A Numerical and Analytical Framework for Estimating Water Pollution in A 3-D Aquatic Region Using Diffusion Model with Du Fort Frankel and Adomian Decomposition Methods
Authors
Tarjani Naik
Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Mathematics, Uka Tarsadia University, Bardoli, Gujarat (IN)
Mukesh Patel
Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, Uka Tarsadia University, Bardoli, Gujarat (IN)
Rachna Patel
Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Engineering, CGPIT, Uka Tarsadia University, Bardoli, Gujarat (IN)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1410000040
Subject Category: Mathematics
Volume/Issue: 14/10 | Page No: 302-316
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-07
Published: 2025-11-07
Abstract
Water pollution is an important environmental issue that affects human health, aquatic habitats, and the sustainability of natural resources. Reliable mathematical models that can forecast the behaviour of pollutants in three-dimension (3-D) water systems are needed to address this issue. In this study, a 3-D diffusion model is used to determine the periodic and location-based fluctuation of the pollutant concentration in water. Investigating the slow increase in pollution levels in a 3-D area and evaluating the precision of analytical and numerical approaches to diffusion-based pollution problems are the objectives of this work. Two approaches are used to accomplish this: the Adomian Decomposition Method (ADM), which is an analytical approach, and the Du Fort Frankel (DF) scheme, which is a numerical approach. Initial and boundary conditions required for the modelling are provided by experimented data (Exp. data) from a 3-D cuboid tank filled with water and introduced with an iodized salt water solution as the pollutant. Direct monitoring of pollution dispersion across time and space is made possible by this configuration, producing useful data for confirming the mathematical models. The results of the experiment verify that the levels of pollutants rise with time at each location in the 3-D region. When comparing the outcomes of the DF approach with Exp. data and ADM, an insignificant difference, measured in parts per million (PPM), is observed, demonstrating the reliability and strength of the suggested model. This study is important because it combines mathematical models and realistic observations to examine pollution of water in 3-D. The results show that the model is accurate and applicable to both controlled experiments and larger-scale water systems. Additionally, this work advances the mathematical solutions for diffusion equations and offers useful information for sustainable resource use, pollution control, and water quality evaluation.
Keywords
Water pollution, 3-D Diffusion equation, Du Fort Frankel method, Adomian Decomposition method
Downloads
References
1. Hanani Johari, Nursalasawati Rusli, and Zainab Yahya: Finite Difference Formulation for Prediction of Water Pollution. Materials Science and Engineering. (2018), doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/318/1/012005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. J. Bartram & R. Balance: Water quality monitoring: a practical guide to the design and implementation of freshwater quality studies and monitoring programmes. ResearchGate. (1996). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Busayamas Pimpunchata, Winston L. Sweatman, Graeme C. Wake, Wannapong Triampo, Aroon Parshotam: A mathematical model for pollution in a river and its remediation by aeration. Applied Mathematics Letters. 22(3), 304-308 (2009), doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2008.03.026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. G. Tchobanoglous, F.L. Burton: Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal and Reuse. Environment Science, Engineering, 3 ed., McGraw-Hill, New York. (2002). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. J. R. Zabadal, C. A. Poffal, S. B. Leite: Closed form solutions for water pollution problems-2. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures. 3(4), 377-392 (2006). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. J. B. Shukla, A. K. Misra, Peeyush Chandra: Mathematical modeling and analysis of the depletion of dissolved oxygen in eutrophied water bodies affected by organic pollutants. Nonlinear Analysis Real World Applications. 9(5), 1851-1865 (2008). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Nigar Sultana and Laek Sazzad Andallah: Investigation of Water Pollution in the River with Second-Order Explicit Finite Difference Scheme of Advection-Diffusion Equation and First-Order Explicit Finite Difference Scheme of Advection-Diffusion Equation. Mathematical Statistician and Engineering Applications. 71(2), 12-27 (2022), doi: 10.17762/msea.v71i2.62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Delong Wan, Huiping Zeng: Water environment mathematical model mathematical algorithm. 2nd International Symposium on Resource Exploration and Environmental Science. 170, (2018), doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/170/3/032133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Nopparat Pochai, Suwon Tangmanee, L. J. Crane, J. J. H. Miller: A Mathematical Model of Water Pollution Control Using the Finite Element Method. Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics. 6(1), 755-756 (2006), doi: 10.1002/pamm.200610358. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Tsegaye Simon, Purnachandra Rao Koya: Modeling and Numerical Simulation of River Pollution using Diffusion-Reaction Equation. American Journal of Applied Mathematics. 3(6), 335-340 (2015), doi: 10.11648/j.ajam.20150306.24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. R. V. Waghmare and S. B. Kiwne: Mathematical Modeling of Disposal of Pollutant in Rivers. International Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. 12(3), 835-842 (2017). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Abbas Parsaie, Amir Hamzeh Haghiabi: Computational Modeling of Pollution Transmission in Rivers. Applied Water Science. 7, 1213–1222 (2017), doi: 10.1007/s13201-015-0319-6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Safia Meddah, Abdelkader Saidane, Mohamed Hadjel, Omar Hireche: Pollutant Dispersion Modeling in Natural Streams Using the Transmission Line Matrix Method. Water. 7(9), 4932-4950 (2015), doi: 10.3390/w7094932. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Saravanan, N. Magesh: A comparison between the reduced Differential Transform Method and the Adomian Decomposition Method for the Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation. Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society. 21(3), 259-265 (2013). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Snehashish Chakraverty, Nisha Mahato, Perumandla Karunakar, Tharasi Dilleswar Rao: Advanced numerical and semi analytical methods for differential equations. Wiley Telecom. 119-130 (2019), doi: 10.1002/9781119423461.ch11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ahmad M. D. Al-Eybani: Adomian Decomposition Method and Differential Transform Method to solve the Heat Equations with a power nonlinearity. Ahmad M. D. Al-Eybani International Journal of Engineering Research and Application. 5(2), 94-98 (2015). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Srimanta Pal: Numerical Methods: Principles, Analysis and Algorithms. Oxford University Press. (2009). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Salih: Finite Difference Method for Parabolic PDE. Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram. (2013). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Plamen Koev: Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Spring. (2005). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. M. Thongmoon, R. McKibbin and S. Tangmanee: Numerical solution of a 3-D advection-dispersion model for pollutant transport. Thai Journal of Mathematics. 5(1), 91-108 (2012). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Dr. H. A. Radwan, Dr. amaar Elattar, Dr. Rania khmes: Global Water Resources. Pella Conference on Water. 1, (2010). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Suaad Hadi Hassan Al-Taai: Water pollution Its causes and effects. IOP conference series Earth and Environment Science. 790(1), (2021), doi:10.1088/1755-1315/790/1/012026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Zafenate Infinity: Determining the Diffusivity Coefficients for the Different NaCl Concentrations Laboratory Assignment. Report on the Liquid Diffusion Coefficient of NaCl by BSC Gumede @ UJ Department of Chemical Engineering. (2022). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Abdul-Majid Wazwaz: A comparison between Adomian decomposition method and Taylor series method in the series solutions. Applied Mathematicsand Computation. 97 (1), 37-44 (1998). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Rayne of the Wine Country: Decoding your water test: Understanding water hardness and TDS levels. Rayne of the Wine Country Blog, (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. U.S. Geological Survey: Hardness of Water. Water Science School, U.S. Geological Survey (2018). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Decision Tree and Automatic Linear Modeling Approaches to Predict Body Weight in Indigenous Sabi Sheep and Matebele Goat Females of Zimbabwe
- Microcontroller – Based Automatic Railway Crossing Control and Track Obstacle Monitoring System
- Modelling the Role of Absorptive Capacity in Foreign Direct Investment - Economic Growth Nexus: A Focus on South Africa’s Manufacturing Sector
- AI-Powered Wristband for Accurate BAC Monitoring Using Smart Data Fusion
- Climate Change Impacts on Different Regions