, interactive coding challenges, and game mechanics such as levels, rewards, and leaderboards, SeaSharp aims to improve student engagement, motivation, and comprehension. The platform is designed using a User-Centered Design approach and integrates the Mechanics, Dynamics, and Aesthetics  framework to ensure a structured and engaging learning experience. This study presents main objectives include developing a compelling storyline, implementing innovative game mechanics, and integrating gamification principles to create an interactive and personalized learning environment. Additionally, this paper presents the acceptance level of the platform among students. Surveys and usability testing conducted with both students and instructors revealed significant improvements in motivation, participation, and problem-solving skills. Respondents highlighted the platform’s accessibility, interactivity, and ability to cater to diverse educational needs. By making complex programming concepts more engaging and intuitive, SeaSharp provides an effective alternative to traditional teaching methods. The integration of immediate feedback, structured progression, and interactive challenges fosters a deeper understanding of C# programming. The platform's success underscores the transformative potential of gamification in programming education. Future recommendations include expanding SeaSharp to cover advanced programming topics and integrating real-time analytics for adaptive feedback, further optimizing learning outcomes.

gamification, C# programming, education technology, student engagement, user-centered design

1. Albion, P. R., & Ertmer, P. A. (2019), The development of an instrument to measure preservice teachers’technology self-efficacy. Journal of Research on Technology in Education [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alha, K., et al. (2020), Well-rounded character development in storytelling games. Journal of Gaming Studies [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alhammad, M., & James, A. (2021), Enhancing Learning through Gamification: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Information and Education Technology [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Anderson, J. R., & Shneiderman, B. (2019), The craft of computer-based teaching. Educational Technology [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2021), What factors facilitate or inhibit the use of technology in education? Educational Technology Research and Development [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (2022), Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chen, C. M., Wang, Y. C., & Chen, M. H. (2020),Personalized learning and assessment: Exploring teachers’ perceptions and practices with technology-enhanced formative assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chen, S., Wang, L., & Zhang, Q. (2021), Enhancing Learning Through Simulation in Computer Aided Instruction. Computers & Education [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cheung, A. C., Slavin, R. E., & Kim, E. S. (2022), Effects of educational technology applications on reading outcomes for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chiang, T. H. C., Chen, Y. C., & Lin, C. Y. (2023), Game Based Learning and Game Mechanics: A Systematic Review of the Effects on Student Motivation and Learning Performance. Journal of Educational Technology & Society [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Collins, K. (2020), Effective storytelling in game design. Journal of Game Development [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Deterding, S., & Khaled, R. (2023). Enhancing player immersion through meaningful choices. Game Research Journal [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2021), Gamifying Education: What Is Known, What Is Believed and What Remains Uncertain: A Critical Review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Dunn, J., Loch, B., & McGovern, E. (2023), Insights into the relationship between the learning environment and self- directed learning readiness in first-year higher education students. Higher Education Research & Development [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ermi, L., & Mäyrä, F. (2020), Meaningful character arcs in games. Journal of Interactive Narratives [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Forsyth, K., & McMillan, J. H. (2021), The effects of computer-assisted instruction on reading achievement: A synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Examining Fatal Motorcycle Crashes in Malaysia: Rider Age, Road Attributes and Collision Partner Dynamics
• Resources-Blessed but Energy-Poor: A Critical Review of the Paradox of Energy Delivery in Nigeria
• Algorithmic Trading Bot Using Artificial Intelligence Supertrend Strategy
• Improving the Hybrid FSO/LI-FI/UWOC Network's
• Constructive Strategies for Enhancing Public Engagement in County Governance: A Focus on Nandi, Kenya, 2024.