Microclimate and User Perception in Vegetated and Non-Vegetated Educational Courtyards: A Paired Field Study in Visakhapatnam, India | IJLTEMAS
00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Microclimate and User Perception in Vegetated and Non-Vegetated Educational Courtyards: A Paired Field Study in Visakhapatnam, India

Authors

K Sai Sri Laasya

M.Arch (Sustainable Architecture) Student, School of Architecture, GITAM, Visakhapatnam, India (India)

Sai Gautham Kumar Gujjula

Assistant Professor, School of Architecture, GITAM, Visakhapatnam, India (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.151000029

Subject Category: Sustainability

Volume/Issue: 15/10 | Page No: 351-361

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-10-14

Accepted: 2026-10-19

Published: 2026-10-31

Abstract

Courtyards can moderate heat in dense educational settings, yet field evidence from warm-humid Indian campuses remains limited and is rarely integrated with user perception. This study compared a vegetated courtyard (GSB) and a non-vegetated courtyard (SACB) in Visakhapatnam through repeated air-temperature and relative-humidity measurements and an aggregate post-occupancy survey. Four spatial points were monitored at 09:00 am and 12:00 pm on ten dates between 23 July and 8 August 2026. Point readings were averaged for each courtyard-session and paired by date and time to avoid pseudo-replication. GSB was cooler on every date, with mean differences of -0.72°C at 09:00 am (95% CI -1.03 to -0.41; p=0.0005) and -1.20°C at 12:00 pm (95% CI -1.76 to -0.65; p=0.0009). Relative humidity was higher at GSB by 3.52 and 3.39 percentage points, respectively. Positive ratings for comfort during stays of at least 30 minutes and suitability for activities were both 90.9% at GSB and 20.0% at SACB. Physical and perceptual evidence therefore converged on a cooler, more usable microclimate at GSB. However, the observational design cannot separate vegetation from geometry, materials, shade and airflow. The study offers a transparent paired-analysis framework for small campus microclimate datasets and identifies priorities for stronger causal and thermal-comfort assessment.

Keywords

Courtyard microclimate, Outdoor thermal comfort, Post-occupancy evaluation, Warm-humid climate

Downloads

References

1. Abdallah, A. S. H. (2022). Passive design strategies to improve student thermal comfort in Assiut University: A field study in the Faculty of Physical Education in hot season. Sustainable Cities and Society, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104110 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Hafith, O., Satish, B. K., Bradbury, S., & De Wilde, P. (2017). The Impact of Courtyard parameters on its shading level An experimental study in Baghdad, Iraq. Energy Procedia, 134, 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.539 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Diz-Mellado, E., Nikolopoulou, M., López-Cabeza, V. P., Rivera-Gómez, C., & Galán-Marín, C. (2023). Cross-evaluation of thermal comfort in semi-outdoor spaces according to geometry in Southern Spain. Urban Climate, 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101491 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Gomaa, M. M., Othman, E., Mohamed, A. F., & Ragab, A. (2024). Quantifying the Impacts of Courtyard Vegetation on Thermal and Energy Performance of University Buildings in Hot Arid Regions. Urban Science, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8030136 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Karimi, A., Bayat, A., Mohammadzadeh, N., Mohajerani, M., & Yeganeh, M. (2023). Microclimatic analysis of outdoor thermal comfort of high-rise buildings with different configurations in Tehran: Insights from field surveys and thermal comfort indices. Building and Environment, 240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110445 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Karimi, A., Sanaieian, H., Farhadi, H., & Norouzian-Maleki, S. (2020). Evaluation of the thermal indices and thermal comfort improvement by different vegetation species and materials in a medium-sized urban park. Energy Reports, 6, 1670–1684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.06.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Li, Z., Chow, D. H. C., Yao, J., Zheng, X., & Zhao, W. (2019). The effectiveness of adding horizontal greening and vertical greening to courtyard areas of existing buildings in the hot summer cold winter region of China: A case study for Ningbo. Energy and Buildings, 196, 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.05.025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Lopez-Cabeza, V. P., Alzate-Gaviria, S., Diz-Mellado, E., Rivera-Gomez, C., & Galan-Marin, C. (2022). Albedo influence on the microclimate and thermal comfort of courtyards under Mediterranean hot summer climate conditions. Sustainable Cities and Society, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103872 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mahmoud, R. M. A., & Abdallah, A. S. H. (2022). Assessment of outdoor shading strategies to improve outdoor thermal comfort in school courtyards in hot and arid climates. Sustainable Cities and Society, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104147 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Marchi, L., Gaspari, J., & Fabbri, K. (2023). Outdoor Microclimate in Courtyard Buildings: Impact of Building Perimeter Configuration and Tree Density. Buildings, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112687 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Melas, E., Thoma, E., & Tsiros, I. (2021). An assessment of microclimatic conditions inside vegetated and non-vegetated small-scale open spaces in the Athens urban environment. Global Nest Journal, 23(3), 414–417. https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.003903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mohammad, P., Aghlmand, S., Fadaei, A., Gachkar, S., Gachkar, D., & Karimi, A. (2021). Evaluating the role of the albedo of material and vegetation scenarios along the urban street canyon for improving pedestrian thermal comfort outdoors. Urban Climate, 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100993 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Peter, A., & Kaushik, S. A. S. (2024). A study on the impact of courtyard vegetation on its thermal comfort performance in an educational building of warm and humid climates. Science, Engineering and Health Studies, 18. https://doi.org/10.69598/sehs.18.24040011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Qin, H., & Zhou, B. (2025). Optimizing Vegetation Configurations for Seasonal Thermal Comfort in Campus Courtyards: An ENVI-Met Study in Hot Summer and Cold Winter Climates. Plants, 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14111670 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Salameh, M., Touqan, B., & Salameh, M. (2020). Courtyard design in schools and its influence on students’ satisfaction. World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering, 197-1-197–12. https://doi.org/10.11159/icgre20.197 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sun, H., Jimenez-Bescos, C., Mohammadi, M., Zhong, F., & Calautit, J. K. (2021). Numerical investigation of the influence of vegetation on the aero-thermal performance of buildings with courtyards in hot climates. Energies, 14(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14175388 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Unal, M., & Middel, A. (2025). Improving thermal comfort in hot-arid Phoenix, Arizona courtyards: Exploring the cooling benefits of ground surface cover and shade. Building and Environment, 278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Zheng, G., Xu, H., Liu, F., & Dong, J. (2024). Impact of Plant Layout on Microclimate of Summer Courtyard Space Based on Orthogonal Experimental Design. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114425 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

Engineering,
Management &
Applied Science
Journal
(IJLTEMAS)
Published by RSIS International
Tower B, Suncity Success Tower
Golf Course Ext Rd, Sector 65
Gurugram, Haryana 122101, India
© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. ISSN 2278-2540.