Artificial Intelligence as an Enabler of Transformative Social Entrepreneurship – A Hypothetical Assessment of Its Role in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals

Social entrepreneurship is becoming a vital means of responding to complex problems related to both socio-economic and environmental conditions globally. Despite the potential for social entrepreneurship to transform society and achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), social enterprises experience numerous barriers to scale-up, resource mobilization, impact measurement and operational efficiencies. The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers social enterprises potential solutions to enhance decision making; optimize resource allocation; strengthen their ability to innovate and deliver measurable social impacts.
Therefore, the purpose of the current study is to investigate whether social entrepreneurs' awareness of AI capabilities influences their ability to develop transformative social entrepreneurship that achieves SDGs. The research study uses a mixed-methods design and collects primary data from registered social enterprises. A quantitative survey instrument will be used to collect data from social entrepreneurs. Quantitative data analysis will be conducted via a factor analysis and structural equation model. Qualitative data collection methods, specifically interviews with social enterprises utilizing AI technology, will be used to gather deeper insight into transformative processes. It is expected that the ability of AI to increase the agility and innovation capacity of organizations, along with measured SDG outcomes, will be significantly enhanced. However, there are anticipated financial constraints, digital skills deficits and concerns about ethics of data usage that could impede the adoption of AI technology.
Findings from the research study should be useful for policymakers, social enterprise leaders and development agencies seeking ways to leverage AI technology as a catalyst for sustainable transformation.

Artificial Intelligence, Social Entrepreneurship, Transformative Innovation, Sustainable Development Goals, Organizational Agility, Social Impact.

1. Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). Machine, platform, crowd: Harnessing our digital future. W. W. Norton & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chatterjee, S., Rana, N. P., Tamilmani, K., & Sharma, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence in social enterprises: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Business Research, 116, 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. European Commission. (2020). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Heeks, R. (2017). Information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Routledge Handbook of Development Studies, 284–298. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315681979-25 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kolk, A., Rivera-Santos, M., & Rufin, C. (2014). Reviewing a decade of research on the “base/bottom of the pyramid” (BoP) concept. Business & Society, 53(3), 338–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650312474928 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Lehner, O. M., & Nicholls, A. (2014). Social finance and crowdfunding for social enterprises: A critical review. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2014.885568 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015). Service innovation: A service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.07 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mikalef, P., Pappas, I. O., Krogstie, J., & Giannakos, M. (2018). Big data analytics capabilities: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 16, 547–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-016-0339-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. NITI Aayog. (2018). National strategy for artificial intelligence: #AIForAll. Government of India. https://niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2019-01/NationalStrategy-for-AI-Discussion-Paper.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ratten, V. (2017). Social innovation and entrepreneurship: Developments, opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 18(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465750317695661 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Sachs, J. D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., & Woelm, F. (2021). Sustainable development report 2021: The decade of action for the Sustainable Development Goals. Cambridge University Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Crown Business. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Shabbir, J., & Anwer, F. (2015). Artificial intelligence and its role in the near future. Journal of Latex Class Files, 14(8), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2694702 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. World Economic Forum. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the public good: Maximizing AI’s benefits for society. https://www.weforum.org/reports/artificial-intelligence-for-the-public-good. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building social business models: Lessons from the Grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 308–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]