The Effectiveness of Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Electronic Commerce Disputes.

Abstract: The heavy reliance of electronic communication tools to conduct businesses across the world has facilitated business transactions and other related aspects of business. An evaluation on the effectiveness of resolving e-commerce disputes by alternative dispute resolution methods (ADR) is dwelled upon in this article. There are many problems associated by relying on the traditional adjudication processes in courts to resolve e-commerce transaction disputes amongst which are; high cost, waste of time, corruption and jurisdictional problems. Disputes arising from e-commerce transaction are most often complicated to be resolved by courts based on this.  This article raises questions on the effectiveness of using ADR mechanisms to resolve such disputes and shows its advantages. It also raises questions on the effectiveness of using the normal courts processes. The article is timely because of the heavy reliance nowadays on e-commerce and the frequency of disputes arising from such. The methodology used is qualitative with the use of the doctrinal research methods. The findings of this research is beneficial to the business world, business persons, those charged with conducting ADR and students of business and commercial law.  Its findings reveal that processes like arbitration, mediation and online dispute resolution are more effective and accepted by contending parties in resolving their disputes as opposed to litigation. It is therefore recommended that e-disputants should use the opportunities and tools provided under ADR and Online dispute resolution (ODR) to resolve their disputes. That the ODR framework and guidelines should be properly established as a dispute resolution mechanism with worldwide recognition. It is also recommended that reciprocity amongst states should be encouraged in solving e-commerce transactions disputes. ADR methods being more effective in resolving e-commerce disputes, the education community is encouraged to incorporate e-commerce dispute settlement courses in their syllabuses with continuous training on the topic. That countries should encourage reciprocity to easily recognize and enforce ADR and ODR decisions.

Effectiveness, Dispute Resolution, e- commerce, Transactions

1. 1. Appley, George, ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution and the civil justice system’, in Mackie, Karl J, A handbook of dispute resolution: ADR in action. Routledge, London, 1991. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. 2. Briggs, A., The Conflict of Laws. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. 3. Burnstein, Matthew,. ‘A Global Network’, in Boele Woelki, Katharina and Kessedjian, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. 4. Catherine., Which Court Decides? Which Law Applies? The Hague ; Boston : Kluwer Law International, c1998. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. 5. Cherry Lisco, Cara. ‘Case Study in Online Mediation: Resolution Across Borders.’http://www.ombuds.org/cyberweek2002/library/lisco_ecommerce_article.doc [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. 6. Clarkson, CMV and Hill, Jonathan., Jeffey on the Conflict of Laws. Second Edition. Butterworths, 2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. 7. 7.Conley Tyler, M. (2003), ‘Seventy-six and Counting: An Analysis of ODR Sites,’ in Katsh, E.and D. Choi, Proceedings of the UNECE Second Forum on Online Dispute Resolution, Center for Information Technology and Dispute Resolution, University of Massachusetts. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. 8. De Ly, Filip., International business law and lex mercatoria , North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1992. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. 9. Hill, Jonathan., The law relating to international commercial disputes, Lloyd's of London Press, London, New York, 1994. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. 10. Katsh, E., J. Rifkin and A. Gaitenby. ‘E-commerce, E-disputes, and E-dispute Resolution: In the Shadow of “eBay Law”.’ Ohio State J. of Dispute Resolution, 15(3), 705-734. (2000) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. 11. 11.Lagarde, Paul and Giuliano, Mario., Report on the Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations, Journal officiel n° C 282 du 31/10/1980 p. 0001 – 0050. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. 12. 12.Lessig, L., Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, New York: Basic Books, 1999. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. 13. 13.Lessig, L., The future of ideas : the fate of the commons in a connected world, Vintage Books, New York, 2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. 14. 14.Mackie, Karl J., A handbook of dispute resolution: ADR in action. Routledge, London, 1991. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. 15. 15.Nott, Susan M.., ‘For better or worse? The Europeanization of the Conflict of Laws’, in Liverpool Law Review. Volume 24. Nos. 1-2, 2002, 3-17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. 16. Reidenberg, Joel R., ‘Lex Informatica: The Formulation of Information Policy Rules through Technolog’y , 76 TEXAS L. REV. 553 (1998) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. 17. 17.Reidenberg, Joel R., ‘Technology and Internet Jurisdiction’, 153 University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 2005. http://ssrn.com/abstract=691501 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. 18. 18.Rothchild, John,. ‘Jurisdiction over E-Commerce Transactions: United States Law’. http://hcch.e-vision.nl/upload/wop/e-comm_rothchid.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. 19. Schultz, Thomas, Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler, Dirk Langer, and Vincent Bonnet. ‘Online Dispute Resolution: State of the Art, Issues, and Perspectives.’ Report of the E-Com Research Project of the University of Geneva, p.78. Geneva. (2001). http://www.online-adr.org/reports/TheBlueBook-2001.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. 20. Tyler, Tom., ‘Procedure of resul’t, in Mackie, Karl J, A handbook of dispute resolution: ADR in action. Routledge, London, 1991. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. 21. Van der Hof, Simone, ‘The relevance of party autonomy with respect to international online B2B contracts – A European and US perspective’. http://hcch.e-vision.nl/upload/wop/e-comm_vdhof.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. International Conventions [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. 1. Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations (80/934/EEC). http://www.rome-convention.org/instruments/i_rep_lagarde_en.htm. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. 2. Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. 1958 http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/arbitration/NYConvention.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. 3. Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, of 22 December 2000, on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters [Official Journal L 12 of 16.01.2001]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. 4. European Convention On International Commercial Arbitration. http://www.law.berkeley.edu/faculty/ddcaron/Documents/RPID%20Documents/rp04011.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. 5. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985). http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.arbitration.model.law.1985/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. 6. Vienna Convention for the International Sale of Goods. http://www.cisg-online.ch [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Reports [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. 1. OECD (2002b) Report on Legal Provisions Related to Business [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. 2. Consumer Alternative Dispute Resolution in Relation to Privacy and Consumer Protection, OECD, Paris, www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2002doc.nsf/linkto/dsti-iccp-reg-cp(2002)1-final [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. 3. 2004 Statistical Report, ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, Vol. 16/No.1. p 21 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Websites [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. 1. The Hague Conference on Private International Law. http://www.hcch.net/ ( Accessed on the 11th of April 2017) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. 2. LexMercatoria.org, (Accessed on the 10th of March 2017). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. 3. UNIDROIT http://www.unidroit.org/. (Accessed on the 15th of April 2017) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. 4. Wiki pedía. http://en.wikipedia.org (Accessed on the 5th day of July 2017) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Exploring the Concept of Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Narrative Review
• Design, Development, and Evaluation of a Critiquing-Based Mobile-Web Employment Recommender System
• Integrating Bhagavad Gita Principles with Modern Supply Chain Management: A Framework for Ethical and Resilient Operations
• Soilless Indoor Farming: A Systematic Review of Iot-Based Monitoring Systems and Physiochemical Characterization Methods for Lactuca Sativa
• Financial Awareness: A Survey of Students in Bhopal