Tele-Robotic Gynaecological Surgeries Using the Indigenous SSI Mantra System: A Case Series
Authors
Department of Gynaecological Reproductive Medicine, Her Health Hospital, Bhopal (India)
Department of Research and Development, Her Health Hospital (India)
Department of Gynaecological Reproductive Medicine, Her Health Hospital, Bhopal (India)
Department of Gynaecological Reproductive Medicine, Her Health Hospital, Bhopal (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150700065
Subject Category: Gynecology
Volume/Issue: 15/7 | Page No: 789-795
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-26
Accepted: 2026-07-31
Published: 2026-08-12
Abstract
Background: Tele-surgery is an emerging field that combines robotics, telecommunications, and digital imaging to overcome geographical barriers in healthcare delivery. In India, where advanced surgical expertise is concentrated in metropolitan areas, tele-robotic surgery may provide improved access to minimally invasive surgical care. This study evaluates the feasibility and safety of long-distance tele-robotic gynaecological surgery using an indigenous robotic platform.
Objective: To assess the technical feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of tele-robotic hysterectomy performed using the SSI Mantra 3.0 robotic surgical system.
Methods: A retrospective observational case series was conducted from August to October 2025 at Her Health Hospital, Bhopal. Five patients underwent tele-robotic hysterectomy after ethical approval and informed consent. Procedures were performed using the SSI Mantra 3.0 robotic platform, with remote console operation from geographically separated locations. System performance, communication latency, operative parameters, complications, and postoperative recovery were evaluated.
Results: All five procedures were completed successfully without conversion, intraoperative complications, or technical failure. The mean patient age was 41 ± 4 years. Mean operative time was 124 minutes, docking time was 8 minutes, and estimated blood loss was 41 ± 10 ml. The tele-surgical communication system demonstrated stable performance with average latency of approximately 20 ms and jitter below 10 ms. No connectivity interruption occurred during any procedure. All patients had uncomplicated recovery, with hospital discharge on postoperative day three and no reported postoperative complications.
Conclusion: This preliminary case series demonstrates that long-distance tele-robotic gynaecological surgery using the indigenous SSI Mantra robotic system is feasible and safe. The technology has the potential to expand access to advanced minimally invasive surgery across geographically distant healthcare settings. Larger prospective studies are required to establish broader clinical applicability.
Keywords
Tele-robotic surgery; Robotic hysterectomy; SSI Mantra 3.0; Indigenous robotic system; Gynecologic surgery; Minimally invasive surgery; Tele-surgery; India.
Downloads
References
1. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Rubino F, Smith M, Vix M, Simone M, Mutter D. Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications. Ann Surg. 2002 Apr;235(4):487-92. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200204000-00005. PMID: 11923603; PMCID: PMC1422462. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Anvari M. Telesurgery: remote knowledge translation in clinical surgery. World J Surg. 2007 Aug;31(8):1545-50. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9076-5. Epub 2007 May 30. PMID: 17534550. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Marescaux J, Rubino F. Telesurgery, telementoring, virtual surgery, and telerobotics. Curr Urol Rep. 2003 Apr;4(2):109-13. doi: 10.1007/s11934-003-0036-9. PMID: 12648426. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Reddy K, Gharde P, Tayade H, et al. Advancements in robotic surgery: a comprehensive overview of current utilizations and upcoming frontiers. Cureus. 2023;15(12):e50415. https:// doi. org/ 10. 7759/ cureus. 50415. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Marescaux, J., Leroy, J., Rubino, F., Vix, M., Simone, M., Mutter, D. “Transcontinental Robot-Assisted Remote Telesurgery: Feasibility and Potential Applications.” Annals of Surgery. Vol. 235, No. 4 (2002): 487–492 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Jacques Marescaux, Leroy J., Rubino F., Vix M., Simone M., Mutter D. “Transcontinental Robot Assisted Remote Telesurgery: Feasibility and Potential Applications.” Annals of Surgery, Vol. 235, No. 4, 2002: 487–492. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Pazzaglia E, Pasquini P, Jamaer E, Traen K, Despierre E, Mottrie A. Pioneering telesurgery in gynecology: the first European case of total hysterectomy. J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 8;19(1):460. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02638-1. PMID: 40779084; PMCID: PMC12334479. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Pazzaglia E, Pasquini P, Jamaer E, Traen K, Despierre E, Mottrie A. Pioneering telesurgery in gynecology: the first European case of total hysterectomy. J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 8;19(1):460. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02638-1. PMID: 40779084; PMCID: PMC12334479. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Sinha R, Bana R, Sanjay M: Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for the large uterus. JSLS.2019, 23:e2018. 10.4293/JSLS.2018.0006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. SSI Mantra Robotic Surgical System. [Internet]. Gurgaon (India): SS Innovations International Inc.; [cited 2025 Jul 10]. Available from: https://ssinnovations.com/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M, Butner SE, Smith MK. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature. 2001 Sep 27;413(6854):379-80. doi: 10.1038/35096636. Erratum in: Nature 2001 Dec 13;414(6865):710. PMID: 11574874. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Motiwala ZY, Desai A, Bisht R, Lathkar S, Misra S, Carbin DD. Telesurgery: current status and strategies for latency reduction. J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 12;19(1):153. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02333-1. PMID: 40220039. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Borahay MA, Tapısız ÖL, Alanbay İ, Kılıç GS. Outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for benign conditions in obese patients. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2018 Jun 4;19(2):72-77. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.2018.0018. Epub 2018 Apr 27. PMID: 29699956; PMCID: PMC5994808. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Sinha R, Sanjay M, Rupa B, Kumari S. Robotic surgery in gynecology. J Minim Access Surg. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):50-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.147690. PMID: 25598600; PMCID: PMC4290120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Nobbenhuis MAE, Gul N, Barton-Smith P, O'Sullivan O, Moss E, Ind TEJ; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Robotic surgery in gynaecology: Scientific Impact Paper No. 71 (July 2022). BJOG. 2023 Jan;130(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17242. Epub 2022 Jul 17. PMID: 35844092. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Sinha R, Sanjay M, Rupa B, Kumari S. Robotic surgery in gynecology. J Minim Access Surg. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):50-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.147690. PMID: 25598600; PMCID: PMC4290120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]