Local–Hybrid Web-Based Voter Education Awareness Campaign Platform

Voter education plays a significant role in promoting informed and responsible participation in democratic processes; however, many local communities face challenges in accessing reliable and structured voter education resources due to limited internet connectivity and reliance on informal information channels. This study presents a local–hybrid web-based voter education awareness platform designed to deliver accessible, multimedia-driven educational content for community use by integrating locally hosted infrastructure with cloud-mediated access services, enabling both local control and remote accessibility. The platform was developed using an iterative–incremental methodology and evaluated based on the ISO/IEC 25010 Software Product Quality Model. Evaluation results indicate that the system achieved high performance across key quality characteristics, including functional suitability, usability, performance efficiency, security, and maintainability. The findings demonstrate that hybrid deployment models can effectively address accessibility constraints while maintaining system quality and reliability, thereby offering a scalable and practical approach for delivering voter education in resource-constrained community environments.

Voter education, Web-based systems, Hybrid deployment, Software quality, ISO/IEC 25010, Community platforms

1. Anggraeni, L., Tanshzil, S. W., Paramitha, S. T., Putra, T. F., Azis, A., Firdaus, P., & Jermaina, N. (2025). Electhink (election education and critical thinking) for strengthening civic engagement among Generation Z. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología, 5, 2285. https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20252285 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bastardo, R., Pavão, J., & Rocha, N. P. (2024). Methodological quality of usability evaluation of digital applications to promote citizens’ engagement and participation. Digital, 4(3), 740–761. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital4030038 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Benlahcene, A. (2024). Citizens’ e-participation through e-government services: Opportunities and challenges. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2415526. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2415526 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bennett, W. L. (2008). Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cadayday, B. A. R., Jimenez, D. M., & Boiser, S. M. (2024). Role of social media in the political landscape and voting decisions of Gen Zs in the Philippines. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(11), 720–730. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8120059 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Carvallo, J. P., & Franch, X. (2019). Managing non-functional requirements for software architectures: An ISO/IEC 25010-based approach. Information and Software Technology, 116, 106213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2019.106213 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Diepeveen, S., & Pinet, M. (2022). User perspectives on digital literacy as a response to misinformation. Development Policy Review, 40(S2). https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12671 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ferrag, M. A., Shu, L., Yang, X., Derhab, A., & Maglaras, L. (2020). Security and privacy for green IoT-based agriculture: Review, blockchain solutions, and challenges. IEEE Access, 8, 32031–32053. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2973178 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gill, S. S., Wu, H., Patros, P., Ottaviani, C., Arora, P., Pujol, V. C., Haunschild, D., Parlikad, A. K., Cetinkaya, O., Lutfiyya, H., Stankovski, V., Li, R., Ding, Y., Qadir, J., Abraham, A., Ghosh, S. K., Song, H. H., Sakellariou, R., Rana, O., ... Buyya, R. (2024). Modern computing: Vision and challenges. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 13, 100116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2024.100116 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gomes Velasco, N. Y., Rodríguez Gutierrez, J. K., & Chaviano, O. G. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of Web 2.0 in election campaigns. Heliyon, 10, e40337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40337 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hussain, A., & Mkpojiogu, E. O. (2015). An application of the ISO/IEC 25010 standard in the quality-in-use assessment of an online health awareness system. Jurnal Teknologi, 77(5). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6107 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kertysova, K. (2018). Artificial intelligence and disinformation. Security and Human Rights, 29(1–4), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1163/18750230-02901005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Moumane, K., Idri, A., & Abran, A. (2016). Usability evaluation of mobile applications using ISO 9241 and ISO 25062 standards. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 548. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2171-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Pasaribu, J. S., & Argadikusuma, I. S. (2024). Design and testing of a web-based student information management system. International Journal of Engineering Science and Information Technology, 4(4), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.52088/ijesty.v4i4.594 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Permana, R., & Alkadri, S. P. A. (2025). Development of a web-based thesis repository for information technology education students. Journal of Multidiscipline and Collaboration Research, 2(2), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.58740/jmcr.v2i2.625 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Shin, B., Lee, J., & Park, Y. (2024). Digital tools for citizen participation: A systematic analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), 101954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101954 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Sanders, C. K., & Scanlon, E. (2021). The Digital Divide Is a Human Rights Issue: Advancing Social Inclusion Through Social Work Advocacy. Journal of human rights and social work, 6(2), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-020-00147-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Suttmann-Lea, M. (2023). The impact of voter education on voter confidence. Election Law Journal, 22(3), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2022.0055 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Tigno, J. V. (2023). Making voter education a pillar of democracy in the Philippines (UP CIDS Policy Brief 2023–02). UP Center for Integrative and Development Studies. https://cids.up.edu.ph/policy-brief/making-voter-education-pillar-democracy-philippines/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. United Nations Development Programme. (2025). A matter of choice: People and possibilities in the age of AI (Human Development Report 2025). https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/global-report-document/hdr2025reporten.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Velasco, N. Y. G., Rodríguez Gutierrez, J. K., & Chaviano, O. G. (2024). Research trends in digital citizenship: Bibliometric mapping from Web of Science. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i12.8492 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Zhang, Q., Cheng, L., & Boutaba, R. (2010). Cloud computing: State-of-the-art and research challenges. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 1(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13174-010-0007-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Performance Analysis of Silicon PV Array Using Infrared Thermography and Detecting Temperature Non-Uniformities
• Dynamic Capabilities and Digital Transformation Performance: The Role of Organizational Agility in the Public Sector
• Comparative Effectiveness of Neural Mobilization Versus Positional Release Technique in Cervical Radiculopathy – An Experimental Study
• Soil Moisture Mapping of Solano Nueva Vizcaya: A Comparison and Review
• Silent Assistance for Emergencies (SAFE): A Mobile-Based Emergency Reporting Application for the Deaf and Mute Community