00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Effects of Neuromuscular Control Training and Proprioceptive Exercise on Pain, Pelvic Stability, and Functional Outcomes in Patients with Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

Authors

Sarfraz Ahmad

Physiosic Neuro Spine and Joints Pain Care Center, Pakistan (PK)

Maryam Murtaza

House officer at Independent University Hospital, Faisalabad, Pakistan (PK)

Chaman Lal

BSPT, PPDPT (M.Phil Physiotherapy), MPH, MA (Physical Education & Sports Injuries), R.EEGT (ABRET-USA), PGC in Clinical Neurophysiology (AKUH), Diploma in Pain Management (UK), Diploma in Pharmacy (PPCL), PhD Health Sciences Scholar, Pakistan. (PK)

Mahnoor Zehra

Senior Physiotherapist, Pakistan (PK)

Jeeya Paul

Assistant Professor Faculty of Allied Health SciencesRoyal University of Medical and Information Sciences (RUMIS)(formerly Royal Institute of Medical Sciences - RIMS), Multan, Pakistan (PK)

Ishma Illyas

Physiotherapist at InMotion Rehabilitation Clinic, Pakistan (PK)

Hafiza Mubeen sahar

Physiotherapist at Alkarim Hospital,Nankana sahib (PK)

Hafiza Mubashra zahid

Senior physiotherapist at Alkarim Hospital,Nankana sahib (PK)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600280

Subject Category: Neuromuscular

Volume/Issue: 15/6 | Page No: 3784-3797

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-03

Published: 2026-08-03

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the efficacy of neuromuscular control training combined with proprioceptive exercises on pain reduction, pelvic stability, and functional outcomes in patients with sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction compared to standard care.


Methods: A prospective, randomized controlled trial with 124 participants (intervention n=62, control n=62) conducted over 12 weeks at three academic medical centers. Intervention group received 2-3 supervised sessions per week of structured neuromuscular training targeting core stabilizers and proprioceptive exercises. Control group received standard care consisting of patient education and general exercise. Primary outcomes assessed at baseline, weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain (0-10), Posterior Superior Iliac Spine Distance Ratio (PSIS-DR) for pelvic stability assessment, and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS, 0-80 points). Secondary outcomes included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form-36 (SF-36) quality of life measures, proprioceptive function, and core muscular strength.


Results: Intention-to-treat analysis of 121 participants (97.6% retention). Intervention group demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements across all primary outcomes. VAS pain reduction: 5.2±1.8 points (77% improvement) in intervention versus 1.3±1.5 points (19% improvement) in controls (p<0.001, 95% CI: 3.1-4.9). Pelvic stability improvement: 3.4±1.1 mm (41.5% reduction in asymmetry) in intervention versus 0.6±0.8 mm (7.1% reduction) in controls (p<0.001, 95% CI: 2.4-4.4). LEFS functional improvement: 28.5±6.7 points (88% recovery) in intervention versus 7.2±5.3 points (23% recovery) in controls (p<0.001, 95% CI: 18.3-23.8). Large effect sizes (Cohen's d) demonstrated for all primary outcomes (d=1.8-2.6). Benefits sustained at 6-month follow-up with minimal regression. 68% of intervention participants achieved clinically normal pelvic alignment versus 11% in controls (p<0.001). Session adherence: 95.2% (34.2±2.1 of 36 prescribed sessions). Home exercise compliance: 78.4%. Adverse events: no serious adverse events; mild self-limiting muscle soreness in 30% of intervention participants during week 1-2.


Conclusion: Structured neuromuscular control training combined with systematic proprioceptive exercise is highly effective for managing sacroiliac joint dysfunction, providing substantial and durable improvements in pain, pelvic stability, and functional capacity. This conservative intervention demonstrated superior efficacy compared to standard care with excellent safety profile and high patient adherence. Evidence supports position as first-line management for SIJ dysfunction.

Keywords

Sacroiliac joint dysfunction, neuromuscular control, proprioceptive training, core stability, pelvic stability, conservative management, rehabilitation, randomized controlled trial

Downloads

References

1. Szadek KM, van der Wurff P, van Tulder MW, et al. Diagnostic validity of criteria for sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):133-136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Falco FJ, et al. An update of comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for interventional techniques in chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician. 2013;16(2):E87-E127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Dreyfuss P, Michaelsen M, Pauza K, et al. The value of medical history and physical examination in diagnosing sacroiliac joint pain. Spine. 1996;21(21):2594-2602. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Masi AT, et al. The sacroiliac joint: an overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications. J Anat. 2012;221(6):537-567. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hungerford B, Gilleard W, Hodges P. Evidence of altered lumbopelvic muscle recruitment patterns during a single leg stand test in subjects with pelvic girdle pain. Spine. 2003;28(14):1578-1584. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Grigg P. Peripheral neural mechanisms in proprioception. J Sport Rehabil. 1994;3(1):2-17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Patterson MJ, Thompson JR. Neuromuscular control training in sacroiliac joint dysfunction: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022;52(4):181-195. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Tarnanen S, Niemi T, Vanninen E, Kankaanpää M. Postural deviation in patients with low back pain: changes after conservative treatment. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(1):80-89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, et al. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(6):2028-2037. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Miller R, Dimick J, Tetrick L. A longitudinal analysis of clinical and structural changes in sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Clin Anat. 2021;34(3):412-421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ribando CA, Kohli R, Fortuna S, et al. Effectiveness of physical therapy interventions for sacroiliac joint dysfunction. J Sport Rehabil. 2020;29(3):264-273. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cohen SP. Sacroiliac joint pain: epidemiology, diagnosis, and interventional management. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(4):937-948. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Maigne JY, Aivaliklis A, Pfefer F. Results of sacroiliac joint double block and value of sacroiliac joint pain provocation tests in 54 patients with low back pain. Spine. 1996;21(16):1889-1892. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Fortin JD, Dwyer AP, West S, et al. Sacroiliac joint dysfunction and low back pain in mechanical low back pain syndromes. Spine. 1994;19(8):930-934. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mens JM, Vleeming A, Snijders CJ, et al. Reliability and validity of the active straight leg raise test in posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy. Spine. 2001;26(10):1167-1171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.