Financial Constraints and Risk-Sharing Practices in Building Project Delivery: Evidence from Bauchi State, Nigeria

Financial constraints and risk-sharing arrangements are closely embedded in construction project delivery, yet state-level evidence from conventional building projects in Nigeria remains limited. This study examined the major financial constraints experienced by building-project stakeholders and assessed prevailing risk-sharing practices in Bauchi State, Nigeria. A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted within an accessible population of 200 construction practitioners. Of 132 questionnaires administered purposively to eligible respondents, 84 usable responses were analysed, representing a usable response rate of 63.6%. Twenty-one financial-constraint indicators were measured on a five-point agreement scale and fourteen risk-sharing practices on a five-point frequency scale. Descriptive statistics, Relative Importance Index (RII) and Cronbach's alpha were applied. The financial-constraint and risk-sharing measures demonstrated good internal consistency (α = 0.845 and 0.905, respectively). Commercial-bank interest rates emerged as the leading financial constraint (M = 4.43; RII = 0.89), followed by political and policy uncertainty (M = 4.38; RII = 0.88), while delayed client payments and bureaucratic disbursement bottlenecks were also highly rated. Contractual flexibility ranked first among risk-sharing practices (M = 3.91; RII = 0.78), followed by stakeholder trust and commitment, financial risk-sharing mechanisms and collaborative decision-making. Conversely, transparency of risk clauses and formal contractual allocation ranked comparatively lower. The findings indicate that building-project delivery in Bauchi State combines substantial financial pressure with strong reliance on adaptive and relational risk-governance practices. The results are exploratory and context-specific because the purposive, single-state design does not support population-wide statistical generalisation.

Bauchi State; building projects; construction finance; financial constraints; risk allocation; risk sharing

1. Arijeloye, B. T. (2025). Impact of project risk allocation on PPP housing project delivery in Nigeria: Partial least square structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 23(3), 812-829. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-07-2023-0304 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Arijeloye, B. T., Ramabodu, M. S., & Chikafalimani, S. H. P. (2025). Application of fuzzy risk allocation decision model for improving the Nigerian public-private partnership mass housing project procurement. Buildings, 15(16), 2866. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15162866 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Assaf, M., Hussein, M., & Alsulami, B. T. (2022). A mixed review of cash flow modeling: Potential of blockchain for modular construction. Buildings, 12(12), 2054. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12122054 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Atakul, N. (2022). Exploring the cash flow management strategies of Turkish construction companies. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation, 5(3), 168-180. https://doi.org/10.31462/jcemi.2022.03168180 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chadee, A. A., Ali, H., & Gallage, S. (2023). Modelling the implications of delayed payments on contractors' cashflows on infrastructure projects. Civil Engineering Journal, 9(1), 52-71. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-01-05 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ebekozien, A., Aigbavboa, C., & Thwala, W. D. (2024). Sustainable development goals under threat: The impact of inflation on construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(13), 323-341. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2024-0357 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Elhag, T., Eapen, S., & Ballal, T. (2020). Moderating claims and disputes through collaborative procurement. Construction Innovation, 20(1), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-02-2019-0020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Federation Internationale des Ingenieurs-Conseils. (2019). FIDIC golden principles (1st ed.). FIDIC. https://fidic.org/books/fidic-golden-principles-2019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Finnie, D. H., Masood, R., & Grant, L. (2024). Subcontractor engagement in the two-stage early contractor involvement paradigm for commercial construction. Knowledge, 4(2), 302-320. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge4020017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ihedigbo, K. S., Mgbeahuru, C. O., & Wuna, M. A. (2024). Assessment of the relationship between cost of building materials and property development in Abia State, Nigeria. Journal of Sustainability and Environmental Management, 3(2), 102-110. https://doi.org/10.3126/josem.v3i2.71918 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jagtap, M., & Kamble, S. (2019). An empirical assessment of relational contracting model for supply chain of construction projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(7), 1537-1560. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-05-2018-0097 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kortenko, S., Koskela, L., & Tzortzopoulos, P. (2021). Can Last Planner System help to overcome the negative effects of design-bid-build? Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. https://doi.org/10.24928/2021/0184 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Li, H., Arditi, D., & Wang, Z. (2015). Determinants of transaction costs in construction projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 21(5), 548-558. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.897973 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Malekshah, M. E. E., Mehdiabadi, A., & Pourmansouri, R. (2022). Risk allocation optimization between owner and contractor in construction projects by using the UTA-STAR method. Applied Sciences, 12(17), 8402. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178402 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mohammed, S. M., & Muhammad, I. (2024). Assessment of systematic risk management practices on building construction projects in Nigeria. Journal of Contemporary Research in the Built Environment, 8(1), 15-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Nwafor, I. V., Ugonabo, C. U., & Christian, O. N. (2023). Effects of macroeconomic indicators on cost of building materials in Nigeria. African Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 6(4), 166-176. https://doi.org/10.52589/ajsshr-jbfcf7bd [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Oke, A. E., Adetoro, P. E., Stephen, S. S., Aigbavboa, C. O., Oyewobi, L. O., & Aghimien, D. O. (2023). Risk management practices in Nigeria. In Risk management practices in construction: A global view (pp. 21-32). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35557-8_3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Oladimeji, O. (2022). Evaluation of price distribution of building elements in the bills of quantities of locally owned construction firms in South West Nigeria. LAUTECH Journal of Civil and Environmental Studies, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.36108/laujoces/2202.80.0220 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Omopariola, E. D., Windapo, A. O., Edwards, D. J., Aigbavboa, C. O., Yakubu, S. U.-N., & Obari, O. (2023). Modelling the domino effect of advance payment system on project cash flow and organisational performance. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2023-0254 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Omopariola, E. D., Windapo, A., & Edwards, D. J. (2021). Attributes and impact of advance payment system on cash flow, project and organisational performance. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 27(3), 306-322. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMPC-03-2021-0022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Omopariola, E. D., Windapo, A., Edwards, D. J., & Thwala, W. D. (2020). Contractors' perceptions of the effects of cash flow on construction projects. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 18(2), 308-325. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-04-2019-0099 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Osuizugbo, I. C. (2020). Financial instruments used in the financing construction project in Nigeria. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, 18(3), 24-35. https://doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2020/v18i317210 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Oyeyipo, O. O., & Osuizugbo, I. C. (2023). Factors influencing enterprise risk management implementation of construction firms in Lagos State, Nigeria. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1164 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Palihakkara, A. D., & Perera, B. A. K. S. (2022). Risk management in guaranteed maximum price contracts. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 11(2), 368-386. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-09-2021-0176 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Perera, B. A. K. S., & Dewagoda, K. G. (2021). Streamlining the management of payment delays: The case of Sri Lankan Government building construction projects. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 26(2), 236-256. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMPC-05-2020-0041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sheamar, S., Wedawatta, G., & Tennakoon, M. (2023). The potential of new models of construction procurement to counter cost overruns in construction projects: An exploratory study from a contractors' perspective. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 29(2), 211-228. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMPC-08-2022-0035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Smith, A. D., & Wood, G. (2019). Target cost contracts and the development of collaborative behaviours and value for money in the UK construction industry. Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, 4(4), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.18775/jibrm.1849-8558.2015.44.3001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233-261. https://doi.org/10.1086/466942 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. World Bank. (n.d.). Allocating risks. Public-Private Partnership Resource Center. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://ppp.worldbank.org/allocating-risks [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Yin, Y., Lin, Q., & Xiao, W. (2020). Impacts of risk allocation on contractors' opportunistic behavior: The moderating effect of trust and control. Sustainability, 12(22), 9604. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229604 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Zainudin, N. A., Adnan, H., & Baharuddin, H. E. A. (2022). A comparative study on risk allocation for different procurement type in Malaysian industry. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1067(1), 012066. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1067/1/012066 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]