00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Optimizing Workflow Scheduling for Web Servers in Hybrid Cloud Computing: Balancing Delay Sensitivity and Performance Efficiency

Authors

Er. Manpreet Singh

1Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Sant Baba Bhag Singh University, Jalandhar, Punjab (IN)

Er. Akashdeep Singh Rana

Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Sant Baba Bhag Singh University, Jalandhar, Punjab (IN)

Er. Simran

Research Scholar, Department of CSE, GNA University, Phagwara, Punjab (IN)

Er. Hitakshi

Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Sant Baba Bhag Singh University, Jalandhar, Punjab (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.140500082

Subject Category: Cloud Computing

Volume/Issue: 14/5 | Page No: 768-776

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-06-20

Published: 2025-06-19

Abstract

Abstract: To develop an efficient operations organizing optimization of internet servers that will certainly bring great concessions to satisfy the operations job hold-up prerequisite and also efficiency demand. Techniques: This research provides a delay aware as well as performance-efficient power optimization (DAPEEO) strategy for operations implementation in a diverse atmosphere (i.e., edge-cloud setting). This method offers an operations implementation version which satisfies the application hold-up requirement together with efficiency need. Searching for: Our design has actually been developed to lower the power usage, rise throughput, lower computational price together with computational time to give a delay-aware along with performance-efficient operations design for the internet servers in crossbreed cloud computer. Our design Delay Aware together with Performance Efficient Workflow Scheduling of Web Servers in Hybrid Cloud Computing Environment (DAPEEO) has actually minimized the power intake by 4.217%, raised the throughput by 19.51%, as well as minimize the computational price by 62.38% when contrasted with the existing”” Deadline-Constrained Cost Optimization for Hybrid Clouds (DCOH)”” designs. Even more, the typical power intake revealed a decrease of 40.993% along with 90.384% when contrasted with the DCOH along with Self- Configuring and also Self-Healing of Cloud-based Resources (RADAR) work version specifically. Experiment end result reveals the DAPEEO strategy accomplishes much superior power effectiveness, throughput along with computation set you back decrease when contrasted with the existing operations implementation design. Uniqueness: Existing version fell short to stabilize decreasing expense, as well as conference operations implementation target dates under a varied atmosphere. Beyond, the DAPEEO works in bringing trade-offs in minimizing power dissipation and also conference job target dates with minimized expense under the edge-cloud computer design.

Keywords

Cloud Computer, Edge Cloud, DAPEEO, Power Effectiveness, Without, Expense

Downloads

References

1. Jambigi MV. Energy-Aware Resource Utilization Technique for Workflow Scheduling in Cloud Computing Environment. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT). 2021;12(10):7461–72. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i10.5652. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Mathew S, Joy KP. Impact of Monosodium Glutamate and Corticosterone in the Hippocampus: Glucocorticoid Regulation and Caspase-3 mediated Microvascular and Neuronal Apoptosis. The FASEB Journal. 2020;34:1– 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Sri raghavendra M, Chawla P, Wu H, Gill SS, Buyya R. DoSP: A Deadline-Aware Dynamic Service Placement Algorithm for Workflow-Oriented IoT Applications in Fog-Cloud Computing Environments.In and others editor.EnergyConservationSolutionsforFog- EdgeComputingParadigms.Springer. 2022;p. 21–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ijaz S, Munir EU, Ahmad SG, Rafique MM, Rana OF. Energy-makes pan optimization of workflow scheduling in fog–cloud computing. Computing. 2021;103(9):2033–2059. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Sana MU, Li Z. Efficiency aware scheduling techniques in cloud computing: a descriptive literature review. PeerJ Computer Science. 2021;7:e509–e509. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.509. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ramathilagam A, VijayalakshmiK. Workflow scheduling in cloud environment using an ovel meta- heuristic optimization algorithm. International Journal of Communication Systems. 2021;34(5):4746–4746. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Konjaang JK, Xu L. Multi-objective workflow optimization strategy (MOWOS) for cloud computing. Journal of Cloud Computing. 2021;10(1):1–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mubeen A, Ibrahim M, BibiN, Baz M, Hamam H, Cheikhrouhou O. Alts An Adaptive Load Balanced Task Scheduling Approach for Cloud Computing. Processes. 2021;9(9):1514–1514. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Zhou X, Zhang G, SunJ, Zhou J, Wei T, Hu S. Minimizing cost and making pan for workflow scheduling in the cloud using fuzzy dominance sort- based HEFT. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2019;93:278–289. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.10.046. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Zhou J, Wang T, Cong P, Lu P, Wei T, Chen M. Cost and makes pan-aware workflow scheduling in hybrid clouds. Journal of Systems Architecture. 2019;100:101631–101631. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Xie G, Zeng G, Li R, Li K. Energy-Aware Processor Merging Algorithms for Deadline Constrained Parallel Applications in Heterogeneous Cloud Computing. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing. 2017;2(2):62–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Li Z, Ge J, Hu H, Song W, Hu H, Luo B. Cost and Energy Aware Scheduling Algorithm for Scientific Workflows with Deadline Constraint in Clouds. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing. 2018;11(4):713– 726. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tsc.2015.2466545. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Wen Y , Wang Z, Zhang Y, Liu J, Cao B, Chen J. Energy and cost aware scheduling with batch processing for instance-intensive IoT workflows in clouds. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2019;101:39–50. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.05.046. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Garg R, Mittal M, Son LH. Reliability and energy efficient workflow scheduling in cloud environment. ClusterComputing.2019;22(4):1283–1297. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10586-019-02911-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Chunlin L, Jianhang T, Youlong L. Hybrid Cloud Adaptive Scheduling Strategy for Heterogeneous Workloads. Journal of Grid Computing.2019;17(3):419 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. 446. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10723-019-09481-3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Li C, Tang J ,Luo Y. Cost-aware scheduling for ensuring software performance and reliability under heterogeneous workloads of hybrid cloud. Automated Software Engineering. 2019;26(1):125–159. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10515-019-00252-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Zhu Z, Zhang G, Li M, Liu X. Evolutionary Multi- Objective Workflow Scheduling in Cloud. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems. 2016;27(5):1344–1357 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rehman A, Hussain SS, Rehman Z, Zia S, Shamshirband S. Multi-objective approach of energy efficient workflow scheduling in cloud environments. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience. 2019;31(8):e4949–e4949. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sardaraz M, Tahir M. A parallel multi-objective genetic algorithm for scheduling scientific workflows in cloud computing. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Bertsekas DP. Feature-based aggregation and deep reinforcement learning: a survey and some new implementations. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica. 2019;6(1):1–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Xue L, Sun C, Wunsch D, Zhou Y, Yu F. An adaptive strategy via reinforcement learning for the prisoner dilemma game. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica. Switzerland. Springer. 2018;p. 550–559. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wang H, Huang T, Liao X, Abu-Rub H, Chen G. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Reinforcement Learning for Constrained Energy Trading Games With Incomplete Information. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. 2017;47(10):3404–3416. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Duan R, Prodan R, Li X. Multi-Objective Game Theoretic Scheduling of Bag-of-Tasks Workflows on Hybrid Clouds. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing. 2014;2(1):29–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Cui D, Ke W, Peng Z, Zuo J. Multiple DAGs workflow scheduling algorithm based on reinforcement learning in cloud computing. In: Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Systems. Singapore. Springer. 2016;p. 305– 311. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Iranpour E, Sharifian S. A distributed load balancing [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. and admission control algorithm based on Fuzzy type-2 and Game theory for large-scale SaaS cloud architectures. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2018;86:81–98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Jiahao W, Zhiping P, Delong C, Qirui L, Jieguang H. A multi object optimization cloud workflow scheduling algorithm based on reinforcement learning. In: Intelligent Computing Theories and Application; vol. Cham, Switzerland. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Gill SS, Chana I, Singh M, Buyya R. RADAR: Self- configuring and self-healing in resource management for enhancing quality of cloud services. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience. 2019;31(1):e4834–e4834. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Abdulhamid SM, Latiff MSA, Abdul-Salaam G, Madni SHH. Secure Scientific Applications Scheduling Technique for Cloud Computing Environment Using Global League Championship Algorithm. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(7):e0158102–e0158102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Lu Y, Sun N. An effective task scheduling algorithm based on dynamic energy management and efficient resource utilization in green cloud computing environment. Cluster Computing. 2019;22(S1):513– 520. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Singh H, Bhasin A, Kaveri P R. QRAS efficient resource allocation for task scheduling in cloud computing. SN Applied Sciences. 2021;3(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Lis A, Sudolska A, Pietryka I, Kozakiewicz A. Cloud Computing and Energy Efficiency: Mapping the Thematic Structure of Research. Energies. 2020;13(16):4117–4117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.