00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Water Quality Monitoring for the Sustainable Management of Aquatic Ecosystem in the Markandeya Dam Reservoir, Kolar District, Karnataka, India

Authors

Gayathri S

Water Quality Research Unit, Department of Zoology, Bangalore University — JB Campus, Bengaluru 560056, Karnataka, India (IN)

Tejushree H. S.

Water Quality Research Unit, Department of Zoology, Bangalore University — JB Campus, Bengaluru 560056, Karnataka, India (IN)

Yashaswini R.

Water Quality Research Unit, Department of Zoology, Bangalore University — JB Campus, Bengaluru 560056, Karnataka, India (IN)

Shashikumar C.

Water Quality Research Unit, Department of Zoology, Bangalore University — JB Campus, Bengaluru 560056, Karnataka, India (IN)

Shravani. K

Water Quality Research Unit, Department of Zoology, Bangalore University — JB Campus, Bengaluru 560056, Karnataka, India (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600224

Subject Category: Water Quality

Volume/Issue: 15/6 | Page No: 3052-3066

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-25

Published: 2026-07-25

Abstract

Water is an irreplaceable natural resource and the cornerstone of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems alike. Dams and reservoirs are critical infrastructure that support biodiversity, agriculture, potable water supply, hydropower generation, flood mitigation, and recreation. Despite their ecological importance, reservoir water quality remains vulnerable to seasonal fluctuations, anthropogenic pollution, and nutrient enrichment. The present study evaluates the physico-chemical characteristics and plankton community structure of Markandeya Dam, Kolar District, Karnataka, India, across pre-monsoon, monsoon, and post-monsoon seasons from February to July 2025. Phytoplankton (22 taxa) and zooplankton (14 taxa) were enumerated and subjected to nine diversity indices. A Water Quality Index (WQI) computed via the Weighted Arithmetic Index method yielded a value of 46.57, classifying the reservoir as moderately polluted. Nygaard's Water Quality Indices (NWQI) further indicated a mesotrophic trophic status. Most physico-chemical parameters conformed to WHO and BIS drinking-water standards; however, dissolved oxygen variability and elevated faecal coliform counts signal localized organic pollution and microbial contamination risks. Shannon–Wiener diversity indices for both phytoplankton (H' = 0–1.45) and zooplankton (H' = 0–0.92) indicated moderate pollution, with dominance by Chlorophyceae and Monogononta rotifers, respectively. Seasonal patterns revealed higher diversity and species richness during cooler pre-monsoon months and greater dominance during warm transitional periods. The integration of WQI, NWQI, and multi-index plankton assessment constitutes a robust and replicable framework for the ecological monitoring and sustainable management of tropical reservoir ecosystems.

Keywords

Physico-chemical parameters; Water Quality Index; Nygaard's Water Quality Indices; Phytoplankton diversity; Zooplankton community; Mesotrophic reservoir; Kolar District; Karnataka

Downloads

References

1. APHA (2005). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (21st ed.). American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Asulabha, K. S., Jaishanker, R., Sincy, V., & Ramachandra, T. V. (2022). Diversity of phytoplankton in lakes of Bangalore, Karnataka, India. In Biodiversity Challenges: A Way Forward (pp. 147–178). Springer, New Delhi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Balseiro, E., Modenutti, B., Gutierrez, M. A., Sagarario, M. A. G., & Laspoumaderes, C. (2023). Status of zooplankton ecology in freshwater ecosystems from Argentina. Limnologica, 100, 126011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2022.126011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Basavaraj, S. K., & Kadadevaru, G. G. (2024). Assessment of physicochemical parameters and zooplankton community at Gopalaswamy tank, Chitradurga, Karnataka. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 17(4), 368–372. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Beyene, G., Kifle, D., & Fetahi, T. (2022). Spatial distribution of zooplankton in relation to selected physico-chemical parameters of Lake Hawassa, Ethiopia. African Journal of Aquatic Science, 47(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2021.2003746 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Brown RM, McClelland NI, Deininger RA, Tozer RG (1970) A water quality index: do we dare? Water & Sewage Works,117(10):339-343. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS 2003) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chen, X., Zhang, Y., & Li, Q. (2021). Lakes as indicators of environmental change: Impacts of pollution, land-use change, and climate variability. Global Environmental Change, 70, 102345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Enawgaw, Y., Wagaw, S., Wosnie, A., & Fetahi, T. (2023). Zooplankton as ecosystem indicators and their effects on eutrophication in Lake Arekit, Ethiopia. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 38(1), 2287433. https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2023.2287433 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Falkowski, P. G., & Raven, J. A. (2007). Aquatic Photosynthesis (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Farnaz, S., & Rahmatullah, M. (2021). Study of water quality using physico-chemical parameters of two perennial ponds of Darbhanga District, Bihar. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies, 9(5), 95–98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Garg, A. (2022). Physico-chemical parameters and planktons of water samples from Taraori pond and Karna Lake, Karnal, Haryana. International Journal of Research in Engineering Sciences, 10(9), 456–464. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ginatullina, E. N., Kurbanov, A. R., & Tuychiev, K. S. (2023). Influence of environmental factors on zooplankton communities in a large lake system in Uzbekistan. E3S Web of Conferences, 407, 01004. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340701004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A., & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Horton, R. K. (1965). An index-number system for rating water quality. Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, 37(3), 300–305. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hutchinson, G. E. (1967). A Treatise on Limnology, Vol. 2: Introduction to Lake Biology and the Limnoplankton. John Wiley & Sons, New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Imoobe, T. O. T., & Akoma, A. O. (2008). Assessment of zooplankton community structure of the Bahir Dar gulf of Lake Tana, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management, 1(2), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejesm.v1i2.41577 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Johnson, K. E., & Wang, H. (2020). Ecological dynamics of lakes: Nutrient loading, sedimentation, and climatic influences. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(7), 1502–1517. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11432 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kour, S., Slathia, D., Sharma, N., Kour, S., & Verma, R. (2022). Zooplankton as bio-indicators of trophic status of a lentic water source, Jammu. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, 92, 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-022-01349-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Manjare, S. A., Vhanalakar, S. A., & Muley, D. V. (2010). Analysis of water quality using physico-chemical parameters of Tamdalge tank in Kolhapur District, Maharashtra. International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology Research, 1(2), 115–119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Miller, J. R., & Lake, P. S. (2014). Lakes and their role in regional hydrology and ecology. Environmental Reviews, 22(3), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2014-0023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mohammed, A., Mengistou, S., & Fetahi, T. (2023). Effects of water quality parameters, water level changes, and mixing on zooplankton community dynamics in tropical Lake Ardibo, Ethiopia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195, 927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11500-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ndah, A. B., et al. (2022). Zooplankton diversity and its relationship with water quality indicators. Freshwater Biology, 67(4), 712–729. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Nygaard, G. (1949). Hydrobiological studies on some Danish ponds and lakes. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Biologiske Skrifter, 7(1), 1–293. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Oh, W. S., Park, G. C., Choi, J. H., Lee, H. B., & Lee, K. (2023). Density estimation of euphausiids and copepods by multi-frequency method. Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 26(12), 689–697. https://doi.org/10.47853/FAS.2023.e61 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Rashid, H., & Prakash, A. (2022). Zooplankton community structure as water quality indicators in freshwater bodies of Jammu, India. Journal of Limnology, 81(2), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Smith, J. A., Brown, L. M., & Taylor, K. (2018). Freshwater biodiversity: Conservation status and threats to lakes. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 28(5), 1112–1127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Wilhm, J. L., & Dorris, T. C. (1968). Biological parameters for water quality criteria. BioScience, 18(6), 477–481. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. World Health Organization (WHO 2005) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.