00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Varying Approaches to Dropout Control in Engineering Colleges: A Narrative Literature Review.

Authors

Kemon Juwara

University of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, Brikama Campus, West Coast Region, The Gambia. (Gambia)

Musa FM Danso

University of The Gambia, School of Arts and Sciences, Department of English Language, Faraba Campus (Gambia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150800007

Subject Category: Literature

Volume/Issue: 15/8 | Page No: 127-139

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-03

Accepted: 2026-06-08

Published: 2026-09-01

Abstract

Dropping out of engineering colleges or programs increases sustainable skill gaps and future dependency rates among young people. Therefore, this study used systematic literature review to explore relevant theories, methods and practices related to dropout behavior prevention or control among engineering students in higher education institutions. Using PRISMA guidelines, the review identified 252 studies and reviewed 43 studies relevant to dropout prevention in engineering colleges. The findings revealed diverse approaches to student retention. It also found pedagogical variation as the frequent and effective intervention while andragogy/seminar, machine learning /data, mindset training and systemic/policy remains least effective measures. The study discusses the implications, recommendations, limitations and future research direction.

Keywords

School dropout; Intervention theories; Intervention methods; Systematic literature review; Engineering education.

Downloads

References

1. Babapour Vajari, M. S. (2023). The Role of Learning Experiences in Choosing Agricultural Engineering Majors Based on Krumboltz's Social Learning Theory of Career Choice. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 18(2), 181-196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bajar, & Bajar., J. (2019). Technology: Dropout prevention by increasing parent involvement through text messaging. Suló. International Refereed Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences, 7(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bandura, A. (1969). Social-learning theory of identificatory processes. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 213–262). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. International Universities Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bergeson, T. &. Heuschel, M. A (2005). Promising programs and practices for dropout prevention. Report to the. Legislature, Washington State Legislature [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Budinoff, H. D. (2020, June). Engineering graphics in a community college setting: Challenges and opportunities. In 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access. American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34553. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bullington, K. E., Tomovic, C. L., Jovanovic, V., Dean, A. W., White-Levatich, A., & Landaeta, R. (2021). Enhancing adult learners' sense of community in engineering degrees: Preliminary results. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 22(4), 47–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bustamante-Mora, A., Diéguez-Rebolledo, M., Hormazábal, Y., Valdés, Y., & Cadena, R. (2023). Learning models for higher education in engineering: Motivation, self-determination, and the role of information and communication technologies. Sustainability, 15(18), 13869. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813869 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Campbell, A. L., Direito, I., & Mokhithi, M. (2021). Developing growth mindsets in engineering students: A systematic literature review of interventions. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(4), 503–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1903835 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cherry, K. (2022, March 14). How social learning theory works. Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/social-learning-theory-2795074 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Essa. (2018, August 3). Task-centred practice & cognitive-behavioural therapy use to support change in social work. UKEssays.com. https://www.ukessays.com/essays/social-work/task-centred-practice-and-cognitive-behavioural-therapy-social-work-essay.php [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and Society, 2nd Edn New York. NY: Norton.[Google Scholar]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity youth and crisis (No. 7). WW Norton & company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Getting, P. A. (1989). Emerging principles governing the operation of neural networks. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 12, 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.12.030189.001153 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Guo, X. (2016). The Influencing Factors of College Students’ Learning Burnout and Its Intervention. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Haag, S., Guilbeau, E., & Goble, W. (2006). Assessing engineering internship efficacy: Industry's perception of student performance. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(2), 257–263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hashemikamangar, S., Ivey, S., Stewart, E., & Robinson, C. (2024). [Title not specified] [Conference paper]. In 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hutchinson, G. S., & Oltedal, S. (2014). Five theories in social work (UiN-report;1/2014). Nord University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Katona, J., & Gyonyoru, K. I. K. (2026). Enhancing programming education through AI-driven tools and innovative pedagogical models: a systematic study on student engagement, retention, and self-regulation. Journal of Computers in Education, 1-43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Li, Q., Herbert, C., Yeom, J., & Montgomery, J. (2022). Retention factors in STEM education identified using learning analytics: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 37, 100485 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Luhmann (1995) proposed that society operates as an autopoietic system of communications.. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Medvedeva, M. (2023). Motivational factor in the personnel management system at modern production enterprises. E3S Web of Conferences, 371, 06018. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202337106018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Meichenbaum., D. (1977). Cognitive behavior modification. Cognitive Behavior Therapy. 6(4), 185-192. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff, Altman. , D. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine., 151(4), 264-269. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Munley, P. (1975). Erik Erikson's theory of psychosocial development and vocational behavior. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 22(4), 314.-319. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Murray, Hendry, & McQuade, M. (2020). Civil Engineering 4 Real (CE 4 R): co-curricular learning for undergraduates. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(1), 128-150., 45(1), 128-150 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Noguez Córdoba, M. A. (2026). Difficulties perceived by first-year engineering students at the Autonomous University of Mexico City [Doctoral dissertation or institutional report]. Autonomous University of Mexico City. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Palomino, & Ortega., J. (.2023). Dropout Intentions in Higher Education: Systematic Literature Review: Systematic Literature Review. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 16(2), 149-158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Rapp, & Corral-Granados., A. (2021). Understanding inclusive education–a theoretical contribution from system theory and the constructionist perspective. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1946725 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Reid, W. J., & Epstein, L. (1972). Task-centered casework. (No Title). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Rubio-Tobar, X. (2025). Factores de deserción estudiantil y estrategias de retención en carreras universitarias de Ingeniería y Áreas Técnicas. Revista Científica FINIBUS-Ingeniería, Industria y Arquitectura, 8(15), 133-142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Rumberger, R. W., & Lim, S. A. (2008). Why students drop out of school: A review of 25 years of research (California Dropout Research Project Report No. 15). UC Santa Barbara. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Schachter, B. (1974). Task-Centered Casework, by William J. Reid and Laura Epstein. Columbia University Press, New York, 1972. $10.00, 375. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Shah, R., & Gillen, A. L. (2023). A systematic literature review of university-industry partnerships in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 49(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2253741 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Stewart, & Lah., E. (2023). New cognitive-behavioral intervention with Theory of Mind (ToM) training for children with epilepsy experiencing social difficulties. In Handbook of Lifespan Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. (pp. 449-458). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Tang, L., Zhang, F., Yin, R., & Fan, Z. (2021). Effect of interventions on learning burnout: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 645662. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.645662 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Tennant, Murray, Gilmour, & Brown, L. S. (2018). Industrial work placement in higher education: a study of civil engineering student engagement. Industry and Higher Education, 32(2), 108-118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Trivedi, S. (2022). Improving students’ retention using machine learning: Impacts and implications. Science Open Preprints. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Villa, M., de la Torre, L., & Sánchez, J. (2024). Gender factors and strategies that promote women's retention in engineering and STEM MOOCs: A systematic literature review. IEEE Transactions on Education, 67(3), 456–468. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Writer, S. (2020). Social work guide: Theories used in social work. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkguide.org/resources/theories-used-in-social-work. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.