Assessing the Efficacy of Transparent Risk Communication Against Authoritative Directives During Scientific Emergencies

Background: When a scientific emergency strikes-whether an infectious-disease outbre ak or an environmental hazard institutions face a recurring dilemma: should they lead w ith open, uncertainty-tolerant disclosure, or with firmdirectives that demand immediate o bedience?
Objective: This article reviews the available evidence to weigh the relative effe ctiveness of transparent risk communication against authoritative, directive-based com munication in shaping public trust, compliance, and resistance to misinformation during scientific emergencies.
Methodology: A narrative review approach was used, drawing on peer-reviewed empirical studies, WHO and CDC risk-communication guidance, and policy evaluations published from 2019 to 2026 and gathered through major academic databa ses, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect.
Key findings: The evidence gathered suggests that transparency particularly when it acknow ledges uncertainty and builds people's confidence in their own ability to act cultivates tr ust and voluntary cooperation that last, whereas directives on their own win quicker but more fragile obedience that tends to unravel once contradictions appear. The response st rategies that worked best, especially across Sub-Saharan Africa and Nigeria, blended the two: firm direction for urgent protective steps, reinforced by transparent, community-anc hored explanation that kept trust intact.
Conclusion: On their own, neither strategy is ade quate; the strongest results come from a hybrid, context-sensitive model that opens with authoritative clarity and sustains it with ongoing transparency.
Practical implications: Ri sk communicators, science educators, and policymakers across Taraba State and comp arable settings should build hybrid communication protocols into standard practice, culti vate trusted community messengers, and strengthen the science-communication skills of teachers and health workers who deliver risk messages locally.

risk communication; transparent communication; authoritative directives; sci entific emergencies; public trust;

1. Achenbach, M., & Hua, J. (2024). Beyond misinformation: Developing a public health prevention framework for managing information ecosystems. The Lancet Public Health, 9(5), e332-e340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00031-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adebayo, F. O., Balogun, F. M., & Salawu, M. M. (2022). Handling distrust on risk communication in Nigeria: A strategy to strengthening the COVID-19 outbreak response. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 16(6), 2277-2279. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2021.220 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adebimpe, W. O. (2015). Community perspectives and risk communication during the Ebola virus disease outbreak in Rivers State, Nigeria. Global Health Communication, 1(1), 15-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Adebisi, Y. A., Rabe, A., & Lucero-Prisno III, D. E. (2021). Risk communication and community engagement strategies for COVID-19 in 13 African countries. Health Promotion Perspectives, 11(2), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.2021.18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ahn, C., & Noh, G. Y. (2021). Testing extended parallel processing model in the Korean COVID-19 context: Effect of moral intuitions as moderators. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, Article 756281. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.756281 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Calleja, N., AbdAllah, A., Abad, N., Ahmed, N., Albarracin, D., Altieri, E., Anoko, J. N., Arcos, R., Azlan, A. A., Bayer, J., Bechmann, A., Bezbaruah, S., Briand, S. C., Brooks, I., Bucci, L. M., Burzo, S., Czerniak, C., De Domenico, M., Dunn, A. G., ... Purnat, T. D. (2021). A public health research agenda for managing infodemics: Methods and results of the first WHO infodemiology conference. JMIR Infodemiology, 1(1), e30979. https://doi.org/10.2196/30979 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). Crisis and emergency risk communication (CERC) manual. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fahim, C., Cooper, J., Theivendrampillai, S., Pham, B., & Straus, S. (2023). Ontarians' perceptions of public health communications and misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e38323. https://doi.org/10.2196/38323 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hodson, J., Reid, D., Veletsianos, G., Houlden, S., & Thompson, C. (2023). Heuristic responses to pandemic uncertainty: Practicable communication strategies of "reasoned transparency" to aid public reception of changing science. Public Understanding of Science, 32(4), 428-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221135425 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hu, G., Chen, Z., Wang, J., & Huang, S. (2023). Editorial: Risk communication and community engagement during public health emergencies. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, Article 1164973. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1164973 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ilesanmi, O. S., Afolabi, A. A., & Uchendu, O. (2021). The prospective COVID-19 vaccine: Willingness to pay and perception of community members in Ibadan, Nigeria. PeerJ, 9, e11153. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11153 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Jegede, A. S. (2007). What led to the Nigerian boycott of the polio vaccination campaign? PLoS Medicine, 4(3), e73. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040073 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. (2025). Checklist to build trust, improve public health communication, and anticipate rumors during public health emergencies. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lalot, F., Heering, M. S., Rullo, M., Travaglino, G. A., & Abrams, D. (2020). The dangers of distrustful complacency: Low concern and low political trust combine to undermine compliance with governmental restrictions in the emerging COVID-19 pandemic. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220967986 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lowe, A. E., Voo, T. C., Lee, L. M., Dineen Gillespie, K. K., Feig, C., Ferdinand, A. O., Mohapatra, S., Brett-Major, D. M., & Wynia, M. K. (2022). Uncertainty, scarcity and transparency: Public health ethics and risk communication in a pandemic. The Lancet Regional Health - Americas, 16, Article 100374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2022.100374 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nagar, A., Huhn, N., & Sell, T. K. (2023). Summary report for task 8: Identify and analyze health-related rumors related to past public health emergencies. Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nigeria Centre for Disease Control. (2022). Risk communication and community engagement (RCCE) pillar: Implementation report, 2021-2022. Nigeria Centre for Disease Control. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. O'Malley, P., Rainford, J., & Thompson, A. (2009). Transparency during public health emergencies: From rhetoric to reality. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87(8), 614-618. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.08.056689 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ophir, Y., Walter, D., & Marchak, E. (2020). A collaborative way of knowing: Bridging agnotology and the study of ignorance to better understand the role of confusion and inaccurate beliefs in misinformation. Communication Theory, 30(4), 351-369. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Reuben, R. C., & Danladi, M. M. A. (2022). Risk communication during health emergencies in Nigeria: What are its challenges? Pan African Medical Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Rimal, R. N., & Lapinski, M. K. (2009). Why health communication is important in public health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87(4), 247. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.08.056713 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Vinck, P., Pham, P. N., Bindu, K. K., Bedford, J., & Nilles, E. J. (2019). Institutional trust and misinformation in the response to the 2018-19 Ebola outbreak in North Kivu, DR Congo: A population-based survey. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 19(5), 529-536. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. World Health Organization. (2025). Infodemic management scoping review: WHO/EMRO synthesis. World Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Yoon, H., You, M., & Shon, C. (2022). Self-efficacy and risk communication messaging: Predictors of protective health behaviour during COVID-19 in South Korea. Health Communication, 37(9), 1123-1131. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]