00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Application of Life Cycle Costing Models for Evaluating Operating Costs in Large Construction Projects

Authors

Kissabekov Almas

Specialist degree, Kazakh Academy of Transport and Communications named M. Tynyshpayev, Almaty, Kazakhstan (KZ)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.140500013

Subject Category: project life cycle, operational costs, operation, construction, Life Cycle Costing

Volume/Issue: 14/5 | Page No: 88-93

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-05-31

Published: 2025-05-31

Abstract

Abstract: The article examines the application of Life Cycle Costing models for assessing and managing operational costs in large-scale construction projects. It analyzes the development of the Life Cycle Costing concept, its theoretical foundations, and practical applications. Special attention is given to the impact of Life Cycle Costing models on decision-making processes, as well as methods for accounting for risks and uncertainties. A comparative analysis of various models is conducted, highlighting their advantages and limitations. An original classification of LCC models is proposed based on their analytical complexity and suitability for different project contexts. A case-based simulation is presented to demonstrate how scenario analysis and uncertainty modeling affect long-term cost outcomes. The study results emphasize the importance of utilizing Life Cycle Costing to optimize costs and improve construction efficiency in the long term.

Keywords

project life cycle, operational costs, operation, construction, Life Cycle Costing

Downloads

References

1. Chen R., Samuelson H., Zou Y., Zheng X., Cao Y. Improving building resilience in the face of future climate uncertainty: A comprehensive framework for enhancing building life cycle performance. // Energy and Buildings. 2024. Vol. 302. P. 113761. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113761 EDN: LXFDHT [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Yarov Y. Modern architectural approaches to building design: integrating eco-friendly solutions and advanced technologies // New science: from idea to result. 2024. No. 11. P. 139-147. EDN: CLINTG [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Lei Y., Dong L. Building sustainability assessment model based on life cycle cost analysis and BIM technology. // International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2024. Vol. 21. №. 4. P. 4089-4100. DOI: 10.1007/s13762-023-05272-2 EDN: XQQZBO [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Tokede O., Globa A. Application of the ten LCSA principles of the Life Cycle Initiative: the perspective of the building sector. // InHandbook on Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment. 2024. P. 290-303. DOI: 10.4337/9781800378650.00032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kidassova M. Innovative business strategies in the digital transformation era // Economic Development Research Journal. 2025. No. 1. P. 118-124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Zharmagambetov Ye. Portfolio Immunization and Debt Maturity Management Strategies // Innovations and Investments. 2025/1. №. 1. P. 451-456. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Auza A., Asadi E., Chenari B., da Silva MG Review of cost objective functions in multi-objective optimization analysis of buildings. // Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2024. Vol. 1. №. 191. P. 114101. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.114101 EDN: IUWMIH [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Zharmagambetov Ye. Interest rate risk management and its impact on investment portfolios: the effect of interest rate fluctuations on financial assets and hedging instruments. // Financial Markets and Banks. 2024. №. 12. P. 570–574. EDN: COGGVJ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.