“Systematic Review of the Toy Industry in India: Trends, Challenges, and Global Integration"
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Purpose: This study examines the intellectual evolution of the toy industry through a domain-based Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The review is guided by four research questions: (RQ1) What are the publication trends in toy-related research? (RQ2) What thematic clusters define the intellectual structure of the toy domain? (RQ3) How do policy and economic developments influence the evolution of the toy industry? and (RQ4) What future research directions emerge from existing literature?
Research Design: The review follows PRISMA 2020 guidelines and the SPAR-4-SLR protocol. Peer-reviewed articles were systematically retrieved from the Scopus database to capture historical developments and structural shifts within the toy industry. Bibliometric techniques were applied using Biblioshiny (R) and VOSviewer, including descriptive analysis, keyword co-occurrence mapping, cluster analysis, and factorial analysis (PCA).
Key Findings: The findings reveal a steady Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 6.65% in toy-related research. The literature is organized into ten thematic clusters, which merged together as three core areas such as; core toys, smart and digital toys and toy production & design, . Keywords related to data-driven technologies, such as deep learning, machine learning, and IoT, appear prominently, reflecting the growing integration of digital and analytical tools within toy research. Recent studies increasingly focus on wooden toys, smart toys, and technology-enabled play products.
Originality and Implications: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first domain-wide bibliometric review of the toy industry. The study offers a structured understanding of research trends and thematic evolution, providing useful insights for scholars, industry practitioners, and policymakers. The findings support evidence-based decision-making for innovation, policy formulation, and future academic inquiry in the toy sector. The findings will also help governments, startups to identify the core changes of the toy industry in recent years, which will help the government to make a policy framework; practitioners to identify new trends and clusters.
Downloads
References
"This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors."
Arvinder, S. (2000). China and the global economic slowdown. China Report, 38(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/000944550203800303
Bhatiya, M. (2016). Dragon vs. elephant: A comparative study of competitiveness of the toy industry of China and India. ZENITH International Journal of Business Economics & Research, 5(11).
Bhuwandee, R. S. (2016). Indian toy industry: Market analysis and recommendations. IIMB Management Review.
Directorate General of Foreign Trade, Ministry of Commerce and Industry. (2017). Amendment in policy condition No. 2 (iii) to chapter 95 of ITC (HS) 2017 Schedule 1 (Import policy). Government of India.
Economic Services Group, National Productivity Council. (2017). A research study on productivity and competitiveness of the toy manufacturing sector in India. National Productivity Council.
Hirshfelder, P. F. A. (1999). Toys with Indian imagery. In American stereotypes in the world of children (2nd ed., pp. 139–154). Scarecrow Press.
India Brand Equity Foundation. (n.d.). About Indian toys. Retrieved May 15, 2022, from https://www.ibef.org/indian-toys
ILO Consulting. (2021, May 30). An overview of Indian toy industry. https://www.iloconsulting.in/knowledge-center/an-overview-of-indian-toys-industry
Kumar, A. (2007). Lead and cadmium in soft plastic toys. Current Science, 93(6), 818–822.
Sandberg, A., & [Author initials needed], V. T. (2008). Dimensions of childhood play and toys. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education.
S. J. (2020). Parents’ responses to toys representing physical impairment. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 949–966. ⚠ Verify authors.
India Education Diary. (2021, February 22). Big on toys: Rajasthan government plans for the India Toy Fair. https://indiaeducationdiary.in/big-on-toys-rajasthan-government-plans-for-the-india-toy-fair/
Brandl, M. (2011). Children’s play and military toys today. Psychological Science and Education, (2), 26–29.
Bulsara, H. K., & [Author surname needed], S. G. (2009). Women entrepreneurship in India: A case study of Phoenix Soft Toys Creation. IIMA Institutional Repository, 111–120.
ASSOCHAM. (2013, August 8). Chinese toys trigger attrition in Indian SMEs: The Indian toy industry fighting for its survival. http://www.assocham.org/newsdetail.php?id=4125
ASSOCHAM. (2021, May 30). Chinese toys trigger attrition in Indian SMEs: The Indian toy industry fighting for its survival.
Crisman, J. D. (1996). Graspar: A flexible, easily controllable robotic hand. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 32–38.
Kwong, C. W., & [Author surname needed], S. M. (2021). Evaluation of the tactics for small- and medium-sized toy factories in China to deal with European and US toy safety requirements. International Journal of Engineering Business Management.
Gregori, D., et al. (2014). Food packaged with toys: An investigation of potential obesogenic effects in Indian children. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 81(1), 30–38.
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Toy. In Merriam-Webster dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/toy
Teik, D. O. L., & [Author initials needed], K. K. (2014). An exploratory study of the factors influencing Generation Y’s purchasing intention within the toy industry in Malaysia. Academy of World Business, Marketing and Management Development Conference Proceedings, 6(1), 176–188.
Dhar, S. (2020, September 2). India’s toy industry can’t meet domestic demand expectation. The Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/indias-toy-industry-cant-meet-domestic-demand-expectation/articleshow/77884539.cms
Business Standard. (2016, August 19). Differential duty structure a big challenge for toy industry: ASSOCHAM. https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-cm/differential-duty-structure-a-big-challenge-for-toy-industry-assocham-116081800234_1.html
Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade. (2020). DPIIT organises virtual conference on the National Action Plan for Toys (Newsletter No. 16).
Wood, E., Desmarais, S., & Gugula, S. (2002). The impact of parenting experience on gender stereotyped toy play of children. Sex Roles, 47(1–2), 39–49.
Singh, F. (2016). Wooden toys of Varanasi: Weakly developed isolated sector and shortages of income and employment opportunities. Arts and Social Sciences Journal, 7(3), 1–3.
The Economic Times. (2021, February 26). Foxconn of toy world to set up India’s first toy cluster in Karnataka. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/foxconn-of-toy-world-to-set-up-indias-first-toy-cluster-in-karnataka/articleshow/81230592.cms
Gálvez Martín, M. E. (1997). How to teach social science with toys. National Council for the Social Studies, Ohio State University.
George, A. (2013). The study of consumer behavior in the toys market of Kerala (Doctoral dissertation).
Dawson, G., & Galpert, L. (2008). Mothers’ use of imitative play for facilitating social responsiveness and toy play in young autistic children. Development and Psychopathology, 20(2).
Kumari, G., & Jayasree, K. (2004). Design development from Kondapalli toys. Textile Trends, 46(10), 23–27.
The Economic Times. (2023, February 1). Government hikes import duty on toys to 70%.
Ministry of Commerce and Industry. (2024). Government creates conducive manufacturing ecosystem for toy industry. https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2002099
Todd, B. K., Barry, J. A., & Thommessen, S. A. O. (2020). How large are gender differences in toy preferences? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior.
India Brand Equity Foundation. (2020). India’s toy story. https://www.ibef.org
Jain, P., & Singh, T. (2023). Teaching toy car to self-drive in a game environment using reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (pp. 948–956). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCAT59970.2023.10353463
Rangaswami, J., Kumar, T., & [Author surname needed], K. (2018). A comparative life cycle assessment of locally oriented small-scale toy industries: Traditional Channapatna toys vs. low-cost PVC toys made in China. Procedia CIRP, 487–492.
Gogan, J., & O’Leary, M. (2010). Aiming at a moving target: IT alignment in toy companies. In Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–13).
Jayan, A. P. (2018). A theoretical paper on research studies about the conventional toy industry. Research Journal of Management Sciences, 7(2), 6–9.
Goldbart, J., & Marshall, S. (2010). Play and toys in West Bengal: Self-reports of parents of children with cerebral palsy. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 47(4), 337–353.
Plessen, C. F. (2020). Humor styles and personality: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the relations between humor styles and the Big Five personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 154.
Reddy, S. (2021). Leaping forward: Favourable government policies to make India a toy manufacturing hub. Savills.
Rego, N. (2021, April 16). Clusters have wonderful and rare skills, says toy designer Natasha Khanna. .
Palmatier, R. W., Houston, M. B., & Hulland, J. (2018). Review articles: Purpose, process, and structure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1–5.
The Hindu. (2021, January 29). A look at the Indian toy industry as the National Toy Fair is set to begin next month.
Johnson, S., Nair, S., & Rao, S. (2011). Phthalates in toys available in Indian market. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology.
Siddiqui, S., & Farooque, A. (2019). Study of Indo-China trade with special reference to Chinese toys in Indian market. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 6(1), i51–i58.
Seiter, E. (2006). Toys are us: Marketing to children and parents. Cultural Studies. ⚠ Add volume/pages.
Shaheen, S. (2015). Cost optimization in electronic toys manufacturing and marketing: A viable alternative for women entrepreneurship (Doctoral thesis). Aligarh Muslim University.
Decharat, S. (2013). Assessment of lead in some children plastic toys. KKU Research Journal, 18(6).
Rana, S., & Sharma, K. (2016). A review on the state of methodological trends in international marketing literature. Journal of Global Business Advancement, 9(1), 90–107.
Misra, S., & Gupta, P. (2015). Toys and safety regulations. Consumer Education Monograph Series, 18.
Inc42. (2018, March 15). The 26 Rajasthan-based startups to look out for. https://inc42.com/features/the-26-rajasthan-based-startups-to-look-out-for/
The India Toy Fair. (2021). https://theindiatoyfair.in/
Ministry of Tourism. (2020). Toy story: Promotion of indigenous toys of India.
Toycathon. (2021). https://toycathon.mic.gov.in/
Dey, V., & Gupta, Y. (2021). Toyathon: Steps towards creating innovative Indian toy industry ecosystem. Indian Journal of Economics and Business, 20(3), 1505–1512.
Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade. (2020). Virtual conference on the action plan for toys.
Yadav, C. S. (2020). Incredible handmade in India toys on the brink of extinction. International Journal of Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity, 11(1), 561–571.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in our journal are licensed under CC-BY 4.0, which permits authors to retain copyright of their work. This license allows for unrestricted use, sharing, and reproduction of the articles, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors and the source.