00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Response of Several Types of Manure And Dosages on Cabbage (Brassica Oleracea L.) Growth and Yield

Authors

Siska Arie Santy Siahaan

Department of Agrotechnology Study, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Simalungun, Jalan Sisingamangaraja Barat, Kel. Bah Kapul, Kota Pematangsiantar, 21142, North Sumatra, Indonesia (ID)

Linda Reni Purba

Department of Agribusiness Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Simalungun, Jalan Sisingamangaraja Barat, Kel. Bah Kapul, Kota Pematangsiantar, 21142, North Sumatra, Indonesia (ID)

Yontra Erikson Pandapotan Haloho

Department of Agrotechnology Study, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Simalungun, Jalan Sisingamangaraja Barat, Kel. Bah Kapul, Kota Pematangsiantar, 21142, North Sumatra, Indonesia (ID)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1411000017

Subject Category: Agriculture

Volume/Issue: 14/11 | Page No: 178-184

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-02

Published: 2025-12-02

Abstract

This research was conducted in Tiga Runggu, Simalungun Regency, Indonesia. This research was conducted using a factorial randomized block design consisting of two factors, i.e. application of manure types consisting of 3 treatments, namely J1: chicken manure, J2: cow manure and J3: buffalo manure. The second factor consisted of three treatments, namely: D1: 75g/plant, D2: 100g/plant, and D3: 125g/plant. The parameters observed in this study were: (a) rate of crop formation, (b) gross crop weight per sample plant, (c) net crop weight per sample plant, (d) gross crop weight per plot, and (e) net crop weight per plot. The results of the study showed that the type of manure treatment had a significant effect on the rate of crop formation, gross crop weight per sample plant, net crop weight per sample plant, gross crop weight per plot and net crop weight per plot.

Keywords

organic fertilizer, plant development, yield

Downloads

References

1. Adekiya AO, Ojeniyi SO. 2002. Evaluation of tomato growth and soil properties under methods of seedling bed preparation in an alfisol in the rainforest zone of Southwest Nigeria. Soil and Tillage Research 64: 275-279. https://doi.org.10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00232-X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adeyemo AJ, Akingbola OO, Ojeniyi SO. 2019. Effects of poultry manure on soil infiltration, organic matter contents and maize performance on two contrasting degraded alfisols in southwestern Nigeria. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture (1): 573-580. https://doi.org.10.1007/s40093-019-0273-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Afriyie E, Mensah E, Lohri CL. 2013. Comparative study of composted and uncomposted digestated chicken manure and cow dung as fertilizers and their effects on soil properties. Global Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology Vol 2(4): 12-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Agbede TM, Ojeniyi SO. 2009. Tillage and poultry manure effects on soil fertility and sorghum yield in southwestern Nigeria. Soil and Tillage Research 104: 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2008.12.014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cahyono B. 2003.Teknik dan Strategi Budidaya Kubis. Kanisius .Yogyakarta [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Damanik MMB, Bachtiar EH, Fauzi. 2011. Kesuburan Tanah dan Pemupukan. USU Press. Medan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Duyar H, Tuzel Y, Kılıç OG. 2009. Effects of green manure on organic vegetable production in the greenhouse. Acta Horticulturae 807: 365-370. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.807.51 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hadisuwito, S, 2007. Membuat Pupuk Kompos Cair. Agro Media Pustaka. Jakarta [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Khalid AA, Tuffour HO, Bonsu M, Parker BQ. 2014. Effects of poultry manure and NPK fertilizer on physical properties of a sandy soil in Ghana. International Journal of Scientific Research in Agricultural Sciences 1: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.12983/ijsras-2014-p0001-0005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lingga P, Marsono. 2013. Petunjuk Penggunaan Pupuk. Cetakan I. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Marinari S, Masciandro G, Ceccanti B, Grego S. 2000. Influence or organic and mineral fertilizers on soil biological and physical properties. Bioresource Technology 72: 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00094-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Masarirambi M, Oseni T, Wahome P.K, 2012. Effects of Kraal Manure, Chicken Manure and Inorganic Fertilizer on Growth and Yield of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var Commander) in a Semi-arid Environment. Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Polat E, Sönmez S, Demir H, Kaplan M, 2001. The Effects of Different Organic Fertilizer Applications on Yield, Quality and Plant Nutrient Uptake in Lettuce, Turkey 2nd Ecological Agriculture Symposium. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sutedjo M. 2010. Pupuk dan Cara Pemupukan. Cetakan 8. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Widowati. 2004. Pengaruh Kompos Pupuk Organik Yang Dipekaya Dengan Bahan Mineral dan Pupuk Hayati Terhadap Sifat-Sifat Tanah, Serapan Hara dan Produksi Sayuran Organik. Laporan Proyek Penelitian Program Pengembangan Agribisnis. Balai Penelitian Tanah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.