00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Experimental Evaluation of the Effect of Additive on Vegetable Oil-Based Lubricants

Authors

Olatunde Samuel Olanrewaju

Department of mechanical Engineering Federal University of Technology, Minna Niger, Nigeria (NG)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600042

Subject Category: Experimental Evaluation

Volume/Issue: 15/6 | Page No: 536-544

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-03

Published: 2026-07-02

Abstract

This study investigates the physicochemical  properties of vegetable oil-based lubricants derived from sesame and groundnut oils, with emphasis on the effect of a composite chemical additive. The additive formulation consisted of a fine mixture of aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃) and magnesium sulfate heptahydrate (MgSO₄·7H₂O) combined with hydrogen peroxide and oleum, applied at varying concentration levels (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% by volume). Key properties evaluated include kinematic viscosity, pour point, flash point, cloud point, specific gravity, thermal conductivity, acid value, free fatty acid, and saponification value, following established ASTM standards. Results indicate that increasing the additive concentration enhances the thermal conductivity of both oils, with sesame oil demonstrating superior thermal performance compared to groundnut oil. Conversely, groundnut oil exhibits better viscosity characteristics at higher additive concentrations, retaining greater lubricity, whereas sesame oil’s viscosity decreases with increasing additive levels. Both oils, however, exhibit declining thermal conductivity and lubricity at elevated temperatures (50–70°C), revealing a significant limitation for high-temperature industrial applications. Physicochemical analysis further confirms that groundnut oil has a higher flash point (265°C) and saponification value, while sesame oil presents a lower pour point (−14.67°C), indicating better cold-temperature performance. These findings suggest that optimizing composite additive formulations can significantly improve the performance of bio-lubricants; nonetheless, further research is required to address high-temperature stability before these lubricants can be adopted for broader industrial use.

Keywords

Additives; lubricants; Groundnut oil; Sesame oil; Thermal conductivity; Vegetable oil-based lubricants; Viscosity

Downloads

References

1. Kumar, P., & Chauhan, S. R. (2023). Recent advancements in nano-additives for biodegradable lubricants: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 177, 113179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113179 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ogunniyi, D. S. (2006). Castor oil: A vital industrial raw material. Bioresource Technology, 97(9), 1086–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.03.028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Rios, L. A., Lopez, D., Suarez, N., & Moreno, S. (2022). Vegetable oil-based lubricants: A sustainable approach to tribology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 334, 130189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130189 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Singh, Y., & Chauhan, S. R. (2021). Biodegradable lubricants from vegetable oils: A review of tribological performance. Tribology International, 156, 106821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2021.106821 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Song, J., Zhao, Y., Zhang, H., & Chen, X. (2019). Challenges and solutions in the application of vegetable oil-based lubricants. Lubricants, 7(10), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants7100085 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Stachowiak, G. W., & Batchelor, A. W. (2018). Engineering tribology (4th ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ulakpa, S. O. (2023). Assessment of pour point and other physicochemical properties of bio-lubricants derived from groundnut and sesame oils. Nigerian Journal of Engineering Research, 19(2), 102–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Zhang, J., & Wang, Q. (2021). Performance evaluation of additive-modified vegetable oils as industrial lubricants. Industrial Lubrication and Tribology, 73(4), 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILT-08-2020-0301 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. ASTM International. (2012). ASTM D97-12: Standard Test Method for Pour Point of Petroleum Products. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/D0097-12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. ASTM International. (2020). ASTM D93-20: Standard Test Methods for Flash Point by Pensky-Martens Closed Cup Tester. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/D0093-20 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. ASTM International. (2019). ASTM D1298-12b(2017): Standard Test Method for Density, Relative Density, or API Gravity of Crude Petroleum and Liquid Petroleum Products by Hydrometer Method. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/D1298 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. ASTM International. (2017). ASTM D2500-17a: Standard Test Method for Cloud Point of Petroleum Products and Liquid Fuels. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2500-17A [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. ASTM International. (2018). ASTM D664-18e2: Standard Test Method for Acid Number of Petroleum Products by Potentiometric Titration. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/D0664-18E02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.