00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

“The Role of Institutional Innovation Council in Enhancing Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Higher Education”

Authors

Pradeep Kumar C R

Assistant professor, Dept. of Commerce, Swami Vivekananda Rural First Grade College Chandapura. Bangalore-560091 (IN)

Vidya R

Assistant professor, Dept. of Commerce, Swami Vivekananda Rural First Grade College Chandapura. Bangalore-560091 (IN)

Pavithra N

Assistant professor, Dept. of Commerce, Swami Vivekananda Rural First Grade College Chandapura. Bangalore-560091 (IN)

Chandan K M

Assistant professor, Dept. of Commerce, Swami Vivekananda Rural First Grade College Chandapura. Bangalore-560091 (IN)

Arman Shaikh R

Assistant professor, Dept. of Commerce, Swami Vivekananda Rural First Grade College Chandapura. Bangalore-560091 (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1412000086

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 14/12 | Page No: 968-976

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-07

Published: 2026-01-07

Abstract

Institutional Innovation Councils (IICs), initiated under the aegis of the Ministry of Education, Government of India, have emerged as a significant mechanism for fostering a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship in higher education institutions. The primary objective of IICs is to systematically nurture innovative thinking, problem-solving abilities, and entrepreneurial skills among students and faculty members. This study examines the role of Institutional Innovation Councils in enhancing innovation and entrepreneurship within higher education institutions by promoting start-up ecosystems, industry–academia collaboration, capacity-building programs, and experiential learning opportunities. Using a structured research framework, the study analyzes the effectiveness of IIC initiatives such as innovation challenges, entrepreneurship development programs, incubation support, and intellectual property awareness. The findings highlight that IICs play a pivotal role in strengthening innovation culture, improving entrepreneurial intent among students, and aligning academic institutions with national innovation goals. The study concludes that effective implementation of IIC activities significantly contributes to institutional transformation, skill development, and sustainable entrepreneurial outcomes in higher education.

Keywords

Institutional Innovation Council, Higher Education, Innovation Ecosystem, Entrepreneurship Development, Start-ups, Skill Development, Industry–Academia Collaboration

Downloads

References

1. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Fayolle, A., & Gailly, B. (2015). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial attitudes and intention: Hysteresis and persistence. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 75–93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Guerrero, M., Cunningham, J. A., & Urbano, D. (2016). Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: An exploratory study of the United Kingdom. Research Policy, 44(3), 748–764. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Liñán, F., & Fayolle, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: Citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 907–933. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Nabi, G., Liñán, F., Fayolle, A., Krueger, N., & Walmsley, A. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(2), 277–299. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ministry of Education, Government of India. (2020). National Innovation and Startup Policy (NISP) for Students and Faculty. New Delhi: Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE). (2018). Institutional Innovation Council (IIC) Guidelines. New Delhi: AICTE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2020). Intellectual property and education. Geneva: WIPO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, R. (2001). What’s new about the new economy? Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 267–315. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. OECD. (2019). University–industry collaboration: New evidence and policy options. Paris: OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.