Artificial Intelligence and Financial-Sector Supervision in Africa: Opportunities, Risks and a Framework for Responsible Adoption.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in financial services and supervision, yet financial institutions and FinTech firms are adopting it faster than many African regulators can effectively oversee it. This study examined the applications, opportunities, risks and regulatory conditions associated with AI-enabled financial-sector supervision in Africa. It combined a systematic literature review with comparative regulatory analysis covering publications issued between January 2020 and July 2026. Evidence was retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, SSRN, the IMF, World Bank, Bank for International Settlements, African Development Bank and relevant African regulatory authorities. Following PRISMA procedures, 565 records were identified, 141 duplicates were removed, and 424 records were screened. After full-text and quality assessments, 56 publications were included in the final thematic synthesis. Regulatory arrangements in Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya and South Africa were compared across AI policy, SupTech initiatives, data protection, cybersecurity, consumer protection, regulatory sandboxes, institutional capacity and accountability. The findings showed that AI could strengthen fraud detection, risk-based supervision, early-warning systems, regulatory-reporting analysis and consumer monitoring. However, poor data quality, algorithmic bias, limited explainability, privacy and cybersecurity risks, skills shortages and vendor dependence constrained responsible adoption. South Africa demonstrated the strongest disclosed financial-sector AI readiness, while Kenya had the clearest national AI strategy. Nigeria and Ghana had important digital-finance and cybersecurity foundations but limited publicly documented AI-enabled supervisory applications. The study developed an African Responsible AI–Financial Supervision Framework comprising six connected pillars and a phased adoption cycle. It recommends proportionate implementation, common model-validation standards, stronger inter-agency cooperation, shared regional infrastructure and independent oversight.

artificial intelligence; financial-sector supervision; SupTech; responsible AI; financial regulation; Africa

1. Aldboush, H. H. H., & Ferdous, M. (2023). Building trust in fintech: An analysis of ethical and privacy considerations in the intersection of big data, AI, and customer trust. International Journal of Financial Studies, 11(3), Article 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs11030090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alshahrani, A., Dennehy, D., & Mäntymäki, M. (2022). An attention-based view of AI assimilation in public sector organizations: The case of Saudi Arabia. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), Article 101617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101617 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bach, T. A., Kaarstad, M., Solberg, E., & Babic, A. (2025). Insights into suggested responsible AI practices in real-world settings: A systematic literature review. AI and Ethics, 5, 3185–3232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00648-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bahoo, S., Cucculelli, M., Goga, X., & Mondolo, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence in finance: A comprehensive review through bibliometric and content analysis. SN Business & Economics, 4, Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-023-00618-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Beerman, K., Prenio, J., & Zamil, R. (2021). Suptech tools for prudential supervision and their use during the pandemic (FSI Insights No. 37). Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights37.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chen, Y., Zhao, C., Xu, Y., Nie, C., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Deep learning in financial fraud detection: Innovations, challenges, and applications. Data Science and Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2025.08.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Crisanto, J. C., Leuterio, C. B., Prenio, J., & Yong, J. (2024). Regulating AI in the financial sector: Recent developments and main challenges (FSI Insights No. 63). Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights63.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Daníelsson, J., Macrae, R., & Uthemann, A. (2022). Artificial intelligence and systemic risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 140, Article 106290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106290 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dohotaru, M., Prisacaru, M., Shin, J. H., & Palta, Y. (2025). AI for risk-based supervision: Another “nice to have” tool or a game-changer? World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/4f8b828d-3eb0-4f16-a816-b5143c414e70 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Financial Stability Board. (2024). The financial stability implications of artificial intelligence. https://www.fsb.org/2024/11/the-financial-stability-implications-of-artificial-intelligence/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fundira, M., & Mbohwa, C. (2025). AI ethics in banking services: A systematic and bibliometric review of regulatory and consumer perspectives. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5, Article 319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00432-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Khanfar, A. A., Kiani Mavi, R., Iranmanesh, M., & Gengatharen, D. (2026). Determinants of artificial intelligence adoption: Research themes and future directions. Information Technology and Management, 27, 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-024-00435-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kondo, T. S., & Diwani, S. A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in Africa: A bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 2022. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-023-00084-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lopes, L., Chien, J., Wallace, M., & Totolo, E. (2021). The next wave of suptech innovation: Suptech solutions for market conduct supervision. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/79d2a5dc-c88b-58ee-834e-a175f7b165b6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Marak, N. R., & Ayyagari, L. R. (2025). Artificial intelligence for financial inclusion and sustainable development: A systematic literature review. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5, Article 390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00668-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Martino, E. D., Nabilou, H., & Pacces, A. M. (2023). Comparative financial regulation: The analytical framework (ECGI Law Working Paper No. 726/2023). European Corporate Governance Institute. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4522348 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024a). Explanatory memorandum on the updated OECD definition of an AI system (OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers No. 8). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/623da898-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024b). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (OECD/LEGAL/0449). https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Papagiannidis, E., Mikalef, P., & Conboy, K. (2025). Responsible artificial intelligence governance: A review and research framework. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 34(2), Article 101885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2024.101885 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Prenio, J. (2024). Peering through the hype—Assessing suptech tools’ transition from experimentation to supervision (FSI Insights No. 58). Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights58.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Prenio, J., Pustelnikov, A., & Yeo, J. (2024). Building a more diverse suptech ecosystem: Findings from surveys of financial authorities and suptech vendors (FSI Briefs No. 23). Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/fsi/fsibriefs23.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Reis, J. F., & Pinheiro Junior, L. P. (2025). Institutional Theory and Diffusion of Innovation: A theoretical approach to artificial intelligence. BAR–Brazilian Administration Review, 22(4), Article e250060. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2025250060 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. World Bank. (2025). Artificial intelligence for financial sector supervision: An emerging market and developing economies perspective. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099110525115015626 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]