Performance Evaluation of Sodium Trimetaphosphate (STMP) Modified Gum Arabic as an Agricultural-based Superplasticizer on Fresh and Hardened Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete

This study evaluates the performance of Sodium Trimetaphosphate (STMP) modified Gum Arabic (MGA) as a sustainable bio-admixture for Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC). comparing its fresh, rheological, and mechanical properties against raw Gum Arabic (GA) and a commercial synthetic superplasticizer (SP). Under standardized laboratory procedures, SCC mixes were formulated using Portland Cement (CEM II/A-LL, 42.5) with incremental admixture dosages (0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5% by binder weight) at a constant water-to-binder ratio of 0.40. Fresh properties were evaluated using Abram’s slump flow, V-funnel flow time, and L-box blocking ratio (h2/h1). Rheological yield stress was derived via an indirect slump-flow methodology, Mechanical strength was assessed using displacement-controlled compression and tensile tests at 28 days, supplemented by X-ray Diffraction (XRD) for mineralogical phase analysis. Experimental results established 1.0% concentration as the optimal saturation threshold across all formulations. At this dosage, 1.0% MGA achieved a slump flow spread of 645 mm, which is 3.73% lower than both 1.0% GA (670 mm) and 1.0% SP (670 mm), yet fully satisfying EFNARC (2005) deformability criteria. In viscosity assessments, MGA demonstrated superior discharge efficiency, recording a V-funnel time of (20.32 s) a 63.71% reduction compared to GA (56.00 s) and a 32.27% reduction compared to SP (30.00 s). Passing ability tests yielded an L-box ratio of 0.91 for MGA, which is 1.09% lower than GA (0.92) and 3.19% lower than SP (0.94), well above the 0.80 non-blocking threshold. Rheological modelling revealed that MGA significantly reduced internal shear resistance, achieving a yield stress of 57.94 Pa and 8.44% reduction compared to GA (63.28 Pa) and a 3.16% reduction compared to SP (59.83 Pa). In hardened state testing, 1.0% MGA attained a 28-day compressive strength of (40.67 N/mm2) (Grade C32/40, representing a 0.12% increase over GA (40.62 N/mm2) and a 0.39% increase over SP (40.51N/mm2). MGA also achieved a 28-day split tensile strength of (4.59 N/mm2), XRD patterns confirmed the formation of dense Calcium Silicate Hydrate (C-S-H) gel without adverse phase shifts. STMP modification successfully enhances the anionic charge density of raw GA, establishing MGA as a viable high-performance replacement for synthetic superplasticizers.

Sodium Trimetaphosphate (STMP), Modified Gum Arabic, Agricultural-based Admixture, Rheology and Self-compacting Concrete (SCC).

1. Abhijeet, S. G. (2023) Admixtures in Concrete. A Review Conference Paper, Construction Materials and Management, National Institute of Construction Management and Research (NICMAR) Publication [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. American Standard for Testing Materials (2021). Standard Specification for Concrete and concrete (ASTM C33/C 33M-08) American Standard for Testing Materials international. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. American Standard for Testing Materials (2019). Standard test method for Sampling and Testing Plasticizer used in plastics (ASTM.D1045) American Standard for Testing Materials international [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. American Standard Test Method (2018). Standard Test Method for Slump Flow of Self-Consolidating Concrete. (ASTM C1611) American Standard for Testing Materials international [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. American Standard for Testing Materials (2021) Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. (ASTM C39/C39M-21) ASTM International, West Conshohocken. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. American Standard for Testing Materials (2017). Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. (ASTM C496/C496M-17) American Standard for Testing Materials international [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Anderson, D. M. W. (1978). Water soluble plant gum exudates – Part 2. The Combrentum gums process Biochem., 13: 4-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bababe, B. (2002). Preview of the roving training workshop for gum Arabic farmers. A paper presented at the training workshop for gum Arabic farmers in Borno, Yobe, Jigawa and Kebbi States, organized by the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, July-August 2002, pp3-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. British Standards European Norms. BS EN 206:2013+A1 (2016). Concrete - Specification, performance, production and conformity. British Standards Institution. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. British Standard European Norms (BS EN 17289-1: 2020) characterization of bulk materials, determination of a size-weighted fine fraction and crystalline silica content – general information and choice of test methods. British Standards Institution. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. British Standard European Norm (BS EN 1008:2002) Standard Specification for Mixing water for concrete. British Standards Institution. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. British Standard European Norm BS EN 197-5:2021 Standard Specification for Portland Cement. British Standards Institution. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. British standard BS EN 12350-9:(2010) Testing fresh concrete Part 9: Self-compacting concrete V-funnel test. British Standards Institution. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. British Standard European Norms BS EN 12350-8 (2010) Testing fresh concrete Self-compacting concrete. Slump flow test. British Standards Institution [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. British Standards BS 8500-2:2023 Specification for constituent materials and concrete. British Standards Institution [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. British Standard European Norms BS EN 12620:2013 Aggregates for concrete. British Standards Institution [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. British Standard European Norms BS EN 1097-6:2022 – TC Tests for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates - Determination of particle density and water absorption. British Standards Institution [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. British Standard European Norms BS EN 12350-10 (2010) Testing fresh concrete Self-compacting concrete. L box test. British Standards Institution [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. British Standard European Norms BS EN 206-9:2010 Concrete Additional rules for self-compacting concrete (SCC). British Standards Institution [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. British Standard European Norms BS EN 12390-6:2021 Testing hardened concrete. Tensile splitting strength of test specimen. British Standards Institution. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. British Standard European Norms BS EN 12390-3:2021 Testing hardened concrete compressive strength of test specimens. British Standards Institution. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Athman M.C., Silvester O. A. and Timothy N. (2018) Use of Gum Arabic as a Superplasticizer in Self Compacting Concrete International Journal of Innovative Science and Modern Engineering (IJISME) ISSN: 2319-6386, Volume-5, Published by: Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering Retrieval Number: D1065045418 & Sciences Publication Pvt. Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. European Federation of National Trade Associations Representing Producers and Applicators of Specialist Building Products. EFNARC. (2005). Specification and guidelines for self-compacting concrete. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Francisco, W. M. R., Larissa da, S. L., Carlucio, R. A., Maria do, S. R. B., Jose, M. C. C., Kirley, M. C., and Roselayne, F. F. (2014) Chemical Modification of Gum Arabic and Its Application in the Encapsulation of Cymbopogon citratus Essential Oil. Journal of Applied Polymer Science DOI: 10.1002/app.41519. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Krishna M. N., Narasimha R. A. V, Ramana R. I.V. and Vijaya S. R. M. (2012) Mix Design Procedure for Self-Compacting Concrete. IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN) e-ISSN: 2250-3021, p-ISSN: 2278-8719, www.iosrjen.org Volume 2, Issue 9 (September 2012), PP 33-41 Length Change of Hydraulic – Cement Mortars Exposed to a Sulphate Solution. ASTM International, Philadelphia, PA, 2003. Book of Standards, 04.01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Lafia-Araga1 R. A. Muhammed N. O, Suleiman M. A. T, Olawuyi B. J, Saidu M, Ata O, Enwere B. C, Abutu J. (2025) Optimization of the Crosslinking Reaction Conditions of Gum Arabic with Sodium Trimetaphosphate (STMP). Nigerian Journal of Polymer Science and Technology, 2025, Vol. 20(2), pp20-33. NJPST Volume 20(2): 2025 ISSN: 1119 – 4111. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mbugua R., Ramadhan, S. and Julius, N. (2016). Effect of Gum Arabic Karroo as a Water-Reducing Admixture in Concrete. Department of Civil Engineering, Tshwane University of Technology, Private Bag X680, Pretoria 0001, South Africa; SalimRW@tut.ac.za (R.S.); NdambukiJM@tut.ac.za (J.N.) Correspondence: mbuguarose12@gmail.com; Tel.: +27-845-990-665 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mohamad N, Zulaika M. S., Samad A. A., Goh W. I., Hadipramana J. and Wirdawati A. (2016) Fresh State and Mechanical Properties of Self Compacting Concrete Incorporating High Volume Fly Ash. Jamilus Research Center, University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Johor, Malaysia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Murata, J. (1984) Flow and deformation of fresh concrete. Matériaux et Constructions 17, 117–129 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02473663 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. NFTA (National Fixing Trees Association) (1991). Acacia Senegal-Gum Tree with promise for Agroforestry. National Fixing Trees Association 91-02 Highlights, , 4p [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Okatahi S. S. and Onyibe J. E. (2017) Production of Gum Arabic extension bulletin no. 78 forestry series no.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Roussel, N., C. Stefani, and Roy. L. R. (2005) From mini-cone test to Abrams cone test: measurement of cement-based materials yield stress using slump tests. Cement and Concrete Research, 35, 817 – 822. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Salahaldein, A. and Abdelnaser, O. (2022). Effect of Superplasticisers to Enhance the Properties of Concrete. Design, construction, maintenance doi: 10.37394/232022.2022.2.13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Umar M.Ali (2023) Production/Export Trade of Gum Arabic In Nigeria. Crossref doi: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajiir/Volume 05Issue02-02 The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations Research (ISSN – 2642-7478) VOLUME 05 ISSUE 02 Pages: 10-16 SJIF IMPACT FACTOR (2020: 5. 498) (2021: 5. 676) (2022: 6. 233) (2023: 7. 059) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Zakka, P.W., Bang P.D., Yohanna H. S., Job O. F., and Anigbogu N.A. (2019). Suitability of Gum Arabic as a Plasticizes in Self-Compacting Concrete: Fresh Concrete Properties. International Journal of Environmental Studies and Safety Research ISSN:2536-7277 (Print): 2536-7285 (Online) Volume 4, Number 1, March 2019 http://www.casirmediapublishing.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Zakka, P.W., Job, O.F. and Anigbogu, N.A. (2015) Ecological Self-Compacting Concrete using Gum Arabic as a plasticizer In: Laryea, S. and Leiringer R. (Eds) Procs 6th West Africa Built Environment Research (WABER) Conference, 10-12 August 2015, Accra, Ghana, 347-356 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]