Effect of Audit Committee Financial Expertise and Diligence on Related Party Transactions of Listed Financial Services in Nigeria

This study examined the effect of audit committee financial expertise and diligence on related party transaction (RPT) disclosure among listed financial service firms in Nigeria. An ex-post facto research design was adopted using secondary data obtained from the annual reports of all 45 financial service companies listed on the Nigerian Exchange (NGX) as at 31 December 2024. A census sampling technique was employed, while logistic regression was used to analyze the data. The findings revealed that audit committee financial expertise has a positive and statistically significant effect on RPT disclosure (OR = 0.3425, p = 0.001), indicating that financially competent audit committees enhance transparency and strengthen financial reporting. Conversely, audit committee diligence exhibited a positive but statistically insignificant effect on RPT disclosure (OR = 0.0122, p = 0.564), suggesting that meeting frequency alone does not improve disclosure quality. Among the control variables, leverage had a significant positive effect on RPT disclosure (p = 0.030), whereas firm size showed no significant influence (p = 0.781). The study concludes that audit committee financial expertise is a key determinant of transparent related party transaction disclosure. It recommends strengthening financial expertise requirements for audit committee members, improving the quality of committee oversight, and enhancing regulatory monitoring of highly leveraged firms to promote corporate transparency and accountability.

Audit committee, financial expertise, diligence, related party transactions, corporate governance, Nigeria.

1. Abigail, A., & Dharmastuti, C. (2022). The impact of related party transactions on firm value in Indonesia: Moderating role of good corporate governance. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2135208 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agyei-Mensah, B. K. (2019). The effect of audit committee attributes on compliance with IAS 24 related party disclosure: An empirical study. International Journal of Law and Management, 61(1), 266–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-03-2018-0056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alhumoudi, H. (2024). The impact of audit committee characteristics on financial reporting quality: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 9(5), e04935. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2024.v9i5.4935 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alkebsee, R., Alhebry, A. A., Tiron-Tudor, A., Gubara, G. F., & Alsayegh, A. (2024). Audit committee cash compensation and related-party transactions: The role of directors’ affiliation. Managerial [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Auditing Journal, 39(5), 522–544. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ- 06-2023-3936 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Almaqtari, F. A., Farhan, N. H., Al-Hattami, H. M., & Elsheikh, T. (2022). The moderating role of board independence in the relationship between board characteristics, related party transactions, and financial performance. PLOS ONE, 17(12), e0279159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279159 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Al-Shaer, H., Malik, M. F., & Zaman, M. (2022). What do audit committees do? Transparency and impression management. Journal of Management and Governance, 26(4), 1443–1468. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09598-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Al-Shaer, H., Salama, A., & Toms, S. (2017). Audit committees and financial reporting quality: Evidence from UK environmental accounting disclosures. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 18(1), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-10-2014-0114 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Altawalbeh, M. A. F. (2020). Audit committee attributes, corporate governance, and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Jordan. Management, 10(2), 233–243. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ashrafi, M., Abbasi, E., Hosseini, S. A., & Poor Etemadi, M. (2020). The effect of related party transactions on firm value: The moderating role of the audit committee. Iranian Journal of Finance, 3(2), 25–43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bart, C., & McQueen, G. (2013). Why women make better directors. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 8(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2013.052743 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Bertoni, F., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2014). Board independence, ownership structure, and the valuation of IPOs in continental Europe. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(2), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Brick, I. E., & Chidambaran, N. K. (2010). Board meetings, committee structure, and firm value. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(4), 533–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.06.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Beerbaum, D., & Piechocki, M. (2017). Related party transactions: Empirical study based on IFRS and SEC disclosures. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3060624 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Cagle, M. (2021). Compliance with IAS 24 related party disclosures and audit committee efficiency: Evidence from manufacturing firms listed on the BIST. Journal of Accounting and Taxation Studies, 14(2), 479–510. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. El-Helaly, M. (2018). Related-party transactions: A review of the regulation, governance and auditing literature. Managerial Auditing Journal, 33(8/9), 779–806. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-11-2017-1702 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Elsayed, K. (2011). Board size and corporate performance: The missing role of board leadership structure. Journal of Management & Governance, 15(3), 415–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-009-9110-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ernawati, D., & Aryani, Y. A. (2019). Controlling shareholders, audit committee characteristics, and related party transaction disclosure: Evidence from Indonesia. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 23(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v23i1.2035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ernawati, N., & Aryani, M. D. (2019). Controlling shareholders, audit committee characteristics, and related party transaction disclosure: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 9(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v9i1.14590 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Fooladi, M., & Farhadi, M. (2019). Corporate governance and detrimental related party transactions: Evidence from Malaysia. Asian Review of Accounting, 27(2), 196–227.https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-02-2018-0029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ghazalia, A. W., & Shafie, N. A. (2019). The relationship between audit committee, political influence and financial reporting quality: Malaysian evidence. Management & Accounting Review, 18(2), 193–244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Habib, A., Bhuiyan, M. B. U., & Wu, J. Y. (2021). Audit committee ownership and the cost of equity capital. Managerial Auditing Journal, 36(5), 665–698. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-09-2019-2419 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Hashmi, M. A., Abdullah, Brahmana, R. K., Ansari, T., & Hasan, M. A. (2022). Do effective audit committees, gender-diverse boards, and corruption controls influence the voluntary disclosures of Asian banks? The moderating role of directors' experience. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), Article 2135205. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2135205 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Homroy, S., & Slechten, A. (2019). Do board expertise and networked boards affect environmental performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 158(1), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3744-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Kao, L., & Chen, A. (2020). How a pre-IPO audit committee improves IPO pricing efficiency in an economy with little value uncertainty and information asymmetry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 110, Article 105688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.105688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Luo, J. H., Li, X., & Chen, H. (2018). Annual report readability and corporate agency costs. China Journal of Accounting Research, 11(3), 187–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2018.04.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mamman, S., & Usman, M. M. (2022). Corporate governance characteristics and financial reporting disclosures of listed industrial goods firms in Nigeria. European Modern Studies Journal, 7(3), 303–314. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Manap, M. I. A., Ya'acob, N. S., & Alrazi, B. (2022). Audit committee competencies and corporate disclosure transparency of Malaysian government-linked companies. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 10(2–3), 345–362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPSPM.2022.123947 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Meng, X., & Tian, J. J. (2020). Board expertise and executive incentives. Management Science, 66(11), 5448–5464. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3402 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Mnif Sellami, Y., & Borgi Fendri, H. (2017). The effect of audit committee characteristics on compliance with IFRS for related party disclosures: Evidence from South Africa. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(6), 603–626. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-06-2016- 1395 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Muniandy, B., & Hillier, J. (2015). Board independence, investment opportunity set and performance of South African firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 35, 108–124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2015.09.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Nekhili, M., Bennouri, M., & Nagati, H. (2022). Do board gender quotas benefit minority shareholders? An illustration through related-party transactions. British Journal of Management, 33(2), 724–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12504 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Obeng, V. A., Ahmed, K., & Cahan, S. F. (2021). Integrated reporting and agency costs: International evidence from voluntary adopters. European Accounting Review, 30(4), 645–674. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2020.1813608 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Opanyi, R. O. (2019). Corporate voluntary disclosure and the value of the firm: A critical literature review. International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research, 4(9), 5922–5957. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Rafay, A. (2022). Related party disclosures in financial reporting for Islamic banks. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 13(7), 997–1017. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-01-2021-0025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Rahmat, M. M., Nordin, N., & Adznan, S. (2019). Audit committee financial expertise and RPT-conflict disclosure: Insight evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 15(4), 355–377. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAAPE.2019.103427 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Ratnawati, V., Abdul-Hamid, M. A., & Popoola, O. M. J. (2016). The influence of agency conflict types I and II on earnings management. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(4), 126–132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Renaldo, N., Musa, S., & Wahid, N. (2023). Capital structure, profitability, and block-holder ownership on dividend policy using free cash flow as a moderating variable. Journal of Applied Business and Technology, 4(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.35145/jabt.v4i2.127 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Rossi, F., & Harjoto, M. A. (2020). Corporate non-financial disclosure, firm value, risk, and agency costs: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Review of Managerial Science, 14(5), 1149–1181. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00358-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Salehi, M., & Shirazi, M. (2016). Audit committee impact on the quality of financial reporting and disclosure: Evidence from the Tehran Stock Exchange. Management Research Review, 39(12), 1639–1662. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2015-0221 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Schwartz-Ziv, M., & Weisbach, M. S. (2013). What do boards really do? Evidence from minutes of board meetings. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(2), 349–366. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.04.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Simpson, A., & Tamayo, A. (2020). Real effects of financial reporting and disclosure on innovation. Accounting and Business Research, 50(5), 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2019.1649469 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Sridhar, I., & Jasrotia, S. S. (2020). Related party transactions and corporate governance: Evidence from India. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 20(2), 234–244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICBM.2020.105812 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Terjesen, S., Couto, E. B., & Francisco, P. M. (2016). Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity. Journal of Management & Governance, 20(3), 447–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-014-9307-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Thomsen, S., Pedersen, T., & Kvist, H. K. (2006). Blockholder ownership: Effects on firm value in market- and control-based governance systems. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(2), 246–269. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.03.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Study to Assess the Impact of a Nurse-Led Educational Intervention on Knowledge Regarding Oral Health Among Primigravida in Selected Hospitals of Navi Mumbai
• Attitude towards Mathematics and Science in Relation to STEM Career Aspirations among Senior Secondary School Students
• AI-Driven Personalized Learning in Educational Systems: A Framework for Adaptive Learning and Decision Support
• Institutionalizing Indigenous Peoples Education in Philippine Basic Education: Development of the Integrated Institutionalization Framework for Indigenous Peoples Education (IIF-IPEd)
• Toward an Integrated Theory of Enterprise Risk Management: A Multi-Theoretical Conceptual Framework