00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Ultrasound & Elastography in the Diagnosis of Endometriosis & Adenomyosis-Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound with Elastography Vs. Mri in Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis and Adenomyosis

Authors

Dr. Nabin Kumar Yadav

Navoi State University (Department of Surgery, Radiology and Obstetrics & Gynecology) (IN)

Dr. Gayatri Prasad Sharma

Navoi State University(Department of Surgery, Radiology and Obstetrics & Gynecology) (IN)

Dr. Bibha Yadav

Navoi State University(Department of Surgery, Radiology and Obstetrics & Gynecology) (IN)

Dr. Reshmi Padmanaban

Navoi State University(Department of Surgery, Radiology and Obstetrics & Gynecology) (IN)

Aditya

Navoi State University(Department of Surgery, Radiology and Obstetrics & Gynecology) (IN)

Yashika

Navoi State University(Department of Surgery, Radiology and Obstetrics & Gynecology) (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.140500108

Subject Category: health

Volume/Issue: 14/5 | Page No: 1022-1025

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-06-27

Published: 2025-06-26

Abstract

Abstract: Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) and adenomyosis are common causes of pelvic pain and infertility. Accurate preoperative diagnosis is critical for management. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), increasingly augmented with elastography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the leading noninvasive modalities.

Keywords

Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS),, Elastography,, Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE),, Adenomyosis,, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),, Diagnostic accuracy,, Pelvic pain, Infertility, Strain elastography, Noninvasive imaging, Sensitivity, Specificity, MUSA criteria, Junctional zone,, Uterine imaging.

Downloads

References

1. Chapron C, Marcellin L, Borghese B, Santulli P. Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019;15(11):666-82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Guerriero S, Pascual MA, Ajossa S, et al. Deep infiltrating endometriosis: comparison between 2D/3D transvaginal ultrasound and MRI. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2025;106(2):194-201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Hudelist G, Fritzer N, Thomas A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for non-invasive diagnosis of bowel endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;55(4):393-401. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1244-56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bazot M, Daraï E. Diagnosis of deep endometriosis: clinical examination, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and other imaging techniques. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(4):886-94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Van den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone FP, et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(3):284-98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Grasso RF, Di Grezia G, Sizzi O, et al. Diagnosis of adenomyosis: transvaginal sonography combined with elastography versus magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;61(2):140-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Leonardi M, Espada M, Khoo SK, et al. Imaging diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;61(2):1447-53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Takeuchi H, Kuwatsuru R, Kitade M, et al. A feasibility study of transvaginal strain elastography for diagnosing deep endometriosis. J Ultrasound Med. 2024;43(2):332-40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kinkel K, Frei KA, Balleyguier C, Chapron C. Diagnosis of endometriosis with imaging: a review. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(2):580-93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Stoelinga B, Hehenkamp WJ, Brölmann HA, Huirne JA. Real-time elastography for the evaluation of adenomyosis: a prospective pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;61(4):554-62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bazot M, Daraï E. Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(4):606-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Shaikh S, Hassan L, Tareen F, Tauseef H. Comparative evaluation of transvaginal ultrasound and MRI in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2023;49(1):316-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sharma P, Sharma R, Aggarwal A, et al. Comparative evaluation of 2D TVUS and MRI in the diagnosis of adenomyosis and fibroids: A systematic review. Eur J Radiol. 2023;156:110576. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Gordts S, Brosens JJ, Fusi L, Benagiano G, Brosens I. Uterine adenomyosis: a need for uniform terminology and consensus classification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;44(4):598-607. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Bazot M, Daraï E. Role of MRI in the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis and adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;71:90-102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.