Comparative Study on AutoCAD and Revit: Student Proficiency and Perception across Academic Levels

Abstract: This study examines students' proficiency in AutoCAD and their perceptions of Revit within engineering programs, exploring variations across academic levels and the impact of demographic factors. Using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 27), descriptive and inferential statistical  techniques  were applied,  including  means,  standard  deviations,  independent  samples  t‐tests, correlation analysis, and multiple regression. Findings indicate no statistically significant differences in AutoCAD proficiency or Revit perception between first‐ and second‐year students, suggesting that additional academic experience alone does not affect skill level or perception. A positive correlation was observed between AutoCAD proficiency and Revit perception, implying that a strong foundation in AutoCAD enhances students' confidence and openness to learning advanced software like Revit. Regression analysis further revealed that gender and academic major did not significantly predict AutoCAD proficiency or Revit perception. The high Cronbach’s Alpha (0.988) indicates  strong  internal  consistency  in  the  measurement  scale, validating the reliability of the findings. These results highlight the importance of structured, progressive curriculum design that reinforces foundational CAD skills, facilitating smoother transitions to advanced tools and better preparing students for industry requirements. The study emphasizes the need for continuous skills reinforcement to enhance software adaptability and professional readiness in technical fields.

Civil engineering

1. C. Eastman, P. Teicholz, R. Sacks, and K. Liston, A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers, and Contractors, 2nd Ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.., 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. O. Olugboyega and A. Windapo, “Framework for integrating BIM education in the curriculum of AEC programs,” 10th SACQSP Int. Res. Conf. 2018, no. June, p. 15, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. K. Y. Rodríguez-Rodríguez and J. L. Dávila-Perez, “Framework Development to Introduce BIM into the Civil Engineering Undergraduate Curriculum at University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Campus,” Constr. Res. Congr. 2016 Old New Constr. Technol. Converg. Hist. San Juan - Proc. 2016 Constr. Res. Congr. CRC 2016, pp. 68–77, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. A. F. Shahverdi, F. Mostafavi, S. H. Roodkoly, Z. S. Zomorodian, and H. Homayouni, “Developing a Pedagogical Framework for an Integrated and BIM-Based High-Performance Design Studio: Experimental Case Study,” J. Archit. Eng., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. S. Berkan, S. K. Öztas, F. İ. Kara, and A. E. Vardar, “The Role of Spatial Ability on Architecture Education,” Des. Technol. Educ., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 103–126, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. M. S. Raza, B. A. Tayeh, Y. I. Abu Aisheh, and A. M. Maglad, “Potential features of building information modeling (BIM) for application of project management knowledge areas in the construction industry,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 9, p. e19697, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. G. O. Deniz, “Emerging cad and bim trends in the aec education: An analysis from students’ perspective,” J. Inf. Technol. Constr., vol. 23, no. April 2016, pp. 138–156, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. K. H. McCord et al., “Computing in AEC Education: Hindsight, Insight, and Foresight,” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. K. Ezeji, “Influence Of Regular Access To Cad Lecture Rooms On Achievement Of Cad Proficiency Amongst Students In Architecture Schools In Southeast Nigeria,” J. Multidiscip. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. M. A. Almulla, “The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach as a Way to Engage Students in Learning,” SAGE Open, vol. 10, no. 3, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. M. Shelbourn, J. Macdonald, T. McCuen, and S. Lee, “Students’ perceptions of BIM education in the higher education sector: A UK and US perspective,” Ind. High. Educ., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 293–304, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. N. Z. Ubaidillah, N. N. Baharuddin, N. Kasil, and F. Ismail, “Students’ Perception of the Use of Technology in Education,” Environ. Proc. J., vol. 5, no. 15, pp. 117–122, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. O. Bukunova and A. Bukunov, “Building Information Modeling for Sustainable Construction,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1079, no. 3, p. 032080, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. O. Zaed et al., “Developing a BIM integrated curriculum framework for undergraduate architectural education in Libya,” Second Natl. Conf. Dev. High. Educ. institutions Libya, Beni Walid, Libya, 7 Oct. 2021, pp. 1–16, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. A. Waqar, I. Othman, N. Saad, M. Azab, and A. M. Khan, “BIM in green building: Enhancing sustainability in the small construction project,” Clean. Environ. Syst., vol. 11, no. July, p. 100149, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. D. K. Amro and H. Dawoud, “Influencing Factors of Spatial Ability for Architecture and Interior Design Students: A Fuzzy DEMATEL and Interpretive Structural Model,” Buildings, vol. 14, no. 9, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. S. Tijo-Lopez, G. Mejía, and O. Portilla-Carreño, “Inclusion of BIM and Sustainability in Construction Education through Capstone Design Projects,” Constr. Res. Congr. 2024, CRC 2024, vol. 4, pp. 315–324, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. C. Eastman, P. Teicholz, R. Sacks, and K. Liston, BIM Handbook: A guide to Building Information Modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors, 2nd Ed., vol. 12, no. 3. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. M. Ü. Meterelliyöz and O. Ö. Özener, “Bim-Enabled Learning for Building Systems and Technology,” J. Inf. Technol. Constr., vol. 27, no. September 2019, pp. 1–19, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. J. Maina, “Cad and Bim in Architecture Education : Awareness , Proficiency,” J. Sci., vol. 6, no. 4, December 2018, pp. 167–178, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Patriarchy and Gender Roles in Shobhaa De's Second Thoughts and Easterine Kire’s Life on Hold
• Comparative Effects of Zeolite and Fly Ash on Soil Properties and Agricultural Productivity
• Assessing Interrelationships among Banking Satisfaction, Cooperative Perspectives and Rural Service Beliefs in Cooperative Banking in Northern Nigeria
• High-Performance Alloys and Composites’ Applications in Production Engineering
• Integrating Tidal Energy into Sub-Saharan Africa’s Power Mix: A Strategic Framework for Renewable Energy Expansion