Effects of Neuromuscular Control Training and Proprioceptive Exercise on Pain, Pelvic Stability, and Functional Outcomes in Patients with Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
Authors
Sarfraz Ahmad
Physiosic Neuro Spine and Joints Pain Care Center, Pakistan (PK)
Maryam Murtaza
House officer at Independent University Hospital, Faisalabad, Pakistan (PK)
Chaman Lal
BSPT, PPDPT (M.Phil Physiotherapy), MPH, MA (Physical Education & Sports Injuries), R.EEGT (ABRET-USA), PGC in Clinical Neurophysiology (AKUH), Diploma in Pain Management (UK), Diploma in Pharmacy (PPCL), PhD Health Sciences Scholar, Pakistan. (PK)
Mahnoor Zehra
Senior Physiotherapist, Pakistan (PK)
Jeeya Paul
Assistant Professor Faculty of Allied Health SciencesRoyal University of Medical and Information Sciences (RUMIS)(formerly Royal Institute of Medical Sciences - RIMS), Multan, Pakistan (PK)
Ishma Illyas
Physiotherapist at InMotion Rehabilitation Clinic, Pakistan (PK)
Hafiza Mubeen sahar
Physiotherapist at Alkarim Hospital,Nankana sahib (PK)
Hafiza Mubashra zahid
Senior physiotherapist at Alkarim Hospital,Nankana sahib (PK)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600280
Subject Category: Neuromuscular
Volume/Issue: 15/6 | Page No: 3784-3797
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-03
Published: 2026-08-03
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate the efficacy of neuromuscular control training combined with proprioceptive exercises on pain reduction, pelvic stability, and functional outcomes in patients with sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction compared to standard care.
Methods: A prospective, randomized controlled trial with 124 participants (intervention n=62, control n=62) conducted over 12 weeks at three academic medical centers. Intervention group received 2-3 supervised sessions per week of structured neuromuscular training targeting core stabilizers and proprioceptive exercises. Control group received standard care consisting of patient education and general exercise. Primary outcomes assessed at baseline, weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain (0-10), Posterior Superior Iliac Spine Distance Ratio (PSIS-DR) for pelvic stability assessment, and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS, 0-80 points). Secondary outcomes included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form-36 (SF-36) quality of life measures, proprioceptive function, and core muscular strength.
Results: Intention-to-treat analysis of 121 participants (97.6% retention). Intervention group demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements across all primary outcomes. VAS pain reduction: 5.2±1.8 points (77% improvement) in intervention versus 1.3±1.5 points (19% improvement) in controls (p<0.001, 95% CI: 3.1-4.9). Pelvic stability improvement: 3.4±1.1 mm (41.5% reduction in asymmetry) in intervention versus 0.6±0.8 mm (7.1% reduction) in controls (p<0.001, 95% CI: 2.4-4.4). LEFS functional improvement: 28.5±6.7 points (88% recovery) in intervention versus 7.2±5.3 points (23% recovery) in controls (p<0.001, 95% CI: 18.3-23.8). Large effect sizes (Cohen's d) demonstrated for all primary outcomes (d=1.8-2.6). Benefits sustained at 6-month follow-up with minimal regression. 68% of intervention participants achieved clinically normal pelvic alignment versus 11% in controls (p<0.001). Session adherence: 95.2% (34.2±2.1 of 36 prescribed sessions). Home exercise compliance: 78.4%. Adverse events: no serious adverse events; mild self-limiting muscle soreness in 30% of intervention participants during week 1-2.
Conclusion: Structured neuromuscular control training combined with systematic proprioceptive exercise is highly effective for managing sacroiliac joint dysfunction, providing substantial and durable improvements in pain, pelvic stability, and functional capacity. This conservative intervention demonstrated superior efficacy compared to standard care with excellent safety profile and high patient adherence. Evidence supports position as first-line management for SIJ dysfunction.
Keywords
Sacroiliac joint dysfunction, neuromuscular control, proprioceptive training, core stability, pelvic stability, conservative management, rehabilitation, randomized controlled trial
Downloads
References
1. Szadek KM, van der Wurff P, van Tulder MW, et al. Diagnostic validity of criteria for sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):133-136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Falco FJ, et al. An update of comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for interventional techniques in chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician. 2013;16(2):E87-E127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Dreyfuss P, Michaelsen M, Pauza K, et al. The value of medical history and physical examination in diagnosing sacroiliac joint pain. Spine. 1996;21(21):2594-2602. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Masi AT, et al. The sacroiliac joint: an overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications. J Anat. 2012;221(6):537-567. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Hungerford B, Gilleard W, Hodges P. Evidence of altered lumbopelvic muscle recruitment patterns during a single leg stand test in subjects with pelvic girdle pain. Spine. 2003;28(14):1578-1584. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Grigg P. Peripheral neural mechanisms in proprioception. J Sport Rehabil. 1994;3(1):2-17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Patterson MJ, Thompson JR. Neuromuscular control training in sacroiliac joint dysfunction: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022;52(4):181-195. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Tarnanen S, Niemi T, Vanninen E, Kankaanpää M. Postural deviation in patients with low back pain: changes after conservative treatment. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(1):80-89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, et al. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(6):2028-2037. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Miller R, Dimick J, Tetrick L. A longitudinal analysis of clinical and structural changes in sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Clin Anat. 2021;34(3):412-421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Ribando CA, Kohli R, Fortuna S, et al. Effectiveness of physical therapy interventions for sacroiliac joint dysfunction. J Sport Rehabil. 2020;29(3):264-273. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Cohen SP. Sacroiliac joint pain: epidemiology, diagnosis, and interventional management. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(4):937-948. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Maigne JY, Aivaliklis A, Pfefer F. Results of sacroiliac joint double block and value of sacroiliac joint pain provocation tests in 54 patients with low back pain. Spine. 1996;21(16):1889-1892. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Fortin JD, Dwyer AP, West S, et al. Sacroiliac joint dysfunction and low back pain in mechanical low back pain syndromes. Spine. 1994;19(8):930-934. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Mens JM, Vleeming A, Snijders CJ, et al. Reliability and validity of the active straight leg raise test in posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy. Spine. 2001;26(10):1167-1171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Enhancing Formation Control of Multi Agent Systems Using Ann Based Technique
- Improving Sliding Mode Control with Chattering Reduction using Fuzzy Based Technique
- Cooking Quality, Fasting Blood Glucose, Glycemic Index and Load of High–Fiber Noodles Made from Wheat, Tiger Nut Residue and Cassava Flour Blends
- Matrix Rhythm Therapy Versus Interferential Therapy Combined with Lumbar Stabilization Exercises in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Comparative Trial
- Formulation and Sensory Evaluation of Functional Cake Prepared from Sweet Potato Powder