Reverse Logistics, Regulatory Environment and Supply Chain Efficiency in Kenyas Remanufacturing Sector: A Meta Analysis

The paper undertakes a Meta-analysis on research done on the topic of reverse logistics and the effect it bears on the Kenyan remanufacturing sector, while considering the moderating effect of the regulatory environment as a result of limited adoption of the practice and studies undertaken on the area of interest. The study is pegged on the resource-based view that puts emphasis on the capabilities of the firms in reverse logistics and transport cost economics, which explains the challenges in governance of return networks. The paper reviews literature systematically through a meta-analysis methodology following the PRISMA guidelines, where articles are searched in prestigious academic databases. The research obtained 80 articles from SAGE, Science Direct, and Wiley between periods of 2020 and 2026. Duplicates and publications that were not based on reverse logistics, not empirically undertaken, and publications from predatory journals were eliminated, leaving 30 that were further subjected to the inclusion criteria, leaving 14 peer-reviewed articles whose empirical and theoretical findings were used to evaluate the effect of reverse logistics on the efficiency of Kenyans' remanufacturing supply chain. The study adopted the Hunter-Schmidt method to synthesize correlation coefficients from multiple studies. The findings of the study support the theoretical framework that links reverse logistics and supply chain efficiency in the remanufacturing sector on average (r=0.42) globally,   in developed countries (r) =0.60, In Kenya, the r coefficient is below 0.42, showing a weak correlation, as infrastructure and the informal sector dominance, limits the adoption of reverse logistics from reaching its preferred potential. The moderation analysis determined that the regulatory environment, in terms of policy regulations and laws (average r of 0.51), moderates the relationship between reverse logistics and supply chain efficiency. The studies imply the existence of a need for the adoption of strategic regulations that target policy coherence, the incorporation of technology, and alignment of the stakeholders to enhance significant efficiency gains. The findings enrich and confirm the theoretical discourse on the manner in which the business environment interacts with the constructs of reverse logistics to drive efficiency in remanufacturing sector supply chains.

efficiency, reverse logistics, circular economy, remanufacturing, Regulatory environment

1. Adesoga, T. O., Olaiya, O. P., Onuma, E. P., Ajayi, O. O., & Olagunju, O. D. (2024). Review of reverse logistics practices and their impact on supply chain sustainability. International journal of scientific research and advances, 12(2), 45-55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aming’a, M., Annan, J., & Marwanga, R. (2025). Manufacturers’ adoption of circularity science in supply chains and its perceived viability to promote sustainable performance: Qualitative-empirical evidence from Kenya. Sustainable Environment, 11(1), 2454751. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Andrejić, M., & Pajić, V. (2024). Strategies for effective logistics outsourcing: A case study in the Serbian market. J. Organ. Technol. Entrep, 2(1), 14-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Attari, M. Y. N., Ala, A., Ahmadi, M., & Jami, E. N. (2024). A highly effective optimization approach for managing reverse warehouse system capacity across diverse scenarios. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 8(2), 455-471. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Awino, D. (2025). Challenges and opportunities for green transitions adoption in Kenya's textile manufacturing industry. Frontiers in Sustainability, 6, 1527365. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Baglio, M., Colicchia, C., Creazza, A., & Dallari, F. (2025). The importance of warehouses in logistics outsourcing: benchmarking the perspectives of 3PL providers and shippers. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 32(1), 1-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Barzel, Y., & Allen, D. W. (2023). Economic analysis of property rights. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Benmebarek, A., Hami, N., & Hashim, R. (2025). The Moderating Effect of Regulatory Pressure on the Relationship between Sustainable Supply Chain Practices and Performance: Evidence from Algerian Oil and Gas Companies. PaperASIA, 41(1b), 409-423. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Calignano, F., & Mercurio, V. (2023). An overview of the impact of additive manufacturing on supply chain, reshoring, and sustainability. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 7, 100103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chatzoudes, D., Kadłubek, M., & Maditinos, D. (2024). Green logistics practices: The antecedents and effects for supply chain management in the modern era. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 19(3), 991-1034. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chekoubi, Z., Trabelsi, W., Sauer, N., & Majdouline, I. (2022). The integrated production-inventory-routing problem with reverse logistics and remanufacturing: a two-phase decomposition heuristic. Sustainability, 14(20), 13563. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Flemming, K., & Noyes, J. (2021). Qualitative evidence synthesis: where are we at?. International journal of qualitative methods, 20, 1609406921993276. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Forkan, M., Rizvi, M. M., & Chowdhury, M. A. M. (2022). Multiobjective reverse logistics model for inventory management with environmental impacts: An application in industry. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 14, 200078. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ho, H. W. L., Haaker, T., & Yishake, M. (2025). Barriers and opportunities when transitioning from linear to circular business models: Evidence from the construction and manufacturing sectors in the Netherlands. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 5(3), 1865-1886. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hosain, M. S., & Mustafi, M. A. A. (2025). Linking green supply chain management practices with perceived environmental performance: A mediated moderation model. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(2), 1879-1900. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jain, K., Makholia, D., Mishra, R., Kumar, A., Kashyap, R. C., Bhagat, N., & Padiyar, S. V. S. (2023). Review on green inventory model and reverse logistic. Eur. Chem. Bull, 12(10), 4254-4267. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Jalapathy, P., & Unnissa, M. M. (2024). Extended warranty and retailing strategies in CLSC competition with (Re) manufacturing manufacturer. IEEE Access, 12, 119697-119732. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kamanga, F. N. (2024). Reverse logistics practices and the performance of large manufacturing firms in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, JKUAT-COHRED). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Khan, H., & Khan, K. I. A. (2026). Performance evaluation of reverse logistics maturity level and its influence on construction sustainability and C&D waste reduction: insights from Pakistan’s construction sector. Smart Construction and Sustainable Cities, 4(1), 2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Khomaziuk, S., & Gerasymchuk, T. V. (2024). How effectively reduce transportation costs. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kiraithe, M. N., Muthama, J. N., Kaingu, C., & Mathiu, P. M. (2024). Evaluation Of The Impact Of Anthropogenic Activities On Sustainable Use Of Medicinal Biodiversity In Realization Of Kenya’s Vision 2030 Agenda For Sustainable Development. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 8(3), 1-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kumar, R. A., Vipin, B., & Sridharan, R. (2026). Sustainable reverse logistics network design: a case of waste electrical and electronic equipment management. International Transactions in Operational Research, 33(4), 2577-2604. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Le, T. N., Phan, Q. H., Nguyen, P. H., & Nguyen, L. A. T. (2025). Rethinking reverse logistics: Neutrosophic strategies for warehouse management challenges. Neutrosophic sets and systems, 81(1), 7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Li, H., Tian, Y., Li, Z., Wu, C., & Liu, Y. (2023). Life-cycle economic and environmental impacts of municipal solid waste reverse logistics in residential areas. Waste Management, 164, 200-208. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Li, Y., Kannan, D., Jha, P. C., Garg, K., Darbari, J., & Agarwal, N. (2023). Design of a multi echelon product recovery embeded reverse logistics network for multi products and multi periods. Annals of Operations Research, 323(1), 131-152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. LUMWAJI, A. E. (2024). REVERSE LOGISTICS PRACTICES AND SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE OF MOTOR VEHICLE ASSEMBLERS IN KENYA (Doctoral dissertation). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Macedo, H., Tomaz, L., Guimarães, L., Cerqueira-Pinto, L., Sá, J. C., & Dinis-Carvalho, J. (2025). Development of a classification model for value-added and non-value-added operations in retail logistics: insights from a supermarket case study. Sustainability, 17(7), 3177. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mailani, D., Hulu, M. Z. T., Simamora, M. R., & Kesuma, S. A. (2024). Resource-based view theory to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage of the firm: Systematic literature review. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Studies, 4(1), 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Malhotra, G., Dandotiya, G., Shaiwalini, S., Khan, A., & Homechaudhuri, S. (2025). Benchmarking for organisational competitiveness: a resource-based view perspective. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 32(3), 943-964. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Mandal, J., & Mohammed, I. A. (2024). Implementation of AI transportation routing in reverse logistics to reduce CO2 footprint. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(5), 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Masese, M. E., & Gatari, C. (2025). Reverse logistics and sustainable performance of agricultural value chain organizations in Kisii County, Kenya. International Academic Journal of Procurement and Supply Chain Management, 3 (2), 484, 497, 2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Mbago, M., Mkansi, M., Ntayi, J. M., Namagembe, S., Tukamuhabwa, B., & Mwelu, N. (2025). The role of reverse supply network in enhancing reverse logistics implementation in a developing country context: does the adoption of innovative technologies matter?. Journal of Responsible Production and Consumption, 2(1), 612-637. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Miao, Q., & Nduneseokwu, C. (2025). Environmental leadership in private organizations. In Environmental leadership in a VUCA Era: An interdisciplinary handbook (pp. 317-398). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Mo, D. Y., Ma, C. Y., Ho, D. C., & Wang, Y. (2022). Design of a reverse logistics system with internet of things for service parts management. Sustainability, 14(19), 12013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Ogutu, H., Adol, G. F. C., Bujdosó, Z., Andrea, B., Fekete-Farkas, M., & Dávid, L. D. (2023). Theoretical nexus of knowledge management and tourism business enterprise competitiveness: An integrated overview. Sustainability, 15(3), 1948. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Olonde, J. O., Oguge, N., & Kituku, W. (2025). Environmental Rule of Law: Analysis of Kenya’s Capacity Building Provisions in Climate Change Legal Regimes. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Qin, Z. (2022). The inventory control system of reverse logistics for E-Commerce packaging recovery based on BP neural network. International Journal of Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing, 16, 413-425. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Richter, K., & Dobos, I. (2004). Production-inventory control in an EOQ-type reverse logistics system. In Supply chain management and reverse logistics (pp. 139-160). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Shabur, M. A. (2024). A comprehensive review on the impact of Industry 4.0 on the development of a sustainable environment. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), 97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Singh, A., Goel, A., Chauhan, A., & Singh, S. K. (2025). Sustainability of electronic product manufacturing through e-waste management and reverse logistics. Sustainable Futures, 9, 100490. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Singh, S. R., Gaur, A., Singh, D., & Padiyar, S. S. (2025). Optimal policy for manufacturer-retailer having two warehouse storage supply chain models with reverse logistics under carbon tax policy. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 9(3), 939-953. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Syed, T. A., Mehmood, F., & Qaiser, T. (2023). Brand–SMI collaboration in influencer marketing campaigns: A transaction cost economics perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 192, 122580. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Tang, H., & Thelkar, A. R. (2023). A fuzzy mathematical model for hybrid inventory and purchase optimization in a reverse logistics system considering shortage and warehouse capacity. Science Progress, 106(4), 00368504231201797.. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Tang, H., & Thelkar, A. R. (2023). A fuzzy mathematical model for hybrid inventory and purchase optimization in a reverse logistics system considering shortage and warehouse capacity. Science Progress, 106(4), 00368504231201797. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Tetteh, F. K., Kwateng, K. O., Tukue, T., & Mensah, J. (2025). Green supply chain management practices: review, framework and future research directions. Journal of Responsible Production and Consumption, 2(1), 112-150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Thakkar, H., & Agarwal, P. (2026). Enhancing efficiency through negotiation and minimizing transaction costs: application of Coase theorem to corporate insolvency. International Journal of Law and Management, 68(2), 201-219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Thibbotuwawa, A., Nanayakkara, P. R., Fernando, W. M., Jayalath, M. M., Perera, H. N., & Nielsen, P. (2023). A reverse logistics network model for handling e-commerce returns. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 56(2), 138-143. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Troisi, R., & Alfano, G. (2023). Proximity and inter-firm corruption: A transaction cost approach. Small Business Economics, 60(3), 1105-1120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Vivona, R., Demircioglu, M. A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2023). The costs of collaborative innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 48(3), 873-899. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Wadhawan, I. B., & Rizvi, M. M. (2025). Optimizing inventory management through multiobjective reverse logistics with environmental impact. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 146, 116166. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Zarei, M., & Shahab, S. (2025). Nature-based solutions in urban green infrastructure: A systematic review of success factors and implementation challenges. Land, 14(4), 818. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Enhancing Formation Control of Multi Agent Systems Using Ann Based Technique
• Improving Sliding Mode Control with Chattering Reduction using Fuzzy Based Technique
• Cooking Quality, Fasting Blood Glucose, Glycemic Index and Load of High–Fiber Noodles Made from Wheat, Tiger Nut Residue and Cassava Flour Blends
• Matrix Rhythm Therapy Versus Interferential Therapy Combined with Lumbar Stabilization Exercises in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Comparative Trial
• Formulation and Sensory Evaluation of Functional Cake Prepared from Sweet Potato Powder