Impact of Petroleum Subsidy Removal on Health Care Sector in Nasarawa State Nigeria.

The study examined the impact of petroleum subsidy removal on the healthcare sector in Nasarawa State, Nigeria. The broad objective of the study is to investigate the impact of petroleum subsidy removal on public health care delivery in Nasarawa State Nigeria. The study adopted a survey research design, both primary and secondary data were used for the study. The population of 2,520 was used from which the sample size of 345 was determined using Taro Yamane formular. Logistic multiple regression analysis (logit regression model) was employed to examine the relationship between the dependent and independent variables. The result revealed that increased fuel prices have led to higher transportation costs, reduced access to medical services especially in rural areas and a rise in operational expenses for hospitals and clinics. The study also revealed that the positive and significant outcome for patients’ accessibility (p = 0.0026) suggests that as transportation fares rise, patients find it increasingly difficult to visit healthcare facility. Therefore, the study recommended that the federal and state governments introduce targeted subsidies or grants specifically for the health sector to ensure a continuous supply of essential drugs, medical consumables, and equipment in public hospitals despite the rising cost of energy and logistics. It also recommended that the government, in collaboration with local transport unions, implement subsidized transport schemes or mobile health outreach programs in rural and semi-urban areas to improve patient access to health facilities. The study concludes that while subsidy removal may promote long-term fiscal sustainability, its short-term adverse effects on the healthcare sector are significant.

Health Care Delivery, Patients’ Accessibility, Low-income Household Accessibility, Health Workers Response, Availability of Essential Medical Services.

1. Adebayo, A. (2020). The effect of fuel subsidy removal on health sector financing in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Economics and Development Studies, 42(2), 156-178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adebayo, R. T., & Musa, Y. A. (2021). Public health financing and the burden of primary health care delivery in Northen Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Health Policy and Management, 6(2), 45-57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Akinwande, O. O., & Olaniyan, O. (2021). Fuel subsidy removal and access to health services in Nigeria: Implications for the poor. Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies, 63(2), 115-134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alabi, J. (2021). The economic effects of fuel subsidy removal on healthcare services in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Sciences, 33(4), 48-61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bello, I. A., & Ibrahim, L. M. (2023). Fiscal decentralization and public health infrastructure in Nasarawa State. Journal of Nigeria Development Studies, 15(1), 112-128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. BudgIT. (2020). Nigeria’s fuel subsidy regime: Dilemma of the world’s most populous Black nation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. BudgIT. (2022). Analysis of the 2022 budget: sectoral allocations and implications for service delivery. BudgIT Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Coady, D., Parry, I., Le, N.-P., & Shang, B. (2017). How large are global fossil fuel subsidies? World Development, 91, 11-27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. IMF. (2020). Nigeria: 2020 Article IV Consultation press release; Staff report; and Statement by the Executive Director [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Iwayemi, A., & Adenikinju, A. (2018). Energy pricing and public policy in Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 20(3), 45-61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2021). 2020 poverty and inequality in Nigeria: Executive Summary. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. NEITI. (2022). The cost of fuel subsidy: A tale of losses and inefficiencies. Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Okonkwo, C. J., & Suleiman, M. T. (2021). Energy insecurity and health facility performance in rural Nigeria. Journal of Development policy and practice, 7(3), 55-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Olayemi, A. O., & Bello, M. A. (2021). The socio-economic consequences of fuel subsidy removal in Nigeria: A public health perspective. Journal of Social Policy and Health Promotion, 9(2), 89-104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Onwujekwe, O., Obi, F., Ichoku, H., & Uzochukwu, B. (2019). Financing and benefit incidence of health services in Nigeria: A public goods perspective. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sani, Y. (2020). Petroleum subsidy removal and public healthcare delivery in Nigeria. Journal of Public Health Research and Policy, 18(4), 210-224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. World Bank. (2021). Nigeria Public expenditure review: Strengthening fiscal resilience and service delivery. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. World Bank. (2022). Nigeria Development Update: the urgency for business unusual. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. World Health Organization. (2020). Occupational safety and health in public health emergencies: A manual for protecting health workers and responders. Geneva: WHO Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]