00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Secure UPI for Web3: Integration of Solana with Unified Payments Interface

Authors

Rajendra Prasad Nayak

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, GCEK Bhawanipatna, Odisha, India (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600098

Subject Category: UPI

Volume/Issue: 15/6 | Page No: 1373-1386

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-09

Published: 2026-07-09

Abstract

To make the payment system robust and user friendly, decentralized based Scan and Pay system need to be designed. This paper integrates the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) of India with the Solana-based Blockchain to make the payment system decentralized. Solana offers a high throughput and low-cost based decentralized infrastructure which is combined with the simple and reliable UPI system. So, the proposed system enables cryptocurrency transactions linked to UPI while maintaining user friendliness, scalability, and regulatory compliance. The designed method uses a secure architecture powered by smart contracts and modular design. It offers a viable bridge between centralized financial networks and emerging Web3 ecosystems. Proposed Solana-based UPI is compared with the Non-Solana based UPI which is using Blockchain. Results show that there is improvement of 91% in transaction latency and 95% in transaction cost as compared to the Non-Solana based UPI system.

Keywords

UPI, Blockchain, Solana, Web3, Cryptocurrency, Digital Payments

Downloads

References

1. Alharby, M., & Van Moorsel, A. (2017). Blockchain-based smart contracts: A systematic mapping study. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.06372. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bhoi, A., Bhuyan, H. B., Nayak, R. P., Balabantaray, R. C., Pattanaik, A., & Chinmay, A. (2025). Smart crisis response leveraging social media content for effective disaster management. Discover Computing, 28(1), 1-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Buterin, V. (2014). A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. white paper, 3(37), 2-1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Conti, M., Kumar, E. S., Lal, C., & Ruj, S. (2018). A survey on security and privacy issues of bitcoin. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, 20(4), 3416-3452. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dinh, T. T. A., Wang, J., Chen, G., Liu, R., Ooi, B. C., & Tan, K. L. (2017). Blockbench: A framework for analyzing private Blockchains. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM international conference on management of data (pp. 1085-1100). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ferdous, M. S., Chowdhury, M. J. M., Hoque, M. A., & Colman, A. (2020). Blockchain consensus algorithms: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.07091. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Jena, K. K., Bhoi, S. K., Panda, S. K., & Nayak, R. P. (2025). A novel algorithm for consumer credibility estimation in cloud-internet of things systems. International Journal of Information Technology, 17(8), 4619-4629. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kosba, A., Miller, A., Shi, E., Wen, Z., & Papamanthou, C. (2016). Hawk: The Blockchain model of cryptography and privacy-preserving smart contracts. In 2016 IEEE symposium on security and privacy (SP) (pp. 839-858). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mettler, M. (2016). Blockchain technology in healthcare: The revolution starts here. In 2016 IEEE 18th international conference on e-health networking, applications and services (Healthcom) (pp. 1-3). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Nayak, R. P., Bhoi, S. K., & Bhoi, A. (2025). Blockchain-enabled dynamic toll collection in highway VANETs using distance and weight-based payment with local validation. Computer Networks, 111612. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Nayak, R. P., Bhoi, S. K., Sahoo, K. S., Sethi, S., Mohapatra, S., & Bhuyan, M. (2025). Unveiling Sybil Attacks Using AI‐Driven Techniques in Software‐Defined Vehicular Networks. Security and Privacy, 8(1), e487. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Pierro, G. A., & Tonelli, R. (2022). Can solana be the solution to the Blockchain scalability problem?. In 2022 IEEE international conference on software analysis, evolution and reengineering (SANER) (pp. 1219-1226). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Sankritik, A., & Shetty, S. (2025). Digital Public Infrastructure: Setting Standards with the Hourglass Model. Background paper prepared for World Development Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Shreya, K. G., Joshi, A. A., & Kamath, D. (2025, June). Cryptocurrency and UPI Convergence: A Next-Gen Digital Payment System. In 2025 International Conference on Computing Technologies (ICOCT) (pp. 1-7). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Smith, B. (2025). A novel digital payment architecture: A unified payment interface and its systematic transformation of financial infrastructure. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tillemann, T. (2022). How Digital Systems Will Transform the Future of Money and Development. Breakthrough: The Promise of Frontier Technologies for Sustainable Development, 181. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Wood, G. (2014). Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. Ethereum project yellow paper, 151(2014),1-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Yakovenko, A. (2018). Solana: A new architecture for a high performance Blockchain v0. 8.13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.