Communication-Aware Deep Learning Models for Real-Time Solar Energy Forecasting in Intelligent Power Networks

Precise solar power forecasting is critical for the stability and efficiency of modern intelligent power networks. However, the reliability of these forecasts is often compromised by communication network impairments, such as latency and packet loss, occurring between solar plants and control centers. This paper proposes a Communication-Aware Long Short-Term Memory (Comm-Aware LSTM) framework designed to integrate network-state information directly into the forecasting process. We model the system using a distributed communication topology consisting of solar plants, edge nodes, and cloud-based control centers.

Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model significantly outperforms traditional Baseline LSTM architectures under varying network conditions. Specifically, the Comm-Aware LSTM exhibits superior training convergence, achieving lower Mean Squared Error (MSE) while maintaining a negligible computational overhead—adding only 1.6 more trainable parameters and approximately 0.3 of inference latency. Correlation analysis further reveals that by explicitly accounting for latency-induced errors, the model provides robust predictions even in high-latency scenarios 0.5s. This research confirms that communication-aware deep learning architectures are essential for the next generation of resilient, edge-integrated smart grids.

Solar Power Forecasting, Comm-Aware LSTM, Intelligent Power Networks, Communication Latency

1. H. Zhang, J. Zhao, and Y. Li, “Short-term solar power forecasting using deep learning: A review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 156, pp. 1–18, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. A. Mellit, A. Massi Pavan, and V. Lughi, “Advanced methods for photovoltaic output power forecasting: A review,” Applied Energy, vol. 288, pp. 1–20, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Y. Wang, Q. Chen, T. Hong, and C. Kang, “Review of smart meter data analytics: Applications, methodologies, and challenges,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 3125–3148, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, “Long short-term memory,” Neural Computation, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735–1780, 1997. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. A. Graves, A. Mohamed, and G. Hinton, “Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp. 6645–6649, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. K. Greff et al., “LSTM: A search space odyssey,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2222–2232, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. J. Lago, F. De Ridder, and B. De Schutter, “Forecasting spot electricity prices: Deep learning approaches and empirical comparison,” Energy, vol. 221, pp. 1–13, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. T. Hong and S. Fan, “Probabilistic electric load forecasting: A tutorial review,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 914–938, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. X. Liu, Z. Lin, and J. Wen, “Short-term photovoltaic power forecasting based on LSTM neural network,” Energy Procedia, vol. 158, pp. 521–526, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. A. Vaswani et al., “Attention is all you need,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, pp. 5998–6008, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Z. Wu et al., “A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 4–24, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. M. Chen, U. Challita, W. Saad, C. Yin, and M. Debbah, “Artificial neural networks-based machine learning for wireless networks: A tutorial,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 3039–3071, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. N. Kato et al., “Ten challenges in advancing machine learning technologies toward 6G,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 96–103, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. A. Goldsmith, Wireless Communications, Cambridge University Press, 2005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. M. Chiang et al., “Fog and IoT: An overview of research opportunities,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 854–864, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Y. Mao, C. You, J. Zhang, K. Huang, and K. Letaief, “A survey on mobile edge computing,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 2322–2358, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. L. Yang, J. Zhang, and H. Poor, “Delay-aware learning for communication-efficient edge intelligence,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1–14, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. J. Chen and X. Ran, “Deep learning with edge computing: A review,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 107, no. 8, pp. 1655–1674, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. M. Mohammadi et al., “Deep learning for IoT big data and streaming analytics: A survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2923–2960, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. R. Deng et al., “Communication-aware energy management in smart grids,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. J. Zhao, F. Wen, Z. Dong, Y. Xue, and K. Wong, “Optimal dispatch of electric vehicles and wind power using enhanced particle swarm optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 889–899, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. A. Ahmad et al., “A review on applications of ANN and deep learning in smart grids,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 136, pp. 1–17, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 770–778, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. D. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” International Conference on Learning Representations, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. P. Pinson, “Very short-term probabilistic forecasting of wind power,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 877–885, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. S. Makridakis, E. Spiliotis, and V. Assimakopoulos, “Statistical and machine learning forecasting methods: Concerns and ways forward,” PLOS ONE, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1–26, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. A. Botterud et al., “Demand flexibility and renewable energy integration,” IEEE Proceedings, vol. 108, no. 9, pp. 1–15, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Y. Lecun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” Nature, vol. 521, pp. 436–444, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. IEEE Task Force on Smart Grid Communications, “IEEE standard for smart grid interoperability,” IEEE Std 2030, 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. F. Hutter, L. Kotthoff, and J. Vanschoren, Automated Machine Learning, Springer, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Students' Perception Towards Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education in India
• Strategic Leadership and Cybersecurity Readiness in Digitally Transforming Organisations
• Spatial Distribution of Tourism Infrastructure in Awka, Onitsha and Nnewi Urban Areas of Anambra State.
• Emerging Technologies, Education and Skill Development for A Sustainable Blue Economy in Nigeria.
• Quantum Dot–Based Solar Cells: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Prospects