“Incentive Timeliness, Workload and Job Satisfaction as Determinants of Community Contribution: A study on the Social Cost–Benefit (SCB) Analysis of ASHA Workers in Kerala”
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, appoints Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) as health facilitators under the National Rural Health Mission. Local women are chosen and trained at the village level to provide health awareness and services. Their familiarity with the local culture and socioeconomic status of families or individuals allows them to effectively communicate health-related information and mobilize households to engage with formal healthcare services. The ASHAs perform a wide range of tasks, such as providing basic healthcare information, family welfare, immunisation services, maternal and child health promotion, health counselling, maintaining health records, and community-based health projects. By serving as a vital conduit between the rural community and the public health system, they are significant backers of India's National Rural Health Mission. In Kerala, ASHAs now play a much larger role, which puts more strain on their time and energy. Their pay is primarily determined by their performance. This study examines the social cost–benefit relationship and job satisfaction of ASHA workers in Kerala, focusing on the timeliness of incentives, perceived workload, and their influence on community contribution. A total of 300 samples were selected from fourteen districts of Kerala. Primary data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression. The study finds that timely incentive distribution and manageable workload are key determinants of job satisfaction, which in turn enhances community participation. The results highlight the need for timely payments and workload rationalisation to strengthen ASHAs’ motivation and optimise their contribution to public health delivery.
Downloads
References
Books and Academic Texts
• Berman, P., & Bossert, T. (2000). Health Sector Reform in Developing Countries: Making Health Development Sustainable. Harvard University Press.
• Park, K. (2023). Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine. M/s Banarsidas Bhanot Publishers.
• Gupta, S. (2019). Community Health Nursing. Elsevier.
• Rao, K. S. (2018). Health Policy and Programmes in India. NIPA.
Journal Articles
• Bajpai, N., & Dholakia, R. H. (2011). Improving the performance of Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) in India. Working Paper Series, Columbia Global Centres.
• Kok, M. et al. (2014). Which intervention design factors influence performance of community health workers? A systematic review. Health Policy and Planning, 30(9), 1207–1227.
• Nandi, S., & Schneider, H. (2014). Addressing social determinants of health through community health workers in India. BMJ Global Health.
• Scott, K., & Shanker, S. (2010). Evaluating Community Health Worker programmes in India. Health Research Policy and Systems, 8(1), 1-10.
• Prinja, S., Mazumder, S., et al. (2018). Cost-effectiveness of the ASHA program in improving maternal and child health outcomes. Indian Paediatrics, 55(4), 292-298.
• Agarwal, S., Kirkpatrick, S. (2017). Role of ICT intervention in ASHA functioning. Journal of Health Communication, 22(6), 510-518.
• Ginneken, N. V., Lewin, S., & Berridge, V. (2010). The emergence of community health worker programmes in the late twentieth century. Social Science & Medicine, 71(1), 159-167.
Government & Institutional Reports
• Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. (2020). ASHA Programme Guidelines (Updated).
• National Health Mission (2014-2023). Annual Reports of ASHA Training, Incentives and Performance.
• MoHFW (2021). National Rural Health Mission: Status and Progress Report.
• NITI Aayog (2018). Strategy for New India @ 75 – Health Sector Chapter.
• NHSRC (2011, 2016, 2022). ASHA Evaluation Reports and Progress Indicators in India.
• Kerala State Health Department (2019-2024). ASHA Performance and Incentive Disbursal Reports.
• UNICEF & WHO (2020). Community Health Systems Strengthening Report.
• World Bank (2018). Investing in Health Workforce to Achieve Universal Health Coverage.
Studies Related to Workload, Incentives & Job Satisfaction
• Singh, D., Nair, N., et al. (2016). Compensation mechanisms for community health workers in India: Review and recommendations. Global Health Action.
• Sharma, R., & Mohan, U. (2019). Job satisfaction among ASHAs: A cross-sectional study in Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Community Medicine.
• Neogi, S. B., et al. (2017). Workload assessment of frontline health workers in India. Journal of Family Welfare.
• Sarma, A. (2020). Factors influencing performance of ASHA workers. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health.
• Kumar, P. et al. (2018). Mediating role of job satisfaction between incentives and community engagement. Journal of Health Management.
Kerala-Focused Studies
• Kannan, V., & Madhavan, S. (2022). ASHA functioning and public health outcomes in Kerala. Kerala Journal of Public Health.
• Joseph, A., & Varghese, B. (2020). ASHA workers in Kerala: Issues, challenges and performance assessment. Journal of Health and Development.
• State Health Systems Resource Centre Kerala (SHSRCK). ASHA Program Review Reports, 2018-2023.
• Devika, J. (2016). Gendered labour and public health workers in Kerala. Economic and Political Weekly.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in our journal are licensed under CC-BY 4.0, which permits authors to retain copyright of their work. This license allows for unrestricted use, sharing, and reproduction of the articles, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors and the source.