Neuro-Adaptive Blended Learning in AI – Rich Environments: Research Focus, Outcomes and the Road Ahead
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Right now, smart software learns as students do, shifting the balance away from rigid teaching formats. Instead of making learners fit the method, some tools adjust mid-step using brain research plus digital feedback loops. Outcomes begin standing out when classroom work blends with adaptive platforms tuned live through behaviour patterns. One analysis pulled findings from multiple experiments and big-picture summaries to track what happens behind the scenes. Results show stronger memory recall, sharper test outcomes, better mental effort control - around one-quarter to over one-third improvement across cases. Still, concerns about who owns data, upkeep expenses, fairness in automated choices pop up every time progress appears solid. Progress stalls unless tech grows hand-in-hand with proven education methods and access for all shapes of classrooms.
Downloads
References
Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2022). Algorithmic bias in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(4), 1052–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354–380.
Drachsler, H., & Greller, W. (2016). Privacy and analytics — it's a DELICATE issue a checklist for trusted learning analytics. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, 89–98.
Ezzaim, A., Dahbi, A., Haidine, A., & Aqqal, A. (2023). Enhancing academic outcomes through an adaptive learning framework utilizing a novel machine learning-based performance prediction method. Data and Metadata. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2023164
Ganthi, B., Sahana, M. S. G., & Sumangalai. (2025). NeuroLearn — AI-powered adaptive smart classroom. International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering and Management (IRJAEM). https://doi.org/10.47392/irjaem.2025.0542
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.
Gkintoni, E., Antonopoulou, H., Sortwell, A., & Halkiopoulos, C. (2025). Challenging Cognitive Load Theory: The role of educational neuroscience and artificial intelligence in redefining learning efficacy. Brain Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15020203
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of Blended Learning (pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer Publishing.
Howard-Jones, P. A. (2014). Neuroscience and education: Myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(12), 817–824.
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444.
Makeig, S., & Onton, J. (2011). ERP features and EEG dynamics: An ICA perspective. In S. J. Luck & E. S. Kappenman (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components (pp. 51–86). Oxford University Press.
Mousavinasab, E., Zarifsanaiey, N., Knight, R., Kalhori, S. R. N., Karimi, M., Shahsavari, L., & Gharib, M. (2021). Intelligent tutoring systems: A systematic review of characteristics, applications, and evaluation methods. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(1), 142–163.
Pekrun, R. (2011). Emotions as drivers of learning and cognitive development. In R. A. Calvo & S. D'Mello (Eds.), New Perspectives on Affect and Learning Technologies (pp. 23–39). Springer.
Plass, J. L., Moreno, R., & Brunken, R. (2010). Cognitive Load Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 582–599.
Scholkmann, F., Kleiser, S., Metz, A. J., Zimmermann, R., Mata Pavia, J., Wolf, U., & Wolf, M. (2014). A review on continuous wave functional near-infrared spectroscopy and imaging instrumentation and methodology. NeuroImage, 85, 6–27.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221.
Vandewaetere, M., & Clarebout, G. (2014). Advanced technologies for personalized learning, instruction, and performance. In J. M. Spector et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 425–437). Springer.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Xaveria, F., Kristianingsih, D., & Maharani, R. (2025). Artificial intelligence in adaptive education: A systematic review of techniques for personalized learning. Discover Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00908-6
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in our journal are licensed under CC-BY 4.0, which permits authors to retain copyright of their work. This license allows for unrestricted use, sharing, and reproduction of the articles, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors and the source.