A CFD-Based Comparative Analysis of Passive and Active Winglets for Narrow-Body Aircraft: Aerodynamic Performance, Fuel Efficiency, And Structural Trade-Offs

Abstract: This study presents a high-fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)-based comparative analysis of passive and active winglet configurations for narrow-body aircraft, focusing on aerodynamic performance, fuel efficiency, and structural trade-offs. While passive winglets are widely implemented due to their simplicity and drag-reduction benefits, active winglets offer adaptive geometry modulation, enhancing performance across various flight phases. Using an Airbus A320-style model, CFD simulations were conducted under standardized cruise conditions to quantify lift (Cl), drag (Cd), and the lift-to-drag ratio (L/D), complemented by scoring for structural complexity and maintenance. The results revealed that the active winglet outperformed the passive configuration, yielding a 10.5% L/D improvement and up to a 6.11% drag reduction during cruise, which translates to fuel savings of 3.87–6.11% across takeoff, cruise, and descent. However, the trade-off analysis highlighted significantly increased structural, actuation, and maintenance demands in active systems. As a solution, a hybrid winglet design—combining passive-flex tips with low-degree-of-freedom actuators—was proposed to balance aerodynamic gains with integration feasibility. The study contributes novel, CFD-driven, regionally contextualized data to sustainable aircraft design, particularly in the context of Southeast Asia’s aviation sector. Limitations include the lack of wind tunnel validation and simplified actuator modeling. Future research should focus on prototyping, aeroelastic simulation, and the integration of AI-based real-time control. The findings offer practical insights for fleet retrofitting and next-generation aerodynamic optimization.

active winglet, CFD simulation, aerodynamic optimization, fuel efficiency, structural trade-offs

1. Adams, E. (2017, June 21). Airbus' big bet to save its dying A380 super jumbo: Winglets. WIRED. https://www.wired.com/story/airbus-a380plus-winglets/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al Sidairi, K. A., & Rameshkumar, G. (2016). Design of winglet device for aircraft. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Engineering, 7(1). http://www.ijmse.org/Volume7/Issue1/paper4.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alamy. (2024). Airbus A320 Sharklets. Alamy. https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo/airbus-a320-sharklets-ctarbn.html?sortBy=relevant [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Amendola, G., Dimino, I., Concilio, A., Andreutti, G., Pecora, R., & Cascio, M.L. (2017). Preliminary Design Process for an Adaptive Winglet. https://doi.org/10.18178/IJMERR.7.1.83-92 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Aviation Partners. (2024). Types of blended winglets. Aviation Partners. https://www.aviationpartners.com/aircraft-winglets/types-blended-winglets/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bairwa, N., Jain, A., & Rajawat, A. (2016). A study on winglets and their contribution to aerodynamics. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 3(6), 2474-2478. https://www.irjet.net/archives/V3/i6/IRJET-V3I647.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Belferhat, S., Meftah, S. M. A., Yahiaoui, T., & Imine, B. (2013). Aerodynamic optimization of a winglet design. In EPJ Web of Conferences (Vol. 45, p. 01010). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20134501010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Berens, M. (2008). Potential of Multi-Winglet Systems to Improve Aircraft Performance. https://api-depositonce.tu-berlin.de/server/api/core/bitstreams/bac419f2-38a7-48a2-b30f-b2d6b418e37d/content [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bertorelli, P. (2019). Active winglets: Bolt-on efficiency. Aviation Consumer. https://www.aviationconsumer.com/aircraftreviews/aircraftstepups/active-winglets-bolt-on-efficiency/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bravo-Mosquera, P. D., Catalano, F. M., & Zingg, D. W. (2022). Unconventional aircraft for civil aviation: A review of concepts and design methodologies. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 131, 100813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2022.100813 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Caliskan, S. (2014). Experimental investigation of heat transfer in a channel with new winglet-type vortex generators. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 78, 604–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.07.043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chandra, D., & Misra, A. (2023). Impact of implementing winglets on the aerodynamic performance of an aircraft: A review. International Journal of Mechanical and Thermal Engineering. https://doi.org/10.22271/27078043.2023.v4.i1a.50 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Crawley, E.F. (1994). Intelligent structures for aerospace - A technology overview and assessment. AIAA Journal, 32, 1689-1699. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12161 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. De Breuker, R., Mkhoyan, T., Nazeer, N., Stuber, V.L., Wang, X., Mkhoyan, I., Groves, R.M., van der Zwaag, S., & Sodja, J. (2022). Overview of the SmartX Wing Technology Integrator. Actuators. https://doi.org/10.3390/act11100302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dimino, I., Andreutti, G., Moens, F., Fonte, F., Pecora, R., & Concilio, A. (2021). Integrated Design of a Morphing Winglet for Active Load Control and Alleviation of Turboprop Regional Aircraft. Applied Sciences, 11(5), 2439. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052439 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Eguea, J.P., Catalano, F.M., Abdalla, Á.M., Santana, L.D., Venner, C.H., & Silva, A.L. (2018). Study on a Camber Adaptive Winglet. 2018 Applied Aerodynamics Conference. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-3960 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Eightyknots. (2014, April 21). How do you choose the best wing tip device?. Recreational Flying. https://recreationalflying.com/forums/topic/22717-how-do-you-choose-the-best-wing-tip-device/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Fahd, R. (2021, August 31). Evolution of winglets. Medium. https://rahmanfahd.medium.com/evolution-of-winglets-8d5b3ba5a929 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Gatto, A., Bourdin, P., & Friswell, M. I. (2011). Experimental Investigation into the Control and Load Alleviation Capabilities of Articulated Winglets. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/789501 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Gavrilović, N. N., Rašuo, B. P., Dulikravich, G. S., & Parezanović, V. B. (2015). Commercial aircraft performance improvement using winglets. FME Transactions, 43(1), 1-8. https://hal.science/hal-04521084/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Guerrero, J., Wittkowski, K., & Sanguineti, M. (2019). Variable cant angle winglets for the improvement of aircraft flight performance. Meccanica, 55, 1917 - 1947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-020-01230-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Henderson, W., and Holmes, B., "Induced Drag - Historical Perspective," SAE Technical Paper 892341, 1989, https://doi.org/10.4271/892341. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kolappan, S., Manickam, I. N., Swikker, K. R. J., Gnanaraj, S. J. P., & Appadurai, M. (2022). Performance analysis of aircraft composite winglet. Materials Today: Proceedings, 62, 889-895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.061 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Majid, T., & Jo, B. W. (2020). Status and Challenges on Design and Implementation of Camber Morphing Mechanisms. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2021(1), 6399937. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6399937 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Maughmer, M. D. (2003). Design of winglets for high-performance sailplanes. Journal of aircraft, 40(6), 1099–1106. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.7220 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Maughmer, M., & Kunz, P. (1998). Sailplane winglet design. Technical Soaring, 22(4), 116–123. https://journals.sfu.ca/ts/index.php/ts/article/view/421 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Maughmer, M.D. (2006). The Design of Winglets for Low-Speed Aircraft. Technical Soaring, 30, 6173. http://www.mandhsoaring.com/Why%20Winglets/WL-IT.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Merryisha, S., & Rajendran, P. (2019). Review of Winglets on Tip Vortex, Drag and Airfoil Geometry. https://www.akademiabaru.com/doc/ARFMTSV63_N2_P218_237.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Monner, H. P., & Sinapius, M., et al. (2020). Active aerodynamic devices in civil aircraft: Current status and future perspectives. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 11, 795–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-020-00465-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Narayan, G., & John, B. (2016). Effect of winglets induced tip vortex structure on the performance of subsonic wings. Aerospace Science and Technology, 58, 328-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.08.031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Norris, G. (2021). Winglets evolve to boost efficiency across aircraft spectrum. Aviation Week. https://aviationweek.com/mro/aircraft-propulsion/winglets-evolve-boost-efficiency-across-aircraft-spectrum [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Öztürk, Ş., & Örs, İ. (2020). An overview for effects on aerodynamic performance of using winglets and wingtip devices on aircraft. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/An-overview-for-effects-on-aerodynamic-performance-%C3%96zt%C3%BCrk-%C3%96rs/b6e4fee8bcaa2bf1de9913ab62fbd8efb5e6d40b [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Panagiotou, P., Kaparos, P., & Yakinthos, K. (2014). Winglet design and optimization for a MALE UAV using CFD. Aerospace Science and Technology, 39, 190-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2014.09.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Paul, J.O., Gabriel, O.E., & Abbe, G. (2020). Active Tip Fins for Box Wing Aircraft. Recent Patents on Engineering, 14, 268-272. https://doi.org/10.2174/1872212113666190226162215 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Samuel Merryisha, & Parvathy Rajendran. (2024). Review of Winglets on Tip Vortex, Drag and Airfoil Geometry. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 63(2), 218–237. https://semarakilmu.com.my/journals/index.php/fluid_mechanics_thermal_sciences/article/view/3618 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Siliang, D., Qijun, Z., & Zhengfei, T. (2019). Numerical Simulation of the Effect of Different Number Leading Edge Winglets on the Fan-Wing Aerodynamic Characteristics. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2020(1), 8941453. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8941453 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Smith, M., Komerath, N., Ames, R., Wong, O., & Pearson, J. (2001). Performance analysis of a wing with multiple winglets. In 19th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference (p. 2407). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2001-2407 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. SOLTANI, M. R., MASDARI, M., & TIRANDAZ, M. R. (2017). Effect of an end plate on surface pressure distributions of two swept wings. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 30(5), 1631–1643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2017.07.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Tamarack Aerospace. (2024). Tamarack Active Winglet technology. Tamarack Aerospace Group. https://www.tamarackaero.com/technology [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Tobin, N., Hamed, A. M., & Chamorro, L. P. (2015). An experimental study on the effects of winglets on the wake and performance of a model wind turbine. Energies, 8(10), 11955-11972. https://doi.org/10.3390/en81011955 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Ursache, N.M., Melin, T., Isikveren, A.T., & Friswell, M.I. (2007). Morphing Winglets for Aircraft Multi-phase Improvement. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-7813 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Woodrow, E. (2019). Winglet evolution continues with active winglets. Aviation Maintenance Magazine. https://www.avm-mag.com/winglet-evolution-continues-with-active-winglets [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Wind Turbine Design for Low Wind Speed Applications: Advancing Renewable Energy Systems Through Wind Tunnel Experiments
• Fast Identification for Evidences in Crime Scene with Macroscopic Properties and Portable Techniques
• Evaluating the Impact of Hello Interval Timer on OSPF Performance for Real-Time Applications Using OPNET
• The Algorithmic Fortress: Ai-Powered Cybersecurity and Anti-Fraud in The Future of Fintech
• Accident Detection on Curved Roads Using Infrared Sensors in Hilly Regions A Case of Chadoora Tehsil, Badgam (J&K)