00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Determinants of Statistical Literacy among College Students at Wesleyan University-Philippines

Authors

Caleb John L. Senados

Wesleyan University – Philippines (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150800068

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 15/8 | Page No: 949-959

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-28

Accepted: 2026-09-02

Published: 2026-09-12

Abstract

This study examined the determinants of perceived statistical literacy among college students at Wesleyan University-Philippines. A quantitative descriptive-correlational and predictive research design was employed, involving 125 college students selected through stratified random sampling. Data were collected using a validated and reliability-tested structured questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics, Spearman’s rank-order correlation, independent-samples t-test, analysis of variance, Tukey HSD post hoc test, and multiple linear regression. The respondents generally perceived themselves as having adequate prior mathematical knowledge and agreed that they possessed favorable attitudes, statistical self-efficacy, access to learning technology, positive faculty teaching practices, and statistical literacy. However, they also reported experiencing statistics anxiety. Age was not significantly associated with the study variables. Significant differences according to sex were found in prior mathematical knowledge, attitude toward statistics, statistics anxiety, and technology use. College program was associated with attitude toward statistics, statistical self-efficacy, statistics anxiety, and technology use. Nevertheless, perceived statistical literacy did not significantly differ according to sex or college program. Multiple regression analysis revealed that attitude toward statistics and perceived faculty teaching practices significantly predicted perceived statistical literacy, with faculty teaching practices emerging as the strongest predictor. The findings highlight the importance of effective instruction and positive attitudes in developing students’ ability to understand, interpret, and evaluate statistical information.

Keywords

attitude toward statistics, college students, faculty teaching practices, statistical literacy, statistics education

Downloads

References

1. Bond, M. B.-R. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bornstein, M. H. (2017). Sampling in developmental science: Situations, shortcomings, solutions, and standards. Developmental Review, 33(4), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Engel, J. (2017). Statistical literacy for active citizenship: A call for data science education. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v16i1.213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Engel, J. (2017). Statistical literacy for active citizenship: A call for data science education. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v16i1.213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Funder, D. C. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. . https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gal, I. (2019). Understanding statistical literacy: About knowledge of contexts and models. Statistics Education Research Journal, 18(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v18i1.265. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gould, R. (2017). Data literacy is statistical literacy. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(1), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v16i1.209. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kurnia, A. B. (2024). The development of high school students’ statistical literacy across grade level. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 36(Suppl. 1), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-023-00449-x. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Luttenberger, S. W. (2018). Spotlight on math anxiety. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 11, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S141421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Macher, D. P. (2015). Statistics anxiety, trait anxiety, learning behavior, and academic performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27, 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0090-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nielsen, T. &. (2018). Measuring statistical anxiety and attitudes toward statistics: The development of a comprehensive Danish instrument. Cogent Education, 5(1), Article 1521574. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1521574. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Phadke, S. B. (2024). Examining the role of context in statistical literacy outcomes using an isomorphic assessment instrument. Statistics Education Research Journal, 23(1) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. . https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v23i1.529. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ridgway, J. (2016). . Implications of the data revolution for statistics education. International Statistical Review, 84(3), 528–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Sharma, S. (2017). Definitions and models of statistical literacy: A literature review. Open Review of Educational Research, 4(1), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2017.1354313. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Sharma, S. (2017). Definitions and models of statistical literacy: A literature review. Open Review of Educational Research, 4(1), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2017.1354313. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Suhermi, S. &. (2020). What are the roles of technology in improving student statistical literacy? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1581, Article 012067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1581/1/012067. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Theobald, E. J. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6476–6483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.