“The Role of Institutional Innovation Council in Enhancing Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Higher Education”
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Institutional Innovation Councils (IICs), initiated under the aegis of the Ministry of Education, Government of India, have emerged as a significant mechanism for fostering a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship in higher education institutions. The primary objective of IICs is to systematically nurture innovative thinking, problem-solving abilities, and entrepreneurial skills among students and faculty members. This study examines the role of Institutional Innovation Councils in enhancing innovation and entrepreneurship within higher education institutions by promoting start-up ecosystems, industry–academia collaboration, capacity-building programs, and experiential learning opportunities. Using a structured research framework, the study analyzes the effectiveness of IIC initiatives such as innovation challenges, entrepreneurship development programs, incubation support, and intellectual property awareness. The findings highlight that IICs play a pivotal role in strengthening innovation culture, improving entrepreneurial intent among students, and aligning academic institutions with national innovation goals. The study concludes that effective implementation of IIC activities significantly contributes to institutional transformation, skill development, and sustainable entrepreneurial outcomes in higher education.
Downloads
References
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
Fayolle, A., & Gailly, B. (2015). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial attitudes and intention: Hysteresis and persistence. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 75–93.
Guerrero, M., Cunningham, J. A., & Urbano, D. (2016). Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: An exploratory study of the United Kingdom. Research Policy, 44(3), 748–764.
Liñán, F., & Fayolle, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: Citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 907–933.
Nabi, G., Liñán, F., Fayolle, A., Krueger, N., & Walmsley, A. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(2), 277–299.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.
Ministry of Education, Government of India. (2020). National Innovation and Startup Policy (NISP) for Students and Faculty. New Delhi: Government of India.
All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE). (2018). Institutional Innovation Council (IIC) Guidelines. New Delhi: AICTE.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2020). Intellectual property and education. Geneva: WIPO.
Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, R. (2001). What’s new about the new economy? Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 267–315.
OECD. (2019). University–industry collaboration: New evidence and policy options. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in our journal are licensed under CC-BY 4.0, which permits authors to retain copyright of their work. This license allows for unrestricted use, sharing, and reproduction of the articles, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors and the source.