Numerical Investigation of Geogrid-Reinforced Strip Foundations Subjected to Adjacent Excavation Using PLAXIS 2D
Authors
Uday Shankar S
Assistant Professor, Department Civil Engineering, SJCE, JSS STU, Mysore (IN)
Manoj Kumar H R
Assistant Professor, Department Civil Engineering, SJCE, JSS STU, Mysore (IN)
Skanda D
Student, Department Civil Engineering, SJCE, JSS STU, Mysore (IN)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600206
Subject Category: Numerical Investigation
Volume/Issue: 15/6 | Page No: 2801-2809
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-22
Published: 2026-07-22
Abstract
Excavation activities carried out near existing foundations can significantly alter the stress state of the surrounding soil, resulting in reduced bearing capacity and increased settlement that may compromise the stability and serviceability of structures. This issue is particularly important in urban areas, where new construction is frequently undertaken adjacent to existing buildings with limited available space. The present study evaluates the effectiveness of geogrid reinforcement in improving the performance of strip foundations subjected to the influence of nearby excavations through numerical modelling using PLAXIS 2D. A series of finite element analyses was performed by varying the excavation depth and horizontal distance from the existing strip foundation to assess their effects on foundation behaviour. Both reinforced and unreinforced soil conditions were analysed under identical loading and boundary conditions to enable a systematic comparison of their performance. The response of the foundation system was evaluated in terms of ultimate bearing capacity and settlement. The numerical results demonstrate that the incorporation of geogrid reinforcement effectively mitigates the adverse effects of adjacent excavation by improving the load-carrying capacity of the foundation soil and limiting excessive deformation. Depending on the excavation geometry, the reinforced soil exhibited an increase in ultimate bearing capacity ranging from 14% to 27%, while the corresponding settlement decreased by approximately 11% to 16% compared with the unreinforced condition. The improvement is attributed to the ability of the geogrid to provide tensile reinforcement, enhance stress distribution, and improve soil confinement beneath the foundation. Overall, the study demonstrates that geogrid reinforcement is an effective ground improvement technique for maintaining the stability and performance of existing strip foundations subjected to nearby excavation, thereby providing useful guidance for the design and rehabilitation of foundation systems in urban construction projects.
Keywords
Bearing Capacity, Settlement, Geogrid, Foundation soil, Excavation.
Downloads
References
1. Abu-Farsakh, M., Chen, Q., & Sharma, R. (2013). An experimental evaluation of the behavior of footings on geogrid-reinforced sand. Soils and Foundations, 53(2), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2013.02.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bathurst, R. J., & Hatami, K. (1998). Development and verification of a numerical model for reinforced soil structures. Computers and Geotechnics, 22(2), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(98)00005-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Das, B. M. (2016). Principles of foundation engineering (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Han, J. (2015). Principles and practice of ground improvement. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Indian Standards Institution. (1981). IS 6403: Code of practice for determination of bearing capacity of shallow foundations. Bureau of Indian Standards. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Indian Standards Institution. (1986). IS 1904: Code of practice for design and construction of foundations in soils. Bureau of Indian Standards. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Koerner, R. M. (2012). Designing with geosynthetics (6th ed.). Xlibris Corporation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Madhav, M. R., & Vitkar, P. P. (1978). Strip footing on weak clay stabilized with a granular trench or pile. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 15(4), 605–609. https://doi.org/10.1139/t78-063 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. PLAXIS BV. (2023). PLAXIS 2D reference manual. Bentley Systems. https://www.bentley.com/software/plaxis-2d/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Sharma, R., Chen, Q., Abu-Farsakh, M., & Yoon, S. (2009). Analytical modeling of geogrid reinforced foundations. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.03.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Terzaghi, K., Peck, R. B., & Mesri, G. (1996). Soil mechanics in engineering practice (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Yetimoglu, T., Wu, J. T. H., & Saglamer, A. (1994). Bearing capacity of rectangular footings on geogrid-reinforced sand. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 120(12), 2083–2099. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:12(2083). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Huang, C. C., Tatsuoka, F., & Sato, Y. (1994). Failure mechanisms of reinforced sand slopes loaded with a footing. Soils and Foundations, 34(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.34.2_27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Leshchinsky, D., & Ling, H. I. (2013). Geosynthetic reinforced soil structures. In K. H. Head (Ed.), Manual of Geotechnical Engineering (pp. 998–1028). ICE Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Michalowski, R. L. (2004). Limit loads on reinforced foundation soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 130(4), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:4(381). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Palmeira, E. M. (2009). Soil–geosynthetic interaction: Modelling and analysis. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27(5), 368–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.03.003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Rowe, R. K., & Ho, S. K. (1998). Horizontal deformation in reinforced embankments over soft foundations. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 35(2), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1139/t97-100. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Shin, E. C., Das, B. M., & Puri, V. K. (2002). Bearing capacity of strip foundations on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 20(3), 169–180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Yetimoglu, T., Inanir, M., & Inanir, O. E. (2005). A study on bearing capacity of randomly distributed fiber-reinforced sand fills overlying soft clay. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 23(2), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2004.09.001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Enhancing Formation Control of Multi Agent Systems Using Ann Based Technique
- Improving Sliding Mode Control with Chattering Reduction using Fuzzy Based Technique
- Cooking Quality, Fasting Blood Glucose, Glycemic Index and Load of High–Fiber Noodles Made from Wheat, Tiger Nut Residue and Cassava Flour Blends
- Matrix Rhythm Therapy Versus Interferential Therapy Combined with Lumbar Stabilization Exercises in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Comparative Trial
- Formulation and Sensory Evaluation of Functional Cake Prepared from Sweet Potato Powder