Intra-Gender Exploitation Among Women at Workplace: A Socio-Organizational and Psychological Analysis
Authors
Mitali Saikia
Department of Assamese, Tezpur College (IN)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600106
Subject Category: Intra-Gender
Volume/Issue: 15/6 | Page No: 1523-1530
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-16
Published: 2026-07-13
Abstract
The phenomenon of intra-gender workplace exploitation—specifically women targeting other women—presents a complex, multi-layered challenge within modern corporate and academic environments. While historical gender studies have focused extensively on patriarchal, inter-gender power dynamics, contemporary organizational research demonstrates that women face distinct, often invisible psychological and professional hurdles from their female peers and superiors. Evaluating this behavior strictly through an individual psychological lens risks oversimplifying complex workplace realities. This paper examines intra-gender exploitation not as isolated interpersonal friction, but as a systemic pathology shaped by institutional power structures, structural scarcity, and intersecting socio-demographic variables including age, cultural background, and hierarchical status.
Keywords
Intra-Gender, Workplace, Psychological, Analysis
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Downloads
References
1. Buckels, E. E., Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). Behavioral confirmation of everyday sadism. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2201-2209. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Derks, B., Ellemers, N., van Laar, C., & de Groot, K. (2011). Do sexist organizational cultures create the Queen Bee? British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 519-535. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Derks, B., Van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2016). The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 456-469. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Ellemers, N., van den Heuvel, H., de Gilder, D., Maass, A., & Bonvini, A. (2004). The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the Queen Bee syndrome? British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(3), 315-338. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Horney, K. (1937). The Neurotic Personality of Our Time. W. W. Norton & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Millett, K. (1970). Sexual Politics. Doubleday. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Staines, G., Jayaratne, T., & Tavris, C. (1974). The queen bee syndrome. Psychology Today, 7(8), 55-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Conflict, 33(47), 74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Enhancing Formation Control of Multi Agent Systems Using Ann Based Technique
- Improving Sliding Mode Control with Chattering Reduction using Fuzzy Based Technique
- Cooking Quality, Fasting Blood Glucose, Glycemic Index and Load of High–Fiber Noodles Made from Wheat, Tiger Nut Residue and Cassava Flour Blends
- Matrix Rhythm Therapy Versus Interferential Therapy Combined with Lumbar Stabilization Exercises in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Comparative Trial
- Formulation and Sensory Evaluation of Functional Cake Prepared from Sweet Potato Powder