Handloom 4.0: An AI-Assisted D2C Framework for Sambalpuri Saree Weavers - A Participatory Design Study in Kardola Village, Odisha
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Background. Kardola Village in Sambalpur district, Odisha-formally adopted by Odisha State Open University (OSOU) under the Unnat Bharat Abhiyan (UBA)-comprises forty-five weaving households (142 members) whose livelihoods depend on the production of Sambalpuri Ikat (Bandha) handloom sarees. Field data indicate monthly household incomes of ₹4,500-₹8,000, with variation driven largely by differential market access rather than craft quality. Because nearly all output is sold through local trader intermediaries, weavers realise only a fraction of the eventual retail value of their products.
Objective. This study documents the current production and marketing conditions of the Kardola weaving community and, on that empirical basis, develops and specifies the Handloom 4.0 framework: an AI-assisted, Direct-to-Customer (D2C) digital commerce model intended to reduce trader dependence and improve income realisation.
Methods. A Participatory Design methodology was applied. Primary data were collected through a household census (N = 45), semi-structured interviews with primary earning members, four focus group discussions, structured observation of production and transaction practices, and iterative co-design workshops. Qualitative data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis; quantitative baseline indicators were triangulated across interview, observation, and group-verification sources. The framework was refined through member checking and expert review.
Findings. The baseline analysis indicates that income suppression is primarily a function of channel structure and credit dependence rather than production capacity, and that the community already possesses substantial latent digital assets (smartphone access in 38 of 45 households; active WhatsApp use in 36). The Handloom 4.0 framework is specified in five integrated layers: an AI-assisted product catalogue, WhatsApp-first social commerce, QR/UPI-based direct payment, aggregated community logistics, and a producer-company governance structure.
Projected outcomes and limitations. Using an income model derived from observed price differentials, the framework is projected-under stated adoption and demand assumptions-to raise monthly household income toward ₹12,000-₹18,000 and to reduce trader dependence over an eighteen-month horizon. These figures are analytical projections rather than measured results; empirical validation through a controlled pilot is identified as the essential next stage. The study contributes a transferable, community-centred model for artisan D2C transformation while explicitly delineating its evidentiary boundaries.
Downloads
References
Bai, Y., Yao, Z., & Dou, Y. F. (2015). Effect of social commerce factors on user purchase behavior: An empirical investigation from renren.com. International Journal of Information Management, 35(5), 538-550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.011
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chambers, R. (1994). Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience. World Development, 22(9), 1253-1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90003-5
Chari, S. (2017). The political economy of handloom weaving in India: Historical legacies and contemporary predicaments. Development and Change, 48(6), 1289-1314. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12340
Das, P. K. (2015). Sambalpuri handloom: Cultural heritage, economic distress and developmental interventions. Odisha Review, 71(8), 54-63.
De Souza Mendes, J., Pereira da Silva, R., & Oliveira, L. (2021). Deep learning-based textile pattern recognition for cultural heritage authentication. Pattern Recognition Letters, 144, 112-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2021.01.017
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., & Williams, M. D. (2019). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.
Ghosh, A., & Bhattacharyya, R. (2022). Digital payment adoption and financial inclusion: Evidence from UPI in rural India. Journal of Development Economics, 158, 102946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.102946
GI Registry, Government of India. (2007). Geographical indication registration - Sambalpuri Handloom (Registration No. 44). Intellectual Property India.
Hajli, N. (2015). Social commerce constructs and consumer's intention to buy. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.12.005
Kumar, A. (2013). Fab India: Weaving social enterprise. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 2(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277977913477285
Kumar, S., & Priya, M. (2018). E-commerce adoption among rural artisan cooperatives: A TAM study from Tamil Nadu. International Journal of Rural Management, 14(2), 134-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973005218794441
Liakos, K. G., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S., & Bochtis, D. (2018). Machine learning in agriculture: A review. Sensors, 18(8), 2674. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082674
Mishra, R. K., & Mishra, P. (2016). Cooperatives and handloom weaver welfare in Odisha: An institutional analysis. Journal of Rural Development, 35(2), 197-218.
Nayak, A. K., & Mishra, D. (2020). Price spread and marketing efficiency of Sambalpuri handloom products in Odisha. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 33(2), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2020.00016.4
Prakash, A., & Tejasvi, A. (2019). Digital cooperatives and artisan market access: The GoCoop model. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 10(2), 198-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1541003
Randhawa, P., Wilden, R., & Hohberger, J. (2021). A bibliometric review of open innovation: Setting a research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(4), 814-854. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12573
Roy, A. (2019). Supply chain feudalism and rural artisan exploitation in India: A political economy perspective. Journal of Agrarian Change, 19(3), 467-487. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12313
Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum / Crown Business.
Sharma, R., Mishra, R., & Mishra, P. (2020). Digital trust and rural e-commerce adoption: Evidence from artisan communities in India. Information Technology & People, 33(5), 1505-1529. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-06-2019-0262
Tewari, M., & Singh, H. (2017). Handloom weavers, technology and the challenge of sustained upgrading: Insights from Varanasi's silk weaving cluster. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 12(3), 480-502. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-10-2015-0218
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889-901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
Whyte, W. F. (Ed.). (1991). Participatory action research. SAGE Publications.
Xu, A., Liu, Z., Guo, Y., Sinha, V., & Akkiraju, R. (2017). A new chatbot for customer service on social media. In CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3506-3510). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025496
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in our journal are licensed under CC-BY 4.0, which permits authors to retain copyright of their work. This license allows for unrestricted use, sharing, and reproduction of the articles, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors and the source.