Intra-Gender Exploitation Among Women at Workplace: A Socio-Organizational and Psychological Analysis | IJLTEMAS
00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Intra-Gender Exploitation Among Women at Workplace: A Socio-Organizational and Psychological Analysis

Authors

Mitali Saikia

Department of Assamese, Tezpur College (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600106

Subject Category: Intra-Gender

Volume/Issue: 15/6 | Page No: 1523-1530

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-16

Published: 2026-07-13

Abstract

The phenomenon of intra-gender workplace exploitation—specifically women targeting other women—presents a complex, multi-layered challenge within modern corporate and academic environments. While historical gender studies have focused extensively on patriarchal, inter-gender power dynamics, contemporary organizational research demonstrates that women face distinct, often invisible psychological and professional hurdles from their female peers and superiors. Evaluating this behavior strictly through an individual psychological lens risks oversimplifying complex workplace realities. This paper examines intra-gender exploitation not as isolated interpersonal friction, but as a systemic pathology shaped by institutional power structures, structural scarcity, and intersecting socio-demographic variables including age, cultural background, and hierarchical status.

Keywords

Intra-Gender, Workplace, Psychological, Analysis

Downloads

References

1. Buckels, E. E., Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). Behavioral confirmation of everyday sadism. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2201-2209. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Derks, B., Ellemers, N., van Laar, C., & de Groot, K. (2011). Do sexist organizational cultures create the Queen Bee? British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 519-535. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Derks, B., Van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2016). The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 456-469. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ellemers, N., van den Heuvel, H., de Gilder, D., Maass, A., & Bonvini, A. (2004). The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the Queen Bee syndrome? British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(3), 315-338. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Horney, K. (1937). The Neurotic Personality of Our Time. W. W. Norton & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Millett, K. (1970). Sexual Politics. Doubleday. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Staines, G., Jayaratne, T., & Tavris, C. (1974). The queen bee syndrome. Psychology Today, 7(8), 55-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Conflict, 33(47), 74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

Engineering,
Management &
Applied Science
Journal
(IJLTEMAS)
Published by RSIS International
Tower B, Suncity Success Tower
Golf Course Ext Rd, Sector 65
Gurugram, Haryana 122101, India
© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. Published under CC BY 4.0. ISSN 2278-2540.