00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

 Security Implications and Mitigation Strategies for One-To-Many Order Preserving Encryption in Cloud Data Search

Authors

Sedhu Madhavan

Master of Computer Application,Vels University, Chennai (IN)

Dr. Lipsa Nayak

Master of Computer Application,Vels University, Chennai (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.140400080

Subject Category: Cloud Computing

Volume/Issue: 14/4 | Page No: 694-699

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-05-16

Published: 2025-05-16

Abstract

Abstract: Cloud computing offers a flexible and efficient method for data sharing, benefiting both individuals and society. However, users may hesitate to store shared data on external servers due to concerns about the sensitive nature of the information. To address this, implementing cryptographic access control is essential. Identity-based encryption (IBE) serves as a valuable cryptographic approach to establishing secure data-sharing systems. Nonetheless, access control needs to be dynamic. When a user's authorization expires, there must be a mechanism to revoke their access, ensuring they cannot retrieve either previously or newly shared data. To achieve this, we introduce the concept of Revocable-Storage Identity-Based Encryption (RS-IBE), which ensures both forward and backward security by incorporating user revocation and cipher text updates.


We further present a concrete RS-IBE construction and validate its security within a defined model. Performance comparisons highlight the scheme's advantages in functionality and efficiency, making it a viable and cost-effective solution for secure data sharing. Additionally, implementation results showcase its practical applicability. The RS-IBE scheme is proven to be adaptively secure under the decisional ℓ-DBHE assumption in the standard model. Comparative analysis confirms that our approach is efficient and functional, making it suitable for real-world applications.

Keywords

Cloud computing, data security, Identity-Based Encryption (IBE),, Revocable-Storage Identity-Based Encryption (RS-IBE, cryptographic access control, user revocation, forward security, backward security, cipher text update, secure data sharing,, encryption mechanism, privacy protection, key management, access control policies, cryptographic protocols

Downloads

References

1. 1. HuaqunWang; Yuqing Zhang , On the Knowledge Soundness of a Cooperative Provable Data Possession Scheme in Multi-cloud Storage. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems Year: 2014 Volume: 25 , Issue: 1 ,Pages: 264 - 267 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. 2. S. Vishnupriya ; P. Saranya ; A. Rajasri , Secure multi-cloud stockpiling with strategy based access control and helpful provable information ownership , Date of Conference: 27-28 Feb. 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. 3. Lino Abraham Varghese ; S. Bose , Integrity check in multi distributed storage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. 4. AnnamalaiRajendran ; V Balasubramanian ; T Mala , Integrity check utilizing Identity based Provable Data Possession in multi stockpiling cloud. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. 5. Jian Mao ; Yan Zhang ; Pei Li ; XiandongXu ; Teng Li ; Jianwei Liu2014 Communications Security Conference (CSC 2014), ETCIC: A mistake tolerant substance trustworthiness checking plan in multi-cloud putting away . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. 6. Li Haoyu ; Li Qingpeng ; Zhang Longjun ; GaoZhiqiang ,Integrity Verification Scheme for Dynamic Cloud Data Based on Multi-Branching Tree . Year: 2017 Pages: 365 - 368 IEEE Conferences [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. 7. Boyang Wang ; Hui Li ; Xuefeng Liu ; Fenghua Li ; Xiaoqing Li , Efficient open check on the respectability of multi-proprietor information in the cloud [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. 8. Praveena.A ;Sasikala.C ,Multi expert quality based encryption against information trustworthiness and versatility issues in cloud information administrations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. 9. Su Peng ; Fucai Zhou ; Qiang Wang ; ZifengXu ; JianXu , Identity-Based Public Multi-Replica Provable Data Possession. IEEE Access Year: 2017 Volume: 5 Pages: 34-45 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. 10. S. Ruj, M. Stojmenovic, and A. Nayak, “Decentralized access control with anonymous authentication of data stored in storages,” Parallel and Distributed Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 384–394, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. 11. X. Huang, J. Liu, S. Tang, Y. Xiang, K. Liang, L. Xu, and J. Zhou, “Cost-effective authentic and anonymous data sharing with forward security,” Computers, IEEE Transactions on, 2014, doi:10.1109/TC.2014.2315619. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. 12. C.-K. Chu, S. S. Chow, W.-G. Tzeng, J. Zhou, and R. H. Deng, “Key-aggregate cryptosystem for scalable data sharing in storage storage,” Parallel and Distributed Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 468–477, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. 13. Azure. (2014) Azure storage service. [Online]. Available: http://www.windowsazure.com/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. 14. Amazon. (2014) Amazon simple storage service (amazon s3). [Online]. Available: http://aws.amazon.com/s3/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. 15. K. Chard, K. Bubendorfer, S. Caton, and O. F. Rana, “Social cloud computing: A vision for socially motivated resource sharing,” Services Computing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 551–563, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. 16. C. Wang, S. S. Chow, Q. Wang, K. Ren, and W. Lou, “Privacypreserving public auditing for secure storage storage,” Computers, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 362–375, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. 17. G. Anthes, “Security in the storage,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 16–18, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. 18. K. Yang and X. Jia, “An efficient and secure dynamic auditing protocol for data storage in cloud computing,” Parallel and Distributed Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1717–1726, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. 19. B. Wang, B. Li, and H. Li, “Public auditing for shared data with efficient user revocation in the storage,” in INFOCOM, 2013 Proceedings IEEE. IEEE, 2013, pp. 2904–2912. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.