00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Generalized Additive Modeling of Photovoltaic Backsheet Tensile Strength Degradation Under Multi-Stressor Field Conditions

Authors

Joseph Moses

Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD 21251, USA (US)

Tridip K. Bardhan

Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD 21251, USA (US)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600244

Subject Category: Modeling

Volume/Issue: 15/6 | Page No: 3321-3337

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-01

Published: 2026-08-01

Abstract

Photovoltaic module reliability depends on the long-term mechanical durability of polymeric backsheets that provide electrical insulation, moisture protection, and structural support. Accurate prediction of backsheet degradation is therefore essential for reliability-centered operation, maintenance scheduling, and lifecycle management of photovoltaic systems. This study develops a Generalized Additive Model (GAM) with penalized thin-plate regression splines and ridge regularization to predict tensile strength degradation under multi-stressor field conditions, benchmarked against ordinary least squares (OLS), weighted least squares (WLS), and Random Forest (RF) regression using 511 consecutive daily field observations of a PET/PET/EVA multilayer photovoltaic backsheet. The GAM achieves in-sample R² = 0.998 and RMSE = 0.8 MPa, compared with R² = 0.925 and RMSE = 4.69 MPa for OLS, and R² = 0.92 and RMSE = 4.84 MPa for WLS. RF achieves R² = 1.0 and RMSE = 0.2 MPa in-sample but captures no physically interpretable structure beyond UV dominance. Residual variance scales with cumulative UV dose at an exponent of α = 0.592 (SE = 0.105, p < 0.001). A biphasic degradation regime is identified, with tensile strength declining at 0.18 MPa/(MJ/m²) below a UV threshold of 196.5 MJ/m², and accelerating to 0.574 MPa/(MJ/m²) above it, a factor of 3.19. The GAM framework provides a physically interpretable and statistically defensible tool for forecasting photovoltaic backsheet degradation trajectories, with direct implications for predictive maintenance scheduling, module replacement planning, and reliability certification of photovoltaic systems.

Keywords

photovoltaic backsheet; tensile strength degradation; generalized additive model; penalized splines; ridge regularization

Downloads

References

1. Khan, Z.U.; Khan, A.D.; Khan, K.; AlKhatib, S.A.K.; Khan, S.; Khan, M.Q.; Ullah, A. A Review of Degradation and Reliability Analysis of a Solar PV Module. IEEE Access 2024, 1–1, doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3432394. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al Mahdi, H.; Leahy, P.G.; Alghoul, M.; Morrison, A.P. A Review of Photovoltaic Module Failure and Degradation Mechanisms: Causes and Detection Techniques. Solar 2024, 4, 43–82, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/solar4010003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Mansour, D.E.; Barretta, C.; Pitta Bauermann, L.; Oreski, G.; Schueler, A.; Philipp, D.; Gebhardt, P. Effect of Backsheet Properties on PV Encapsulant Degradation during Combined Accelerated Aging Tests. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5208, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125208. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Gaddam, S.K.; Pothu, R.; Boddula, R. Advanced Polymer Encapsulates for Photovoltaic Devices − a Review. Journal of Materiomics 2021, 7, 920–928, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat.2021.04.004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Julien, S.E.; Kempe, M.D.; Eafanti, J.J.; Morse, J.; Wang, Y.; Fairbrother, A.; Napoli, S.; Hauser, A.W.; Ji, L.; O’Brien, G.S.; et al. Characterizing Photovoltaic Backsheet Adhesion Degradation Using the Wedge and Single Cantilever Beam Tests, Part I: Field Modules. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 2020, 215, 110669, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2020.110669. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gebhardt, P.; Rivera, M.; Fokuhl, E.; Reise, C.; Schnabel, E.; Pander, M.; Hädrich, I. UV-Induced Degradation: Comparative Analysis of PV Module Testing and Stabilization Procedures against Outdoor Behavior. EPJ Photovoltaics 2026, 17, 15, doi:https://doi.org/10.1051/epjpv/2026007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Acar, I.; Pozan, G.S.; Özgümüş, S. Thermal Oxidative Degradation Kinetics and Thermal Properties of Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate) Modified with Poly(Lactic Acid). Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2008, 109, 2747–2755, doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/app.28142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Lomakin, S.; Mikheev, Y.; Usachev, S.; Rogovina, S.; Zhorina, L.; Perepelitsina, E.; Levina, I.; Kuznetsova, O.; Shilkina, N.; Iordanskii, A.; et al. Evaluation and Modeling of Polylactide Photodegradation under Ultraviolet Irradiation: Bio-Based Polyester Photolysis Mechanism. Polymers 2024, 16, 985, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16070985. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Zhang, J.-W.; Feng, K.; Diaham, S.; Liao, Q.-Q.; Zhou, X.; Putson, C. Lifetime Evaluation of Photovoltaic Polymeric Backsheets under Ultraviolet Radiation: From Chemical Properties to Mechanical Modeling. ACS omega 2022, 7, 45609–45616, doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c06424. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Uličná, S.; Sinha, A.; Miller, D.C.; Habersberger, B.M.; Schelhas, L.T.; Owen-Bellini, M. PV Encapsulant Formulations and Stress Test Conditions Influence Dominant Degradation Mechanisms. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 2023, 255, 112319, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2023.112319. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Wood, S.N. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R, 2nd ed.; Chapman and Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017; ISBN 9781315370279. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R. Generalized additive models. Statistical Science 1986, 1, 297–310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177013604. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 62788-1-6: Measurement Procedures for Materials Used in Photovoltaic Modules—Part 1-6: Encapsulants—Test Methods for Optical Properties; IEC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Abdallah, A.A.; Abdelrahim, M.; Elgaili, M.; Pasha, M.; Mroue, K.; Abutaha, A. Degradation of Photovoltaic Module Backsheet Materials in Desert Climate. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 2024, 277, 113118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2024.113118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Afridi, M.; Kumar, A.; ibne Mahmood, F.; Tamizhmani, G. Hotspot Testing of Glass/Backsheet and Glass/Glass PV Modules Pre-Stressed in Extended Thermal Cycling. Solar Energy 2023, 249, 467–475, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.12.006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Okonkwo, P.C.; Nwokolo, S.C.; Udo, S.O.; Obiwulu, A.U.; Onnoghen, U.N.; Alarifi, S.S.; Eldosouky, A.M.; Ekwok, S.E.; Andráš, P.; Akpan, A.E. Solar PV Systems under Weather Extremes: Case Studies, Classification, Vulnerability Assessment, and Adaptation Pathways. Energy Reports 2024, 13, 929–959, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.12.067. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kraska, P.; Hanzel, K. Comparison of Electricity Production Prediction Models Based on Meteorological Data for PV Farms in Poland—Challenges and Problems. Solar 2026, 6, 16, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/solar6020016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Wu, D.; Wessel, P.; Zhu, J.; Montiel-Chicharro, D.; Betts, T.R.; Mordvinkin, A.; Gottschalg, R. Influence of Lamination Conditions of EVA Encapsulation on Photovoltaic Module Durability. Materials 2023, 16, 6945–6945, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16216945. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Haillant, O. Accelerated Weathering Testing Principles to Estimate the Service Life of Organic PV Modules. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 2011, 95, 1284–1292, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2010.08.033. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Koester, L.; Lindig, S.; Louwen, A.; Astigarraga, A.; Manzolini, G.; Moser, D. Review of Photovoltaic Module Degradation, Field Inspection Techniques and Techno-Economic Assessment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2022, 165, 112616, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112616. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. IEA PVPS Review of Failures of Photovoltaic Modules; 2014; [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Nelson, W. Accelerated Testing: Statistical Models, Test Plans and Data Analyses. Wiley, New York.; Wiley, 1990; [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Greene, W. Econometric Analysis, 8th ed.; Pearson Education: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.