Planning Provisions of Urban Active Recreation Spaces: A Study of Children's Playground Provisions in Residential Areas of Mysore
Authors
School of Planning and Architecture University of Mysore Department of PlanningManasagangotri, Mysuru-570006 (India)
School of Planning and Architecture University of Mysore Department of PlanningManasagangotri, Mysuru-570006 (India)
School of Planning and Architecture University of Mysore Department of PlanningManasagangotri, Mysuru-570006 (India)
School of Planning and Architecture University of Mysore Department of PlanningManasagangotri, Mysuru-570006 (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150900027
Subject Category: Urban and Regional Planning
Volume/Issue: 15/9 | Page No: 343-352
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-14
Accepted: 2026-09-19
Published: 2026-10-03
Abstract
Although it is often the residual category in statutory land use planning, allocated only after residential, commercial, industrial, and transportation requirements have been satisfied, active recreation space for children, especially neighborhood play grounds, is a fundamental component of child health, development, and the right to play. Using the Revised Master Plan (Revision-II) 2031 created by the Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) as the main source document, this study investigates the planning provisions for urban active recreation space in the residential areas of Mysore city, with particular reference to the provision of children's playgrounds. The study examines the Development Control Regulations that control playground reservation in new residential layouts and within individual building plots, extracts and analyzes data on open space allocation across the 45 planning districts of the Mysore-Nanjangud Local Planning Area, and compares the Master Plan's provisions to national and international recreational space standards, such as the Urban and Regional Development Plans Formulation and Implementation (URDPFI) Guidelines, 2014 and World Health Organization benchmarks. The results demonstrate that only 5.51 percent of the planned 2031 Mysore urban conurbation is made up of open space, including parks and playgrounds, which is significantly less than the per-capita standards suggested by the URDPFI Guidelines. Additionally, the amount of open space provided varies greatly amongst planning districts, with some purely residential districts reporting open space shares of less than 3%. Although the Master Plan's Subdivision Regulations require a minimum 10% reservation for parks, open spaces, and playgrounds in new layouts, this requirement is applied prospectively to new subdivisions and is not retrofitted to the substantial stock of residential areas that have already been developed, creating a structural gap in children's access to playgrounds in older neighbourhoods. Recommendations for population-linked, hierarchical play space criteria and retrofitting procedures for underprivileged residential planning areas are made in the paper's conclusion.
Keywords
urban recreation space; children's playgrounds; land use planning; Mysore; master plan; open space standards; child-friendly cities
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Downloads
References
1. Aerts, J. (2018). Shaping urbanization for children: A handbook on child-responsive urban planning. United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bhonsle, K. D., & Adane, V. S. (2016). Assessing the play provisions for children in urban neighborhoods of India: Case study Nagpur, Maharashtra. Buildings, 6(3), Article 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings6030034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bridgman, R.S. (2023). Child-Friendly Cities: Canadian Perspectives. Children, Youth and Environments, 14, 178 - 200. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Formulating open-space policies for India's cities: The case of Mumbai. (2023). Observer Research Foundation. https://www.orfonline.org/research/formulating-open-space-policies-for-india-s-cities-the-case-of-mumbai [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Fumbiro, A. O. (2025). The importance of play in child development and health. Newport International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 6(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.59298/NIJRMS/2025/6.2.171178 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Gill, T. (2021). Urban playground: How child-friendly planning and design can save cities. RIBA Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Government of India, Ministry of Urban Development. (2014). Urban and Regional Development Plans Formulation and Implementation (URDPFI) guidelines, 2014, Volume I. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Government of Karnataka. (1961). The Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961. Department of Town and Country Planning, Government of Karnataka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Harshitha, K., Yamini, D., Manivith, D.V., & Priya, A.B. (2021). An Open air outdoor Environment for Children in Urban Residential Precinct. 2021 3rd International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICAC3N), 48-54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Impact of population growth on open space in Indian cities: A ward-wise GIS-based assessment. (n.d.). International Journal of Novel Research and Development. https://www.ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2407449.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Latfi, M. F. M., & Abdul Karim, H. (2012). Suitability of planning guidelines for children playing spaces. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 38, 304–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.211 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. McArdle, P. (2001). Children's play. Child: care, health and development, 27 6, 509-14 . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Milteer, R.M., Ginsburg, K.R., & Mulligan, D.A. (2012). The Importance of Play in Promoting Healthy Child Development and Maintaining Strong Parent-Child Bond: Focus on Children in Poverty. Pediatrics, 129, e204 - e213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Mysore Urban Development Authority. (2013). Revised master plan (Revision-II) 2031, Mysore-Nanjangud Local Planning Area, Volume II: Proposals of land use and transportation, and Development Control Regulations. MUDA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. (2011). Census of India 2011: Provisional population totals, Karnataka. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Priya, V. P., & Jadhav, U. (2024). Exploring the nexus: Design characteristics of urban local public spaces and children’s play behavior in Bangalore, India. New Design Ideas, 8(Special Issue), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.62476/ndisi205 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. United Nations Children's Fund, & United Nations Human Settlements Programme. (1997). Children's rights and habitat: Working towards child-friendly cities. UNICEF & UNCHS (Habitat). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. United Nations General Assembly. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Urban design strategies for creating child-friendly neighborhoods: A systematic literature review. (2025). Cities. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264275125002197 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Whitman, E. (2018). The Impact of Social Play on Young Children. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. World Health Organization, United Nations Children's Fund, & United Nations Human Settlements Programme. (2026). Guide to creating urban public spaces for children. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0