00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

“Incentive Timeliness, Workload and Job Satisfaction as Determinants of Community Contribution: A study on the Social Cost–Benefit (SCB) Analysis of ASHA Workers in Kerala”

Authors

Dr Priya Mariyat

Associate Professor of Mathematics, Maharaja’s (Government Autonomous) College, Ernakulam, Kerala. (IN)

Dr G N Prakash

Associate Professor of Mathematics, Maharaja’s (Government Autonomous) College, Ernakulam, Kerala. (IN)

Dr Aelyamma P J

Associate Professor of Mathematics, Maharaja’s (Government Autonomous) College, Ernakulam, Kerala. (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1412000039

Subject Category: Management and Statistical Analysis

Volume/Issue: 14/12 | Page No: 430-439

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-01

Published: 2026-01-01

Abstract

The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, appoints Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) as health facilitators under the National Rural Health Mission. Local women are chosen and trained at the village level to provide health awareness and services. Their familiarity with the local culture and socioeconomic status of families or individuals allows them to effectively communicate health-related information and mobilize households to engage with formal healthcare services. The ASHAs perform a wide range of tasks, such as providing basic healthcare information, family welfare, immunisation services, maternal and child health promotion, health counselling, maintaining health records, and community-based health projects. By serving as a vital conduit between the rural community and the public health system, they are significant backers of India's National Rural Health Mission. In Kerala, ASHAs now play a much larger role, which puts more strain on their time and energy. Their pay is primarily determined by their performance. This study examines the social cost–benefit relationship and job satisfaction of ASHA workers in Kerala, focusing on the timeliness of incentives, perceived workload, and their influence on community contribution. A total of 300 samples were selected from fourteen districts of Kerala. Primary data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression. The study finds that timely incentive distribution and manageable workload are key determinants of job satisfaction, which in turn enhances community participation. The results highlight the need for timely payments and workload rationalisation to strengthen ASHAs’ motivation and optimise their contribution to public health delivery.

Keywords

Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs), Incentive Timeliness, Perceived Workload, Job Satisfaction, Community Contribution, Social Cost–Benefit Analysis

Downloads

References

1. Books and Academic Texts [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. • Berman, P., & Bossert, T. (2000). Health Sector Reform in Developing Countries: Making Health Development Sustainable. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. • Park, K. (2023). Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine. M/s Banarsidas Bhanot Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. • Gupta, S. (2019). Community Health Nursing. Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. • Rao, K. S. (2018). Health Policy and Programmes in India. NIPA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Journal Articles [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. • Bajpai, N., & Dholakia, R. H. (2011). Improving the performance of Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) in India. Working Paper Series, Columbia Global Centres. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. • Kok, M. et al. (2014). Which intervention design factors influence performance of community health workers? A systematic review. Health Policy and Planning, 30(9), 1207–1227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. • Nandi, S., & Schneider, H. (2014). Addressing social determinants of health through community health workers in India. BMJ Global Health. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. • Scott, K., & Shanker, S. (2010). Evaluating Community Health Worker programmes in India. Health Research Policy and Systems, 8(1), 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. • Prinja, S., Mazumder, S., et al. (2018). Cost-effectiveness of the ASHA program in improving maternal and child health outcomes. Indian Paediatrics, 55(4), 292-298. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. • Agarwal, S., Kirkpatrick, S. (2017). Role of ICT intervention in ASHA functioning. Journal of Health Communication, 22(6), 510-518. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. • Ginneken, N. V., Lewin, S., & Berridge, V. (2010). The emergence of community health worker programmes in the late twentieth century. Social Science & Medicine, 71(1), 159-167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Government & Institutional Reports [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. • Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. (2020). ASHA Programme Guidelines (Updated). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. • National Health Mission (2014-2023). Annual Reports of ASHA Training, Incentives and Performance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. • MoHFW (2021). National Rural Health Mission: Status and Progress Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. • NITI Aayog (2018). Strategy for New India @ 75 – Health Sector Chapter. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. • NHSRC (2011, 2016, 2022). ASHA Evaluation Reports and Progress Indicators in India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. • Kerala State Health Department (2019-2024). ASHA Performance and Incentive Disbursal Reports. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. • UNICEF & WHO (2020). Community Health Systems Strengthening Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. • World Bank (2018). Investing in Health Workforce to Achieve Universal Health Coverage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Studies Related to Workload, Incentives & Job Satisfaction [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. • Singh, D., Nair, N., et al. (2016). Compensation mechanisms for community health workers in India: Review and recommendations. Global Health Action. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. • Sharma, R., & Mohan, U. (2019). Job satisfaction among ASHAs: A cross-sectional study in Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Community Medicine. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. • Neogi, S. B., et al. (2017). Workload assessment of frontline health workers in India. Journal of Family Welfare. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. • Sarma, A. (2020). Factors influencing performance of ASHA workers. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. • Kumar, P. et al. (2018). Mediating role of job satisfaction between incentives and community engagement. Journal of Health Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Kerala-Focused Studies [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. • Kannan, V., & Madhavan, S. (2022). ASHA functioning and public health outcomes in Kerala. Kerala Journal of Public Health. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. • Joseph, A., & Varghese, B. (2020). ASHA workers in Kerala: Issues, challenges and performance assessment. Journal of Health and Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. • State Health Systems Resource Centre Kerala (SHSRCK). ASHA Program Review Reports, 2018-2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. • Devika, J. (2016). Gendered labour and public health workers in Kerala. Economic and Political Weekly. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.