Design and Finite Element Analysis of RCC and Timber-Composite RCC Columns with Seismic Effect
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
This study presents the design and finite-element analysis (FEM) of three reinforced cement concrete (RCC) column configurations under seismic effect, with the objective of quantifying how a central Sal-timber core alters the structural performance of an otherwise conventional RCC column. All three columns are of identical external size (300 × 300 mm) and clear height 3.0 m, fixed at both ends, and use M30 concrete, Fe500 steel, 4–16 mm φ longitudinal bars (steel ratio 0.89 %) and 8 mm φ ties at 150 mm c/c. The configurations are a plain RCC column (C1), and two timber-composite RCC columns with 100 × 100 mm (C2) and 150 × 150 mm (C3) Sal-timber cores. Each column is idealised as a fixed-fixed line member discretised into six Euler-Bernoulli beam elements, using transformed-section properties (modular ratios m = 7.30 for steel and n = 0.456 for timber). Axial capacity is computed per IS 456:2000, modal and elastic-buckling behaviour from the FEM stiffness, and seismic demand by the equivalent-static method of IS 1893 (Part 1):2016 for Zone V. The results show that, because the timber core sits near the neutral axis, flexural rigidity falls only 0.6 % (C2) and 3.1 % (C3) and lateral drift is practically unchanged, while self-weight drops 7 % and 16 % respectively, reducing seismic base shear and end moments by a similar margin. The principal penalty is a reduction in ultimate axial capacity of 6 % (C2) and 13 % (C3). All three columns remain short (buckling never governs), satisfy the 0.4 % drift limit, and plot safely within the P–M interaction envelope. The 100 × 100 mm timber core offers the best balance of weight and seismic-demand reduction with negligible loss of capacity.
Downloads
References
Azanaw, G. M. (2025). Timber-Concrete Composite Structures: A Comprehensive Review of Emerging Trends, Advanced Modeling Approaches, and Future Research Frontiers for Sustainable Hybrid Construction. Engineering and Applied Sciences, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eas.20251003.14
Dias, A., Schanzlin, J., & Dietsch, P. (Eds.) (2018). Design of Timber-Concrete Composite Structures: A State-of-the-Art Report by COST Action FP1402 / WG 4. Shaker Verlag.
Rodwell, J., & Neave, M. (2022). A Review of the Performance and Benefits of Mass Timber as an Alternative to Concrete and Steel for Improving the Sustainability of Structures. Sustainability, 14(9), 5570. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095570
Zhang, et al. (2024). Axial compressive performance of cruciform timber-encased steel composite columns: Experimental investigation and buckling analysis through 3D laser scanning. Engineering Structures / Composite Structures (ScienceDirect S0263823124004117). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024
Timber-encased steel composite (TESC) columns — finite-element study of axial load distribution and buckling behaviour of columns with embedded H-section steel (ResearchGate state-of-art on steel-timber-(concrete) structures).
Steel-timber composite (STC) column consisting of H-shaped steel and glulam — axial compression of 22 large-scale 2 m columns. Engineering Structures (ScienceDirect S0141029619345158). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019
Numerical analysis on seismic behavior of a novel steel-timber composite frame column (2024). Engineering Research Express, 6, IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ad476c
Finite Element Modeling of Beam-to-Column Steel-Timber Composite Joints with Different Parameters (2024). Buildings, 14(9), 2858, MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092858
Experimental investigation of timber samples under triaxial compression conditions / timber-infilled steel tube (TIST) columns (2022). Journal of Building Engineering (ScienceDirect S2352710222009044). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022
Chun, Q., et al. (2021). Experimental Study on Axial Compression Behavior of Circular Timber Columns Strengthened with CFRP Strips and Near-Surface Mounted Steel Bars. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE), 147(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002931
Axial compressive behavior of FRP-confined laminated timber columns (2023). Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 24, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-023-00827-z
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of reinforced concrete columns with FRP and/or steel confinement (2015). Engineering Structures (ScienceDirect S014102961500173X). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015
Experimental research and finite element analysis on seismic behavior of square reinforced concrete columns with four interlocking spirals (2022). Structures (ScienceDirect S2352012422001916). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022
Finite element study on seismic performance of reinforced concrete bridge pier with kinked rebars (2024). Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2024-0090
Non-linear finite element analysis of SFRC beam-column joints under cyclic loading: enhancing ductility and structural integrity (2024). Scientific Reports, 14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69270-1
Numerical simulation of reverse cyclic loading in precast column and pocket foundation connection (2026). Scientific Reports, 16 (modelled per IS 456 and IS 13920). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36686-w
Influence of slab composite effect on the seismic performance of a six-story timber-concrete composite moment-resisting frame (2025). Journal of Building Engineering (ScienceDirect S2352710225000518). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025
Hybrid timber-based structures: A state of the art review (2022). Construction and Building Materials (ScienceDirect S0950061822031610). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022
Study on Seismic Performance of Composite Structures with Reinforced Concrete Columns and Masonry Walls (2025). Buildings, 15(24), 4481, MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15244481
Seismic behavior of an innovative prefabricated steel-concrete composite beam-column joint (2023). Journal of Building Engineering (ScienceDirect S2352710223013918). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023
IS 456:2000 — Plain and Reinforced Concrete — Code of Practice. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
IS 13920:2016 — Ductile Design and Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to Seismic Forces — Code of Practice. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
IS 1893 (Part 1):2016 — Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Part 1: General Provisions and Buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
Nilesh B. Gawali, Sunil B. Thakare, & Dattatray P. Kambale. (2025). "Optimizing Structural Performance: A Review of RCC, Steel, And Timber Combinations In Civil Engineering". https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14854924

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in our journal are licensed under CC-BY 4.0, which permits authors to retain copyright of their work. This license allows for unrestricted use, sharing, and reproduction of the articles, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors and the source.