00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Analysis of Quality-Of-Service Parameters in Mobile Networks. Case Study of Kenyan Based Mobile Providers: A Consumer Perspective

Authors

Omondi James Okeda

Affiliation: Ecole Superiuere Robert de Sorbom a PhD Thesis 2017 (KE)

Roseline Atieno Aduda

Affiliation: Ecole Superiuere Robert de Sorbom a PhD Thesis 2017 (KE)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.140500033

Subject Category: Technology and Academic communication

Volume/Issue: 14/5 | Page No: 266-313

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-06-08

Published: 2025-06-07

Abstract

Abstract: This study presents a comprehensive analysis of Quality-of-Service (QoS) parameters in Kenyan mobile networks, emphasizing the consumer perspective between 2015 and 2017. The primary objective was to evaluate the performance of major Kenyan mobile service providers by examining key QoS dimensions such as network coverage, connection speed, service reliability, and customer satisfaction. Utilizing a mixed-methods research design, the study combined quantitative data from large-scale network measurements and consumer surveys with qualitative insights gathered through interviews and focus group discussions.


Data collection encompassed diverse geographical locations and user demographics to ensure representativeness, and rigorous statistical techniques were employed to analyze the results. Findings revealed significant variability among providers with respect to service availability and quality, highlighting areas where improvements are critical. Notably, while network coverage was generally satisfactory in urban centers, rural and marginalized regions experienced considerable service gaps. Consumer feedback underscored challenges related to intermittent connectivity, slow data speeds, and perceived transparency in service delivery.


The significance of this study lies in its empirical evidence-based approach, informing stakeholders — including policymakers, industry regulators, and service providers — about prevailing QoS conditions and consumer experiences in Kenya's evolving telecommunications landscape. By focusing on the consumer dimension, the research advances understanding of how technical performance metrics translate into real-world user satisfaction and offers actionable recommendations to enhance mobile network quality and inclusivity in Kenya.

Keywords

Technology and Academic communication

Downloads

References

1. Adanu, S. K., & Olabode, A. A. (2016). Mobile data quality of service in Ghana: Measurement and user perception. International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences, 9(04), 141-152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Airtel Networks Kenya Limited. (2015-2017). Collection of annual reports, financial statements, press releases, and customer service promotional materials published between 2015 and 2017. Airtel Kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Babbie, E. (2013). The practice of social research (13th ed.). Wadsworth Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Balaji, K. V., Sathish, K. V., & Reddy, K. E. (2013). A study on QoS and QoE issues in mobile broadband networks. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST), 5(05), 1025-1031. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Communications Authority of Kenya. (2015-2017). Collection of quarterly and annual sector statistics reports, quality of service performance reports, market analysis reports, and QoS monitoring methodology documents released by the Authority between 2015 and 2017. CA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Consumer Federation of Kenya (COFEK). (2015-2017). Reports on telecommunications consumer complaints and satisfaction surveys conducted or published between 2015 and 2017. Consumer Federation of Kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Engelke, R., Melchiors, T., & Möller, S. (2010). Quality of Experience (QoE) in mobile telecommunications: A review. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) (pp. 141-146). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. ETSI. (2015). ETSI TR 102 484 V1.2.1: Human Factors; Quality of Service (QoS) and Quality of Experience (QoE); Measurement methodologies. ETSI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Finserve Africa Limited / Equity Bank. (2015-2017). Selected corporate reports on Equitel service performance, subscriber growth, and financial inclusion initiatives published between 2015 and 2017. Equity Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gichuhi, A. W., Bwisa, H., & Kihoro, J. (2015). Factors influencing perceived quality of M-Pesa services by Kenyatta University students. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 4(11), 1325-1331. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gorcun, O. F., Arslan, F., & Altintas, O. (2015). Bridging the gap between objective and subjective quality of experience in mobile networks. In 2015 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC) (pp. 36-40). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. ITU-T. (2008). Recommendation E.800: Terms and definitions related to quality of service and network performance including recommendations related to future networks. ITU. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. ITU-T. (2017). Recommendation P.10/G.100: Vocabulary for performance and quality of service. ITU. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Khan, S. A., Ahmad, A., & Iqbal, M. W. (2017). A study of crowd-sourced quality of experience for mobile networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 78, 270-284. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kuria, J. K., & Makau, J. N. (2016). Mobile network coverage and the digital divide in rural Kenya. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Research, 6(2), 25-33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mas, I., & Morawczynski, O. (2009). Imagining the future of money: The case of M-Pesa in Kenya. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (4857). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mosleh, A., Raahemi, B., & Ibnkahla, M. (2016). A survey on Quality of Experience (QoE) in mobile networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(4), 2811-2847. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Munylwel, K., Kibet, K., & Chirchir, K. (2015). Customer satisfaction with mobile network quality in Nairobi, Kenya: An adapted SERVQUAL model. International Journal of Business and Commerce, 4(8), 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mwangi, S. M., & Muturi, W. (2014). The influence of mobile network quality on customer satisfaction in the telecommunication sector in Kenya. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 3(6), 1-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Oyeniyi, A., & Abiodun, A. (2012). An empirical study of consumer satisfaction with mobile telecommunication services in Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(20), 153-162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Safaricom PLC. (2015-2017). Collection of annual reports, investor briefings, press releases, and sustainability reports published between 2015 and 2017. Safaricom PLC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Telkom Kenya Limited. (2015-2017). Collection of announcements, press releases, and promotional materials published between 2015 and 2017. Telkom Kenya Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.